6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Computer-assisted lung nodule volumetry from multi-detector row CT: influence of image reconstruction parameters.

      European Journal of Radiology
      Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Algorithms, Female, Humans, Lung Neoplasms, pathology, radiography, Male, Middle Aged, Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted, Solitary Pulmonary Nodule, Statistics, Nonparametric, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, methods

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          To investigate differences in volumetric measurement of pulmonary nodules caused by changing the reconstruction parameters for multi-detector row CT. Thirty-nine pulmonary nodules less than 2 cm in diameter were examined by multi-slice CT. All nodules were solid, and located in the peripheral part of the lungs. The resultant 48 parameters images were reconstructed by changing slice thickness (1.25, 2.5, 3.75, or 5 mm), field of view (FOV: 10, 20, or 30 cm), algorithm (high-spatial frequency algorithm or low-spatial frequency algorithm) and reconstruction interval (reconstruction with 50% overlapping of the reconstructed slices or non-overlapping reconstruction). Volumetric measurements were calculated using commercially available software. The differences between nodule volumes were analyzed by the Kruskal-Wallis test and the Wilcoxon Signed-Ranks test. The diameter of the nodules was 8.7+/-2.7 mm on average, ranging from 4.3 to 16.4mm. Pulmonary nodule volume did not change significantly with changes in slice thickness or FOV (p>0.05), but was significantly larger with the high-spatial frequency algorithm than the low-spatial frequency algorithm (p<0.05), except for one reconstruction parameter. The volumes determined by non-overlapping reconstruction were significantly larger than those of overlapping reconstruction (p<0.05), except for a 1.25 mm thickness with 10 cm FOV with the high-spatial frequency algorithm, and 5mm thickness. The maximum difference in measured volume was 16% on average between the 1.25 mm slice thickness/10 cm FOV/high-spatial frequency algorithm parameters and overlapping reconstruction. Volumetric measurements of pulmonary nodules differ with changes in the reconstruction parameters, with a tendency toward larger volumes in high-spatial frequency algorithm and non-overlapping reconstruction compared to the low-spatial frequency algorithm and overlapping reconstruction.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Comments

          Comment on this article