11
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Inclisiran for the treatment of hypercholesterolaemia: implications and unanswered questions from the ORION trials

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Recently, three back-to-back published randomized clinical trials provided convincing results for the novel lipid-lowering agent Inclisiran. Inclisiran is a small interfering RNA (siRNA) that inhibits the hepatic translation proprotein convertase subtilisin-kexin type 9 (PCSK9), thereby upregulating the number of LDL-receptors on the hepatocytes. In the ORION-9 trial, 482 heterozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH) patients were randomized to either 300 mg inclisiran sodium or matching placebo administered at baseline, 3 months later and then every 6 months for a total of four doses and showed a mean placebo-adjusted LDL-C reduction of 47.9% at the primary efficacy timepoint (Day 510) and a time-averaged LDL-C reduction of 44.3% over the 18-month trial. 1 The ORION-10 and 11 had a similar design but included 1561 patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD) in the ORION-10 trial and 1617 patients with either cardiovascular disease or risk-equivalent disease in ORION-11 (type 2 diabetes, heterozygous FH, or 10-year 20% risk in the Framingham risk score) (Figure 1). 2 Both trials showed an LDL-C reduction of at least 50% at the primary efficacy timepoint of Day 510 and a mean time-averaged LDL-C reduction of about 50% for the Inclisiran groups compared to placebo. In all three trials, Inclisiran reduced plasma PCSK9-levels with approximately 80% without any indication that this reduction attenuated over the duration of the trials. Moreover, Inclisiran also significantly lowered total cholesterol, non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C), apolipoprotein B, and triglycerides and was associated with an 18.6–25.6% reduction in lipoprotein(a) [LP(a)] levels. HDL-C levels increased in the Inclisiran groups, but no differences in C-reactive protein (CRP) levels were found. Generally, Inclisiran had a favourable safety and tolerability profile—adverse events at the injection site (such as redness, bruising, or swelling) were more common in the inclisiran group than in the placebo group, but most were mild and none were severe or persistent. Figure 1 (A) Simplified overview of mechanism of action by Inclisiran. Inclisiran is delivered to the hepatocyte through the asialoglycoprotein receptor (ASGPR). Its antisense strand then binds to the RNA Induced Silencing complex (RISC). The combination of RISC and the antisense stand then binds PCSK9 messenger RNA (mRNA), leading to degradation of PCSK9 mRNA and less PCSK9 protein synthesis. PCSK9 directs LDL receptor (LDLR) for degradation by the lysosome. Due to less PCSK9 protein, more LDLR can be recycled to the hepatic membrane for LDL-C uptake. (B) Waterfall plots for the ORION-10 and ORION-11 trials (with permission). These plots show the change in LDL-C between baseline and day 510 for each patient. Patients are ordered from the patients with the highest increase in LDL-C to the patient with the highest decrease in LDL-C. These results mark an important milestone in both the development of lipid-lowering therapy as well as in the development of siRNA therapies. While siRNA therapies are currently approved for a rare disease, inclisiran is the first siRNA that has the potential to be used in the wide prevention of a common disease, atherosclerosis. In clinical practice, >70% of patients with established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease do not reach an LDL-C < 70 mg/dL. Poor adherence to currently available therapies is an important contributing factor and has been shown to be associated with an increased risk of CVD. 3 Inclisiran’s infrequent dosing regimen may contribute to higher adherence—even complete adherence if inclisiran is administered by healthcare providers. In addition to the benefit of durability which enables an infrequent dosing regimen, the LDL-C reductions produced by inclisiran are substantial and similar to those of high-intensity statins—combining these treatments should contribute to substantial increase in the percentage of patients achieving their guideline-recommended LDL-C levels. 4 Although these trials support the clinical application of inclisiran in hypercholesterolaemic patients, there are still open ends in research on PCSK9 per se and also on intra- or extracellular PCSK9 inhibition. First, inclisiran inhibits the synthesis of PCSK9 within hepatocytes, as opposed to the extracellular inhibition by the currently approved PCSK9 monoclonal antibodies. Although the ORION trials show an effect on LDL-C and other lipids and lipoproteins that is similar to those seen with monoclonal antibodies, there is some evidence that PCSK9 also impacts lipid and lipoprotein metabolism through an intracellular mechanism. 5 It is to be determined whether inclisiran exerts some of its lipid-lowering effects by modulating these intracellular pathways. Moreover, even with the use of lipid-lowering therapy, a substantial residual risk on cardiovascular disease remains. This residual risk is thought to be caused by a combination of dyslipidaemia, dysglycaemia, hypertension, procoagulant status, and inflammation. Statins are shown to be effective in patients with a heightened inflammatory state as measured by increased hsCRP levels, 6 and lower these levels by 37%—although it has not been confirmed that statin-induced CRP reductions contribute to their clinical effects beyond LDL-C reduction. Although PCSK9 inhibition does not lower CRP levels in clinical trials, including in the ORION trials, 1 , 2 , 7 pre-clinical studies provided substantial evidence for a connection between PCSK9 and inflammation. This has already been the subject of many reviews. 7 , 8 Among others, pro-inflammatory molecules such as hepatocyte nuclear factor-1a, lipopolysaccharide, and tumour necrosis factor alpha are shown to induce PCSK9 in various cell lines. 8 In addition, PCSK9 is also expressed in atherosclerotic plaques and in vascular areas with low shear stress, mainly in vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs). PCSK9 is associated with atherosclerotic plaque size and with apoptosis of these VSMCs, as well as with neo-intima proliferation. 7 In patients with FH, PCSK9 inhibitors reduced the inflammatory phenotype of monocytes without a change in CRP. 9 Furthermore, PCSK9 is reported to regulate scavenger receptor expression and plays a role in oxidized LDL-C uptake through a feedback loop with LOX-1, thereby contributing to foam cell formation. 7 Finally, a PCSK9 loss-of-function variant was associated with beneficial clinical outcome in patients with septic shock, further providing evidence for a role of PCSK9 in inflammation. 8 In summary, future studies could characterize the specific role of PCSK9 in inflammation. Studies with other therapies that lower LDL-C by upregulating the LDL receptor have shown discrepant effects on the incidence of type 2 diabetes (T2D). Although statins are shown to increase the risk of T2D, 10 a meta-analysis of 39 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with either the PCSK9 inhibitor evolocumab or alirocumab did not show an increase in the risk of T2D. 11 However, Mendelian Randomization demonstrated earlier that LDL-C reduction due to genetic variants in the PCSK9 locus did increase the risk of T2D. 12 The exact mechanism through which statins and PCSK9 inhibitors could increase the risk for T2D is not clear, but it is tempting to speculate that upregulation of the LDL receptor on beta-cells in the pancreas might lead to lipotoxicity and premature cell death. Finally, Inclisiran is an agent that makes use of a GalNAc-tail to ensure its hepatic delivery through the asialoglycoprotein receptor (ASGPR). 5 ASGPR is a transmembrane protein that consists of two subunits, ASGR1 and ASGR2, and is mainly expressed by hepatocytes. ASGR1 expression was shown to be directly correlated with protein levels, which could impact drug-delivery through ASGPR. 13 However, pre-clinical models with up to 50% reduced ASGPR receptor expression showed no impairment in the uptake of GalNAc-siRNA conjugates, which may explain the homogeneous response to inclisiran in the ORION trials. 14 The subunit ASGR1 was shown to be the most critically involved subunit. Human models using variations in ASGR1 could be used to assess the drug-delivery capacity of ASGPR. In summary, the recent publications of three RCTs investigating inclisiran reaffirm the efficacy of this compound in reducing LDL-C and show that its long therapeutic half-life comes with a favourable side-effect profile. Here, we highlighted some of the questions and opportunities for further research, including the effects of intracellular inhibition of PCSK9; the impact of inflammation on CVD and the role of PCSK9 specifically; the uncertain connection between PCSK9 inhibition and type 2 diabetes; and the association between ASGPR protein function and drug-delivery efficacy for Inclisiran and other GalNAc-linked compounds. Conflict of interest: A.J.C. has nothing to disclose. J.J.P.K., has received consulting fees from Akcea Therapeutics, AstraZeneca, CiVi Biopharma, Corvidia Therapeutics, CSL Behring, Daiichi Sankyo, Draupnir Bio, Esperion, Gemphire Therapeutics, Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, Matinas BioPharma, NorthSea Therapeutics, Novo Nordisk, Novartis, Regeneron Pharamaceuticals, REGENXBIO, Staten Biotechnology, and 89bio.

          Related collections

          Most cited references9

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Two Phase 3 Trials of Inclisiran in Patients with Elevated LDL Cholesterol

          Inclisiran inhibits hepatic synthesis of proprotein convertase subtilisin-kexin type 9. Previous studies suggest that inclisiran might provide sustained reductions in low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels with infrequent dosing.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            PCSK9 and inflammation: role of shear stress, pro-inflammatory cytokines, and LOX-1.

            PCSK9 degrades low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL) receptors and subsequently increases serum LDL cholesterol. Clinical trials show that inhibition of PCSK9 efficiently lowers LDL cholesterol levels and reduces cardiovascular events. PCSK9 inhibitors also reduce the extent of atherosclerosis. Recent studies show that PCSK9 is secreted by vascular endothelial cells, smooth muscle cells, and macrophages. PCSK9 induces secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines in macrophages, liver cells, and in a variety of tissues. PCSK9 regulates toll-like receptor 4 expression and NF-κB activation as well as development of apoptosis and autophagy. PCSK9 also interacts with oxidized-LDL receptor-1 (LOX-1) in a mutually facilitative fashion. These observations suggest that PCSK9 is inter-twined with inflammation with implications in atherosclerosis and its major consequence-myocardial ischaemia. This relationship provides a basis for the use of PCSK9 inhibitors in prevention of atherosclerosis and related clinical events.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Efficacy and safety of alirocumab and evolocumab: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

              The effect of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol-lowering therapy with alirocumab or evolocumab on individual clinical efficacy and safety endpoints remains unclear. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of alirocumab and evolocumab in patients with dyslipidaemia or atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. We performed a review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing treatment with alirocumab or evolocumab vs. placebo or other lipid-lowering therapies up to March 2018. Primary efficacy endpoints were all-cause death, cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction (MI), and stroke. We estimated risk ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) using random effect models. We included 39 RCTs comprising 66 478 patients of whom 35 896 were treated with proprotein convertase subtilisin–kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors (14 639 with alirocumab and 21 257 with evolocumab) and 30 582 with controls. Mean weighted follow-up time across trials was 2.3 years with an exposure time of 150 617 patient-years. Overall, the effects of PCSK9 inhibition on all-cause death and cardiovascular death were not statistically significant (P = 0.15 and P = 0.34, respectively). Proprotein convertase subtilisin–kexin type 9 inhibitors were associated with lower risk of MI (1.49 vs. 1.93 per 100 patient-year; RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.74–0.86; I2 = 0%; P < 0.0001), ischaemic stroke (0.44 vs. 0.58 per 100 patient-year; RR 0.78, 95% CI 0.67–0.89; I2 = 0%; P = 0.0005), and coronary revascularization (2.16 vs. 2.64 per 100 patient-year; RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.78–0.89; I2 = 0%; P < 0.0001), compared with the control group. Use of these PCSK9 inhibitors was not associated with increased risk of neurocognitive adverse events (P = 0.91), liver enzymes elevations (P = 0.34), rhabdomyolysis (P = 0.58), or new-onset diabetes mellitus (P = 0.97). Proprotein convertase subtilisin–kexin type 9 inhibition with alirocumab or evolocumab was associated with lower risk of MI, stroke, and coronary revascularization, with favourable safety profile.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Cardiovasc Res
                Cardiovasc. Res
                cardiovascres
                Cardiovascular Research
                Oxford University Press
                0008-6363
                1755-3245
                01 September 2020
                07 August 2020
                07 August 2020
                : 116
                : 11
                : e136-e139
                Affiliations
                Department of Vascular Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centres – location AMC, University of Amsterdam , Amsterdam, The Netherlands
                Author notes
                Corresponding author. Email: j.j.kastelein@ 123456amsterdamumc.nl
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3300-8124
                Article
                cvaa212
                10.1093/cvr/cvaa212
                7449556
                32766688
                6ddc8f5e-18f3-4c97-99b5-160719e37598
                © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com

                History
                Page count
                Pages: 4
                Categories
                Cardiovascular Research Onlife
                Clinical Commentaries
                AcademicSubjects/MED00200

                Cardiovascular Medicine
                inclisiran,hypercholesterolaemia,inflammation,diabetes,sirna,drug-delivery, asgpr,galnac

                Comments

                Comment on this article