117
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    2
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found

      Genotoxicity and mutagenicity of nickel(II) and iron(III) and interactions between these microelements

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Abstract. Background: Nickel and iron are essential and necessary elements required for correct functioning of the human body when found in trace amounts, but their excess can be toxic for cells. They are widely used in numerous industrial applications as components in orthopedic implants and in dietary supplementation. The aim of this study was to examine the effect of nickel(II) and iron(III) and their combinations on genotoxicity and mutagenicity in BALB/3T3 and HepG2 cells. Materials and methods: Genotoxicity of nickel and iron and their mixture was assessed by analyzing induction of ­micronucleus formation and DNA damage by comet assay in BALB/3T3 and HepG2 cells. Mutagenicity of iron(III) and nickel(II) and their mixtures was assessed by Ames assay. Results: A statistically significant increase of DNA damage through use of both microelements in both cell lines was observed. The micronucleus assay performed with the use of all concentrations showed a statistically significant induction of chromosomal aberrations in both tested microelements in both cell lines. The results obtained from both cell lines in both tests show that BALB/3T3 cells are more sensitive when compared to the HepG2 cells after incubation with both microelements. Additions of iron(III) at 200 µM plus nickel(II) at 1,000 µM showed antagonistic effects in a decrease of genotoxicity as assessed by comet and micronuclei assays in both cell lines. In the case of nickel(II) at 200 µM plus iron(III) at 1,000 µM, a synergistic effect was observed. The results of Ames assay show that both tested microelements caused an increased number of reverse mutations. Conclusion: Nickel(II) and iron(III) are genotoxic. Nickel chloride evokes frameshift mutation more often than base-pair substitution mutation. However, in the case of iron chloride, the frequency in frameshift and base-pair substitution mutation was similar. Iron(III) at concentrations of 200 µM plays a protective role against nickel(II) genotoxicity and mutagenicity.


          Related collections

          Most cited references31

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Nickel essentiality, toxicity, and carcinogenicity

          The increasing utilization of heavy metals in modern industries leads to an increase in the environmental burden. Nickel represents a good example of a metal whose use is widening in modern technologies. As the result of accelerated consumption of nickel-containing products nickel compounds are released to the environment at all stages of production and utilization. Their accumulation in the environment may represent a serious hazard to human health. Among the known health related effects of nickel are skin allergies, lung fibrosis, variable degrees of kidney and cardiovascular system poisoning and stimulation of neoplastic transformation. The mechanism of the latter effect is not known and is the subject of detailed investigation. This review provides an analysis of the current state in the field.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Nickel carcinogenesis.

            Human exposure to highly nickel-polluted environments, such as those associated with nickel refining, electroplating, and welding, has the potential to produce a variety of pathologic effects. Among them are skin allergies, lung fibrosis, and cancer of the respiratory tract. The exact mechanisms of nickel-induced carcinogenesis are not known and have been the subject of numerous epidemiologic and experimental investigations. These mechanisms are likely to involve genetic and epigenetic routes. The present review provides evidence for the genotoxic and mutagenic activity of Ni(II) particularly at high doses. Such doses are best delivered into the cells by phagocytosis of sparingly soluble nickel-containing dust particles. Ni(II) genotoxicity may be aggravated through the generation of DNA-damaging reactive oxygen species (ROS) and the inhibition of DNA repair by this metal. Broad spectrum of epigenetic effects of nickel includes alteration in gene expression resulting from DNA hypermethylation and histone hypoacetylation, as well as activation or silencing of certain genes and transcription factors, especially those involved in cellular response to hypoxia. The investigations of the pathogenic effects of nickel greatly benefit from the understanding of the chemical basis of Ni(II) interactions with intracellular targets/ligands and oxidants. Many pathogenic effects of nickel are due to the interference with the metabolism of essential metals such as Fe(II), Mn(II), Ca(II), Zn(II), or Mg(II). Research in this field allows for identification of putative Ni(II) targets relevant to carcinogenesis and prediction of pathogenic effects caused by exposure to nickel. Ultimately, the investigations of nickel carcinogenesis should be aimed at the development of treatments that would inhibit or prevent Ni(II) interactions with critical target molecules and ions, Fe(II) in particular, and thus avert the respiratory tract cancer and other adverse health effects in nickel workers.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The control of histone methylation and gene expression by oxidative stress, hypoxia, and metals.

              The harmful consequences of carcinogenic metals, such as nickel, arsenic, and chromium, are thought to be in part due to their ability to induce oxidative stress. The ubiquity of oxidative stress in biological systems has made it a fairly obvious culprit in causing cellular damage and/or development of disease. However, the full extent of oxidative stress-induced damage is not limited to its direct effects on cellular components, such as lipids, proteins, and DNA, but may extend to its ability to alter gene expression. Gene expression regulation is an important component of cellular and/or tissue homeostasis, and its alteration can have detrimental consequences. Therefore, a growing amount of interest is being paid to understanding how oxidative stress can influence gene expression. Oxidative stress-induced epigenetic dysregulation in the form of posttranslational histone modifications, in particular, is a popular topic of research. This review will therefore primarily focus on discussing the role of oxidative stress and hypoxia on histone methylation and/or gene expression alterations. The sources of oxidative stress discussed here are carcinogenic metals, such as, nickel, arsenic, and chromium. Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Trace Elements and Electrolytes
                TE
                Dustri-Verlag Dr. Karl Feistle
                0946-2104
                August 27 2018
                Article
                10.5414/TEX01545
                6dec395f-d081-4a4e-b6c4-548b7d50d83b
                © 2018
                History

                Endocrinology & Diabetes,General medicine,Medicine,Gastroenterology & Hepatology,Nutrition & Dietetics
                nickel(II),iron(III),genotoxicity,mutagenicity

                Comments

                Comment on this article