5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Characterization of Patients With Obstructed Defecation and Slow Transit Constipation With a Simulated Stool

      research-article
      , MD, PhD, AGAF 1 , , , MD 1 , , PhD 1 , , MSc 1 , , MD 1 , , MD, PhD 1 , , PhD 2 , , MD, PhD 1
      Clinical and Translational Gastroenterology
      Wolters Kluwer

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          INTRODUCTION:

          Defecatory disorders including obstructed defecation (OD) are currently diagnosed using specialized investigations including anorectal manometry and the balloon expulsion test. Recently, we developed a simulated stool named Fecobionics that provides a novel type of pressure measurements and analysis. The aim was to study OD phenotypes compared with slow transit constipation (STC) patients and normal subjects (NS).

          METHODS:

          Fecobionics expulsion parameters were assessed in an interventional study design. The Fecobionics device contained pressure sensors at the front, rear, and inside a bag. All constipation patients had colon transit study, defecography, anorectal manometry, and balloon expulsion test performed. The Fecobionics bag was distended in the rectum until desire-to-defecate in 26 OD compared with 8 STC patients and 10 NS. Rear-front pressures (preload-afterload parameters) and defecation indices (DIs) were compared between groups.

          RESULTS:

          The Wexner constipation scoring system score was 13.8 ± 0.9 and 14.6 ± 1.5 in the OD and STC patients ( P > 0.5). The median desire-to-defecate volume was 80 (quartiles 56–80), 60 (54–80), and 45 (23–60) mL in OD, STC, and NS, respectively ( P < 0.01). The median expulsion duration was 37 (quartiles 15–120), 6 (3–11), and 11 (8–11) seconds for the 3 groups ( P < 0.03). Fecobionics rear-front pressure diagrams demonstrated clockwise loops with distinct phenotype differences between OD and the other groups. Most DIs differed between OD and the other groups, especially those based on the anal afterload reflecting the nature of OD constipation. Several OD subtypes were identified.

          DISCUSSION:

          Fecobionics obtained novel pressure phenotypes in OD patients. DIs showed pronounced differences between groups. Larger studies are needed on OD subtyping.

          Related collections

          Most cited references41

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            The functional gastrointestinal disorders and the Rome III process.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              A constipation scoring system to simplify evaluation and management of constipated patients.

              Constipation is a common complaint; however, clinical presentation varies with each individual. The aim of this study was to assess a standard scoring system for evaluation of constipated patients. All consecutive patients with idiopathic constipation who were referred for anorectal physiologic testing were assessed. A subjective constipation score was calculated based on a detailed questionnaire that included over 100 constipation-related symptoms. Based on the questionnaire, scores ranged from 0 to 30, with 0 indicating normal and 30 indicating severe constipation. The constipation score was then compared with the objective findings of the physiology tests, which include colonic transit time (CTT), anal manometry (AM), cinedefecography (CD), and electromyography (EMG). Colonic inertia was defined as diffuse marker delay on CTT without evidence of paradoxical contraction on AM, CD, or EMG. Pelvic outlet obstruction was defined as paradoxical puborectalis contraction, rectal prolapse or rectoanal intussusception, rectocele, or sigmoidocele. A total of 232 patients (185 females and 47 males) of a mean age of 64.9 (range, 14-92) years were evaluated. All patients had a score of more than 15; on evaluation of the significance of different symptoms in the constipation score with the Pearson's linear correlation test, 8 of 18 factors were identified as significant (P < 0.05). These factors included frequency of bowel movements, painful evacuation, incomplete evacuation, abdominal pain, length of time per attempt, assistance for evacuation, unsuccessful attempts for evacuation per 24 hours, and duration of constipation. All 232 patients had objective obstruction attributable to one or more of the following causes: paradoxical puborectalis contraction (81), significant rectocele or sigmoidocele (48), rectoanal intussusception (64), and rectal prolapse (9). The proposed constipation scoring system correlated well with objective physiologic findings in constipated patients to allow uniformity in assessment of the severity of constipation.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Clin Transl Gastroenterol
                Clin Transl Gastroenterol
                CLTG
                CT9
                CT9
                Clinical and Translational Gastroenterology
                Wolters Kluwer (Philadelphia, PA )
                2155-384X
                May 2021
                05 May 2021
                : 12
                : 5
                : e00354
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Surgery, the Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong;
                [2 ]School of Microelectronics and Communication Engineering, Chongqing University, Shapingba, China.
                Author notes
                Correspondence: Hans Gregersen, MD, PhD, AGAF. E-mail: hag@ 123456giome.org .
                Article
                CTG-20-0418 00007
                10.14309/ctg.0000000000000354
                8099406
                33949343
                6df958c0-c586-4e95-aaf4-99bdfba85974
                © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American College of Gastroenterology

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.

                History
                : 05 August 2020
                : 29 March 2021
                Categories
                Article
                Functional GI Disorders
                Custom metadata
                TRUE

                Gastroenterology & Hepatology
                Gastroenterology & Hepatology

                Comments

                Comment on this article