147
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    11
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The bridge of iconicity: from a world of experience to the experience of language

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Iconicity, a resemblance between properties of linguistic form (both in spoken and signed languages) and meaning, has traditionally been considered to be a marginal, irrelevant phenomenon for our understanding of language processing, development and evolution. Rather, the arbitrary and symbolic nature of language has long been taken as a design feature of the human linguistic system. In this paper, we propose an alternative framework in which iconicity in face-to-face communication (spoken and signed) is a powerful vehicle for bridging between language and human sensori-motor experience, and, as such, iconicity provides a key to understanding language evolution, development and processing. In language evolution, iconicity might have played a key role in establishing displacement (the ability of language to refer beyond what is immediately present), which is core to what language does; in ontogenesis, iconicity might play a critical role in supporting referentiality (learning to map linguistic labels to objects, events, etc., in the world), which is core to vocabulary development. Finally, in language processing, iconicity could provide a mechanism to account for how language comes to be embodied (grounded in our sensory and motor systems), which is core to meaningful communication.

          Related collections

          Most cited references143

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Perceptual symbol systems.

          Prior to the twentieth century, theories of knowledge were inherently perceptual. Since then, developments in logic, statistics, and programming languages have inspired amodal theories that rest on principles fundamentally different from those underlying perception. In addition, perceptual approaches have become widely viewed as untenable because they are assumed to implement recording systems, not conceptual systems. A perceptual theory of knowledge is developed here in the context of current cognitive science and neuroscience. During perceptual experience, association areas in the brain capture bottom-up patterns of activation in sensory-motor areas. Later, in a top-down manner, association areas partially reactivate sensory-motor areas to implement perceptual symbols. The storage and reactivation of perceptual symbols operates at the level of perceptual components--not at the level of holistic perceptual experiences. Through the use of selective attention, schematic representations of perceptual components are extracted from experience and stored in memory (e.g., individual memories of green, purr, hot). As memories of the same component become organized around a common frame, they implement a simulator that produces limitless simulations of the component (e.g., simulations of purr). Not only do such simulators develop for aspects of sensory experience, they also develop for aspects of proprioception (e.g., lift, run) and introspection (e.g., compare, memory, happy, hungry). Once established, these simulators implement a basic conceptual system that represents types, supports categorization, and produces categorical inferences. These simulators further support productivity, propositions, and abstract concepts, thereby implementing a fully functional conceptual system. Productivity results from integrating simulators combinatorially and recursively to produce complex simulations. Propositions result from binding simulators to perceived individuals to represent type-token relations. Abstract concepts are grounded in complex simulations of combined physical and introspective events. Thus, a perceptual theory of knowledge can implement a fully functional conceptual system while avoiding problems associated with amodal symbol systems. Implications for cognition, neuroscience, evolution, development, and artificial intelligence are explored.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Demography and Cultural Evolution: How Adaptive Cultural Processes can Produce Maladaptive Losses: The Tasmanian Case

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Grounding language in action

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci
                Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond., B, Biol. Sci
                RSTB
                royptb
                Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
                The Royal Society
                0962-8436
                1471-2970
                19 September 2014
                19 September 2014
                : 369
                : 1651 , Theme Issue ‘Language as a multimodal phenomenon: implications for language learning, processing and evolution’ compiled and edited by Gabriella Vigliocco, Pamela Perniss, Robin L. Thompson and David Vinson
                : 20130300
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Cognitive, Perceptual & Brain Sciences Department , 26 Bedford Way, London, WC1H 0AP, UK
                [2 ]Deafness, Cognition & Language Research Centre , 49 Gordon Square, London, WC1H 0PD, UK
                Author notes
                [†]

                Present address: Cognitive, Perceptual and Brain Sciences Department, 26 Bedford Way, London, WC1H 0AP, UK.

                Article
                rstb20130300
                10.1098/rstb.2013.0300
                4123679
                25092668
                6e4a3b8b-5c0d-407b-8908-87a3eebf688d

                © 2014 The Authors. Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/, which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                Categories
                42
                Articles
                Opinion Piece
                Custom metadata
                September 19, 2014

                Philosophy of science
                language evolution,language development,language processing,iconicity,sign language,co-speech gesture

                Comments

                Comment on this article