64
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Daptomycin as a possible new treatment option for surgical management of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus sternal wound infection after cardiac surgery

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          We present a case of a 77-year old female who had undergone a coronary artery bypass grafting with an aortic valve replacement and developed three month later a Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) sternal wound infection which was successful treated with Daptomycin combined with vacuum-assisted closure (VAC).

          Related collections

          Most cited references15

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Daptomycin: a lipopeptide antibiotic for the treatment of serious Gram-positive infections.

          Infections caused by drug-resistant pathogens are on the rise. Daptomycin, a cyclic lipopeptide with activity against most Gram-positive pathogens, including vancomycin-resistant enterococci and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, is a newly US-FDA approved antimicrobial for complicated skin and skin structure infections (cSSSI). Daptomycin has a unique mechanism of action that results in destruction of the membrane potential. The rapid bactericidal activity of daptomycin makes it an attractive antibiotic for serious Gram-positive infections.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Poststernotomy mediastinitis: a review of conventional surgical treatments, vacuum-assisted closure therapy and presentation of the Lund University Hospital mediastinitis algorithm.

            Poststernotomy mediastinitis, also commonly called deep sternal wound infection, is one of the most feared complications in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. The overall incidence of poststernotomy mediastinitis is relatively low, between 1% and 3%, however, this complication is associated with a significant mortality, usually reported to vary between 10% and 25%. At the present time, there is no general consensus regarding the appropriate surgical approach to mediastinitis following open-heart surgery and a wide range of wound-healing strategies have been established for the treatment of poststernotomy mediastinitis during the era of modern cardiac surgery. Conventional forms of treatment usually involve surgical revision with open dressings or closed irrigation, or reconstruction with vascularized soft tissue flaps such as omentum or pectoral muscle. Unfortunately, procedure-related morbidity is relatively frequent when using conventional treatments and the long-term clinical outcome has been unsatisfying. Vacuum-assisted closure is a novel treatment with an ingenious mechanism. This wound-healing technique is based on the application of local negative pressure to a wound. During the application of negative pressure to a sternal wound several advantageous features from conventional surgical treatment are combined. Recent publications have demonstrated encouraging clinical results, however, observations are still rather limited and the underlying mechanisms are largely unknown. This review provides an overview of the etiology and common risk factors for deep sternal wound infections and presents the historical development of conventional therapies. We also discuss the current experiences with VAC therapy in poststernotomy mediastinitis and summarize the current knowledge on the mechanisms by which VAC therapy promotes wound healing. Finally, we suggest a structured algorithm for using VAC therapy for treatment of poststernotomy mediastinitis in clinical practice.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Postoperative mediastinitis in cardiac surgery - microbiology and pathogenesis.

              During 1992-2000, postoperative mediastinitis developed after 126 (1.32%) of 9557 consecutive cardiac surgery procedures. The study was done to describe the variation in clinical characteristics and microbiological etiology in mediastinitis. The records of 126 cases of postoperative mediastinitis were reviewed. The median time from operation to the development of mediastinitis was 7 days. Sternal dehiscence was seen in 86 patients (68%). Coagulase negative staphylococci (CNS) were isolated in 46% of the cases with a verified microbiological etiology, Staphylococcus aureus in 26% and gram-negative bacteria in 18%. CNS were more frequently isolated in patients with sternal dehiscence (44/80, 55%) than in patients with stable sternum (10/38, 26%) (P=0.003). However, S. aureus was more frequent in patients with stable sternum (18/38, 47%) than in patients with sternal dehiscence (13/80, 16%) (P<0.001). High body mass index was associated with coagulase negative staphylococci (P<0.001) and with sternal dehiscence (P=0.008). Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease was also associated with sternal dehiscence (P<0.001) and with coagulase negative staphylococci (P=0.04). Patients who had been reoperated before onset of mediastinitis tended to have an increased risk for a gram-negative etiology (32 vs. 15% in patients not reoperated, P=0.06). The overall 90-day all cause mortality in patients with mediastinitis was 19%. High age, need for reoperation before mediastinitis, and a long primary operation time was associated with increased mortality (P=0.02, P=0.007 and P=0.001, respectively). No specific bacterial etiology was associated with increased mortality nor was the presence of bacteriemia. Three different types of postoperative mediastinitis can be distinguished: (1) mediastinitis associated with obesity, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and sternal dehiscence, typically caused by coagulase negative staphylococci; (2) mediastinitis following peroperative contamination of the mediastinal space, often caused by S. aureus, and (3) mediastinitis mainly caused by spread from concomitant infections in other sites during the postoperative period, often caused by gram negative rods. The proposed classification of mediastinitis into three groups with different pathogenic mechanisms may be useful in understanding which prophylactic counter measures have the potentials to be effective in a given situation.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                J Cardiothorac Surg
                Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery
                BioMed Central
                1749-8090
                2010
                6 August 2010
                : 5
                : 57
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, University of Göttingen, Germany
                [2 ]Division of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
                [3 ]Department of Anaesthesiology, Emergency and Intensive Care Medicine, University of Göttingen, Germany
                Article
                1749-8090-5-57
                10.1186/1749-8090-5-57
                2922106
                20691034
                6e52c2e6-d9d6-4fb9-9922-91cb198d5dc3
                Copyright ©2010 Popov et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 10 May 2010
                : 6 August 2010
                Categories
                Case Report

                Surgery
                Surgery

                Comments

                Comment on this article