11
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Experiences of aging in place in the United States: protocol for a systematic review and meta-ethnography of qualitative studies

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          By 2035, older adults will outnumber children for the first time in the United States (US). In light of its aging population, the US has supported services focused on enabling older adults to continue living in their current homes, a model commonly described as “aging in place.” The lived experience of aging in place is not well documented in existing systematic reviews. The aims of this systematic review are to synthesize and evaluate the existing qualitative evidence on experiences of aging in place in the US and identify knowledge gaps and directions for future studies.

          Methods

          Six electronic bibliographic databases (PubMed, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Web of Science, EMBASE, and Sociological Abstracts) will be searched. Studies presenting qualitative data on the experiences of older adults currently aging in place in the US will be included. Covidence software will be used to screen studies and extract data. The Joanna Briggs Institute checklist for qualitative research will be used to assess quality and risk of bias of included studies. We will use meta-ethnography, following the method described by Noblit and Hare, to synthesize and evaluate the results of the included studies.

          Discussion

          To the best of our knowledge, this is the first systematic review to integrate and synthesize the findings of qualitative studies of aging in place focusing on older adults in the US. The findings of this review will provide in-depth knowledge on lived experiences of aging in place and address important gaps in existing work.

          Systematic review registration

          International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO): CRD42018102847

          Electronic supplementary material

          The online version of this article (10.1186/s13643-018-0820-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

          Related collections

          Most cited references9

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Factors influencing acceptance of technology for aging in place: a systematic review.

          To provide an overview of factors influencing the acceptance of electronic technologies that support aging in place by community-dwelling older adults. Since technology acceptance factors fluctuate over time, a distinction was made between factors in the pre-implementation stage and factors in the post-implementation stage.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            "Medication career" or "moral career"? The two sides of managing antidepressants: a meta-ethnography of patients' experience of antidepressants.

            The UK National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE) Clinical Guidelines recommend routine prescription of antidepressants for moderate to severe depression. While many patients accept a prescription, one in three do not complete treatment. We carried out a meta-ethnography of published qualitative papers since 1990 whose focus is patients' experience of antidepressant use for depression, in order to understand barriers and facilitators to concordance and inform a larger qualitative study investigating antidepressant use over time. A systematic search of five databases was carried out, supported by hand searches of key journals, writing to first authors and examining reference lists. After piloting three critical appraisal tools, a modified version of the CASP (Critical Appraisal Skills Programme) checklist was used to appraise potentially relevant and qualitative papers. We carried out a synthesis using techniques of meta-ethnography involving translation and re-interpretation. Sixteen papers were included in the meta-ethnography. The papers fall into two related groups: (1) Papers whose focus is the decision-making relationship and the ways patients manage their use of antidepressants, and (2) Papers whose focus is antidepressants' effect on self-concept, ideas of stigma and its management. We found that patients' experience of antidepressants is characterised by the decision-making process and the meaning-making process, conceptualised here as the 'medication career' and 'moral career'. Our synthesis indicates ways in which general practitioners (GPs) can facilitate concordant relationships with patients regarding antidepressant use. First, GPs can enhance the potential for shared decision-making by reviewing patients' changing preferences for involvement in decision-making regularly throughout the patient's 'medication career'. Second, if GPs familiarise themselves with the competing demands that patients may experience at each decision-making juncture, they will be better placed to explore their patients' preferences and concerns--i.e. their 'moral career' of medication use. This may lead to valuable discussion of what taking antidepressants means for patients' sense of self and how their treatment decisions may be influenced by a felt sense of stigma.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              A comparative analysis of three online appraisal instruments' ability to assess validity in qualitative research.

              The concept of validity has been a central component in critical appraisal exercises evaluating the methodological quality of quantitative studies. Reactions by qualitative researchers have been mixed in relation to whether or not validity should be applied to qualitative research and if so, what criteria should be used to distinguish high-quality articles from others. We compared three online critical appraisal instruments' ability to facilitate an assessment of validity. Many reviewers have used the critical appraisal skills program (CASP) tool to complete their critical appraisal exercise; however, CASP appears to be less sensitive to aspects of validity than the evaluation tool for qualitative studies (ETQS) and the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) tool. The ETQS provides detailed instructions on how to interpret criteria; however, it is the JBI tool, with its focus on congruity, that appears to be the most coherent.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Amy.Rosenwohl-Mack@ucsf.edu
                Karen.Schumacher@ucsf.edu
                Min-Lin.Fang@ucsf.edu
                Yoshimi.Fukuoka@ucsf.edu
                Journal
                Syst Rev
                Syst Rev
                Systematic Reviews
                BioMed Central (London )
                2046-4053
                6 October 2018
                6 October 2018
                2018
                : 7
                : 155
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Social & Behavioral Sciences, School of Nursing, University of California, San Francisco (UCSF), CA USA
                [2 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2297 6811, GRID grid.266102.1, Department of Physiological Nursing, School of Nursing, , UCSF, ; CA, USA
                [3 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2297 6811, GRID grid.266102.1, Education and Research Services, UCSF Library, , UCSF, ; CA, USA
                [4 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2297 6811, GRID grid.266102.1, Institute for Health & Aging, School of Nursing, , UCSF, ; CA, USA
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1961-4622
                Article
                820
                10.1186/s13643-018-0820-8
                6173904
                30292236
                6e606e6b-b82a-4045-a80f-d8e812b9a813
                © The Author(s). 2018

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 5 July 2018
                : 17 September 2018
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000056, National Institute of Nursing Research;
                Award ID: K24NR015812
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: UCSF Graduate Dean's Health Sciences Fellowship
                Categories
                Protocol
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2018

                Public health
                aging in place,older adults,qualitative research,systematic review,meta-ethnography,living alone,staying at home,aging at home,aging in community,independent aging

                Comments

                Comment on this article