22
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
2 collections
    0
    shares

          The flagship journal of the Society for Endocrinology. Learn more

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Gastric neuroendocrine neoplasm with late liver metastasis

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Summary

          Gastric neuroendocrine neoplasms (GNENs) are classified into three types according to their aetiology. We present a clinical case of a female patient of 66 years and a well-differentiated (grade 2), type 3 GNEN with late liver metastasis (LM). The patient underwent surgical excision of a gastric lesion at 50 years of age, without any type of follow-up. Sixteen years later, she was found to have a neuroendocrine tumour (NET) metastatic to the liver. The histological review of the gastric lesion previously removed confirmed that it was a NET measuring 8 mm, pT1NxMx (Ki67 = 4%). 68Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT reported two LM and a possible pancreatic tumour/gastric adenopathy. Biopsies of the lesion were repeatedly inconclusive. She had a high chromogranin A, normal gastrin levels and negative anti-parietal cell and intrinsic factor antibodies, which is suggestive of type 3 GNEN. She underwent total gastrectomy and liver segmentectomies (segment IV and VII) with proven metastasis in two perigastric lymph nodes and both with hepatic lesions (Ki67 = 5%), yet no evidence of local recurrence. A 68Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT was performed 3 months after surgery, showing no tumour lesions and normalisation of CgA. Two years after surgery, the patient had no evidence of disease. This case illustrates a rare situation, being a type 3, well-differentiated (grade 2) GNEN, with late LM. Despite this, it was possible to perform surgery with curative intent, which is crucial in these cases, as systemic therapies have limited efficacy. We emphasise the need for extended follow-up in these patients.

          Learning points:
          • GNENs have a very heterogeneous biological behaviour.

          • Clinical distinction between the three types of GNEN is essential to plan the correct management strategy.

          • LMs are rare and more common in type 3 and grade 3 GNEN.

          • Adequate follow-up is crucial for detection of disease recurrence.

          • Curative intent surgery is the optimal therapy for patients with limited and resectable LM, especially in well-differentiated tumours (grade 1 and 2).

          Related collections

          Most cited references9

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found

          ENETS Consensus Guidelines for the Management of Patients with Liver and Other Distant Metastases from Neuroendocrine Neoplasms of Foregut, Midgut, Hindgut, and Unknown Primary

            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found

            ENETS Consensus Guidelines Update for Gastroduodenal Neuroendocrine Neoplasms

              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Therapeutic strategies for neuroendocrine liver metastases.

              Patients who have neuroendocrine tumors frequently present with liver metastases. A wide panel of treatment options exists for these patients. Liver resection with curative intent achieves the best long-term results. Highly selected patients may be considered for liver transplantation. Substantial recurrence rates reported after surgical approaches call for neoadjuvant and adjuvant concepts. Liver-directed, locally ablative procedures are recommended for patients with limited, nonresectable tumor burden. Angiographic liver-directed techniques, such as transarterial embolization, transarterial chemoembolization, and selective internal radiotherapy, offer excellent palliation for patients with liver-predominant disease. Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy is a promising palliative procedure for patients with hepatic and/or extrahepatic metastases. The efficacy of these treatment options needs to be evaluated in randomized trials. Somatostatin analogues have demonstrated effectiveness not only for symptomatic relief in patients with secreting tumors but also for the control of proliferation in small intestinal neuroendocrine tumors and most recently also in those originating from the pancreas. Chemotherapy is an option mainly for those with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors and high-grade tumors irrespective of the origin. Novel drugs targeting specific pathways within the tumor cell have produced improved progression-free survival compared with placebo in patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Despite such a diverse armamentarium, there is uncertainty with regard to the optimal treatment regimens. Newly introduced molecular-based markers, along with the conduction of clinical trials comparing the efficacy of treatment modalities, offer a chance to move the treatment of neuroendocrine tumor disease toward personalized patient care. In this report, the authors review the approaches for treatment of neuroendocrine liver metastases, identify shortcomings, and anticipate future perspectives. Furthermore, clinical practice recommendations are provided for currently available treatment options. Although multiple modalities are available for the treatment of neuroendocrine liver metastases, optimal management is unclear. The current knowledge pertaining to these treatment options is analyzed.

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Endocrinol Diabetes Metab Case Rep
                Endocrinol Diabetes Metab Case Rep
                EDM
                Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism Case Reports
                Bioscientifica Ltd (Bristol )
                2052-0573
                03 August 2018
                2018
                : 2018
                : 18-0048
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Endocrinology Department , Instituto Português de Oncologia de Coimbra Franscisco Gentil, EPE, Coimbra, Portugal
                [2 ]Surgery Department , Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra, EPE, Coimbra, Portugal
                [3 ]Gastroenterology Department , Instituto Português de Oncologia de Coimbra Franscisco Gentil, EPE, Coimbra, Portugal
                [4 ]Surgery Department , Instituto Português de Oncologia de Coimbra Franscisco Gentil, EPE, Coimbra, Portugal
                [5 ]Oncology Department , Instituto Português de Oncologia de Coimbra Franscisco Gentil, EPE, Coimbra, Portugal
                Author notes
                Correspondence should be addressed to B Marques Email ber.marques89@ 123456gmail.com
                Article
                EDM180048
                10.1530/EDM-18-0048
                6075368
                6e899190-5d01-4e8f-83c9-cc0592952c6b
                © 2018 The authors

                This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License.

                History
                : 16 June 2018
                : 16 July 2018
                Categories
                Unique/Unexpected Symptoms or Presentations of a Disease

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                Related Documents Log