53
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      A herbivore that manipulates plant defence

      letter

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Phytopathogens and herbivores induce plant defences. Whereas there is evidence that some pathogens suppress these defences by interfering with signalling pathways involved in the defence, such evidence is scarce for herbivores. We found that the invasive spider mite Tetranychus evansi suppresses the induction of the salicylic acid and jasmonic acid signalling routes involved in induced plant defences in tomato. This was reflected in the levels of inducible defence compounds, such as proteinase inhibitors, which in mite-infested plants were reduced to even lower levels than the constitutive levels in herbivore-free plants. Additionally, the spider mite suppressed the release of inducible volatiles, which are implicated in plant defence. Consequently, the mites performed much better on previously attacked plants than on non-attacked plants. These findings provide a new perspective on plant–herbivore interactions, plant protection and plant resistance to invasive species.

          Related collections

          Most cited references54

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Book: not found

          R: A language and environment for statistical computing

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Plant pathogens and integrated defence responses to infection.

            Plants cannot move to escape environmental challenges. Biotic stresses result from a battery of potential pathogens: fungi, bacteria, nematodes and insects intercept the photosynthate produced by plants, and viruses use replication machinery at the host's expense. Plants, in turn, have evolved sophisticated mechanisms to perceive such attacks, and to translate that perception into an adaptive response. Here, we review the current knowledge of recognition-dependent disease resistance in plants. We include a few crucial concepts to compare and contrast plant innate immunity with that more commonly associated with animals. There are appreciable differences, but also surprising parallels.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Defensive function of herbivore-induced plant volatile emissions in nature.

              Herbivore attack is known to increase the emission of volatiles, which attract predators to herbivore-damaged plants in the laboratory and agricultural systems. We quantified volatile emissions from Nicotiana attenuata plants growing in natural populations during attack by three species of leaf-feeding herbivores and mimicked the release of five commonly emitted volatiles individually. Three compounds (cis-3-hexen-1-ol, linalool, and cis-alpha-bergamotene) increased egg predation rates by a generalist predator; linalool and the complete blend decreased lepidopteran oviposition rates. As a consequence, a plant could reduce the number of herbivores by more than 90% by releasing volatiles. These results confirm that indirect defenses can operate in nature.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Ecol Lett
                ele
                Ecology Letters
                Blackwell Publishing Ltd
                1461-023X
                1461-0248
                March 2011
                : 14
                : 3
                : 229-236
                Affiliations
                [1 ]simpleIBED, Section Population Biology, University of Amsterdam Amsterdam, The Netherlands
                [2 ]simpleDepartment of Animal Biology, Section Entomology, Federal University of Viçosa Viçosa, Brazil
                [3 ]simpleGraduate Programme in Plant Science, Federal University of Tocantins PO BOX 66, Gurupi, TO, Brazil
                [4 ]simpleSILS, Department of Plant Physiology, University of Amsterdam Amsterdam, The Netherlands
                [5 ]simpleDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Federal University of Viçosa Viçosa, Brazil
                Author notes
                *Correspondence: E-mail: arne.janssen@ 123456uva.nl

                Re-use of this article is permitted in accordance with the Terms and Conditions set out at http://wileyonlinelibrary.com/onlineopen#OnlineOpen_Terms

                Article
                10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01575.x
                3084520
                21299823
                6e9b2d3a-0271-47f3-b1aa-572cdb886f56
                Copyright © 2011 Blackwell Publishing Ltd/CNRS

                Re-use of this article is permitted in accordance with the Creative Commons Deed, Attribution 2.5, which does not permit commercial exploitation.

                History
                : 16 November 2010
                : 22 November 2010
                : 02 December 2010
                Categories
                Letters

                Ecology
                defence suppression,induced plant defence,jasmonic acid,plant volatiles,plant–herbivore interaction,predatory mites,proteinase inhibitors,salicylic acid,spider mites,tetranychus evansi

                Comments

                Comment on this article