18
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Communication methods and production techniques in fixed prosthesis fabrication: a UK based survey. Part 1: Communication methods

      other
      1 , 2 , 2 , a , 3
      British Dental Journal
      British Dental Journal

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          • Highlights the importance of dentist-technician communication.

          • Concludes that dentists must ensure that written prescriptions contain all the necessary information so that the dental technician can fabricate fixed prostheses correctly and without delay.

          • Recommendations for improved communication are made with the ultimate goal of better patient service.

          Abstract

          Statement of the problem The General Dental Council (GDC) states that members of the dental team have to 'communicate clearly and effectively with other team members and colleagues in the interest of patients'. A number of studies from different parts of the world have highlighted problems and confirmed the need for improved communication methods and production techniques between dentists and dental technicians.

          Aim The aim of this study was to identify the communication methods and production techniques used by dentists and dental technicians for the fabrication of fixed prostheses within the UK from the dental technicians' perspective. The current publication reports on the communication methods.

          Materials and methods Seven hundred and eighty-two online questionnaires were distributed to the Dental Laboratories Association membership and included a broad range of topics. Statistical analysis was undertaken to test the influence of various demographic variables.

          Results The number of completed responses totalled 248 (32% response rate). The laboratory prescription and the telephone were the main communication tools used. Statistical analysis of the results showed that a greater number of communication methods were used by large laboratories. Frequently missing items from the laboratory prescription were the shade and the date required. The majority of respondents (73%) stated that a single shade was selected in over half of cases. Sixty-eight percent replied that the dentist allowed sufficient laboratory time. Twenty-six percent of laboratories felt either rarely involved or not involved at all as part of the dental team.

          Conclusion This study suggests that there are continuing communication and teamwork issues between dentists and dental laboratories.

          Related collections

          Most cited references13

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Communication between the dental laboratory technician and dentist: work authorization for fixed partial dentures.

          A questionnaire was sent to laboratory technicians to determine the level of communication between dentists and dental laboratories in specific areas of the work authorization forms for the fabrication of fixed partial dentures.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Considerations for services from dental technicians in fabrication of fixed prostheses: A survey of commercial dental laboratories in Thessaloniki, Greece.

            Effective communication and cooperation between dentists and dental technicians are essential in providing quality services. There has been a lack of information regarding dentist-dental technician communications and current methods and materials used for the fabrication of fixed partial dentures (FPDs).
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Quality of communication between dental practitioners and dental technicians for fixed prosthodontics in Ireland.

              The aim of this investigation was to examine the quality of communication between dental practitioners and dental technicians for fixed prosthodontics in Ireland. A pre-piloted questionnaire was distributed to large commercial laboratories in Ireland. Information was sought relating to the quality of written instructions and use of impression trays and materials for two forms of fixed prosthodontics--full veneer porcelain-fused-to-metal crowns (PFMs), and conventional fixed partial dentures (FPDs). Information was received relating to 241 items (145 PFMs, 96 FPDs). All items were funded privately. Using pre-determined grading criteria, poor or no written instructions were provided in 55% of cases examined (n=128). Fifty-four per cent of master impressions were (n=129) made using a plastic stock tray. Three-quarters of written instructions for FPDs (n=73) did not specify the number of pontics to be included in its design. Despite the existence of various legal and ethical guidelines relating to the prescription and fabrication of fixed prostheses, more than one-half of the written instructions and master impressions examined in this study were inadequate.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Br Dent J
                Br Dent J
                British Dental Journal
                British Dental Journal
                0007-0610
                1476-5373
                26 September 2014
                : 217
                : 6
                : E12
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Clinical Lecturer, Department of Adult Oral Health, Institute of Dentistry, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London , London
                [2 ]Senior Technical Instructor, Prosthodontic Unit, UCL Eastman Dental Institute , London
                [3 ]Senior Lecturer, Department of Restorative Dentistry, Prosthodontics Unit, UCL Eastman Dental Institute , London
                Author notes
                Article
                sj.bdj.2014.643
                10.1038/sj.bdj.2014.643
                4340155
                25257016
                6eee212f-f462-48b8-ac31-4dd33396c9a4
                Copyright © 2014, Nature Publishing Group

                This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/

                History
                : 19 June 2014
                Categories
                Article

                Comments

                Comment on this article