Spatial and temporal distribution of stream macroalgae in a tropical river basin

There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

Abstract

Spatial and temporal distribution of stream macroalgae in streams from southeastern Brazil were assessed for one year. The fluctuations in macroalgal species composition and environmental factors were monitored monthly. The region exhibit a tropical climate, with defined rainy and dry seasons. Nineteen species were found, with a predominance of Chlorophyta (52.7% of the species), followed by Cyanobacteria (26.3%), Ochrophyta and Rhodophyta (10.5% each). Scytonema arcangeli had the highest number of records (63.6%), while Mougeotia capucina occurred in all sampling sites. Community structure had low similarity (20-26%) and the environmental factors showed a weak contribution to the distribution pattern observed. Despite this, the light availability at the stream-bed seems to be a major influence on the macroalgal seasonal dynamics. We suggest that macroalgae communities are predominantly composed of rare species, and this could explain the lack of a clear spatial and temporal variation pattern of these organisms.

Translated abstract

A distribuição espacial e temporal das macroalgas lóticas em riachos do sudeste do Brasil foram avaliadas por um ano. As flutuações na composição de espécies de macroalgas e fatores ambientais foram monitorados mensalmente. A região apresenta um clima tropical, com estações chuvosas e secas definidas. Dezenove espécies foram encontradas, com predomínio de Chlorophyta (52,7% das espécies), seguido por Cianobactérias (26,3%), Ochrophyta e Rhodophyta (10,5% cada). Scytonema arcangeli teve o maior número de registros (63,6%), enquanto Mougeotia capucina ocorreu em todos os pontos de amostragem. A estrutura da comunidade teve baixa similaridade (20-26%) e os fatores ambientais mostraram uma fraca contribuição para o padrão de distribuição observado. Apesar disso, a disponibilidade de luz no leito do riacho parece ser de grande influência sobre a dinâmica sazonal de macroalgas. Nós sugerimos que as comunidades de macroalgas são predominantemente compostas por espécies raras, e isso poderia explicar a falta de um padrão claro de variação espacial e temporal desses organismos.

Related collections

Most cited references 26

Record: found
Abstract: found
Article: not found

Contrasts between habitat generalists and specialists: an empirical extension to the basic metacommunity framework.

Jurek Kolasa, Suchitra Pandit, Karl Cottenie (2009)

Emergence of the metacommunity concept has made a substantial contribution to better understanding of the community composition and dynamics in a regional context. However, long-term field data for testing of available metacommunity models are still scarce, and the extent to which these models apply to the real world remains unknown. Tests conducted so far have largely sought to fit data on the entire regional set of species to one of several metacommunity models, implicitly assuming that all species operate similarly over the same set of sites. However, species differ in their habitat use. These differences can, in the most general terms, be expressed as a gradient of habitat specialization (ranging from habitat specialists to habitat generalists). We postulate that such differences in habitat specialization will have implications for metacommunity dynamics. Specifically, we predict that specialists respond more to local processes and generalists respond to regional spatial processes. We tested these predictions using natural microcosm communities for which long-term (nine-year) environmental and population dynamics data were available. We used redundancy analysis to determine the proportion of variation explained by environmental and spatial factors. We repeated this analysis to explain variation in the entire regional set of species, in generalist species only, and in specialists only. We further used ANOVA to test for differences in the proportions of explained variation. We found that habitat specialists responded primarily to environmental factors and habitat generalists responded mainly to spatial factors. Thus, from the metacommunity perspective, the dynamics of habitat specialists are best explained by a combination of species sorting and mass effects, while that of habitat generalists are best explained by patch dynamics and neutral models. Consequently, we infer that a natural metacommunity can exhibit complicated dynamics, with some groups of species (e.g., habitat specialists) governed according to environmental processes and other groups (e.g., habitat generalists) governed mainly by dispersal processes.