16
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Current and experimental treatments of Parkinson disease: A guide for neuroscientists

      1 , 2 , 3 , 4
      Journal of Neurochemistry
      Wiley

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Over a period of more than 50 years, the symptomatic treatment of the motor symptoms of Parkinson disease (PD) has been optimized using pharmacotherapy, deep brain stimulation, and physiotherapy. The arsenal of pharmacotherapies includes L-Dopa, several dopamine agonists, inhibitors of monoamine oxidase (MAO)-B and catechol-o-methyltransferase (COMT), and amantadine. In the later course of the disease, motor complications occur, at which stage different oral formulations of L-Dopa or dopamine agonists with long half-life, a transdermal application or parenteral pumps for continuous drug supply can be subscribed. Alternatively, the patient is offered deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) or the internal part of the globus pallidus (GPi). For a more efficacious treatment of motor complications, new formulations of L-Dopa, dopamine agonists, and amantadine as well as new MAO-B and COMT inhibitors are currently tested in clinical trials, and some of them already yielding positive results in phase 3 trials. In addition, non-dopaminergic agents have been tested in the early clinical phase for the treatment of motor fluctuations and dyskinesia, including adenosine A2A antagonists (istradefylline, preladenant, and tozadenant) and modulators of the metabolic glutamate receptor 5 (mGluR5 - mavoglurant) and serotonin (eltoprazine) receptors. Recent clinical trials testing coenzyme Q10, the dopamine agonist pramipexole, creatine monohydrate, pioglitazone, or AAV-mediated gene therapy aimed at increasing expression of neurturin, did not prove efficacious. Treatment with nicotine, caffeine, inosine (a precursor of urate), and isradipine (a dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker), as well as active and passive immunization against α-synuclein and inhibitors or modulators of α-synuclein-aggregation are currently studied in clinical trials. However, to date, no disease-modifying treatment is available. We here review the current status of treatment options for motor and non-motor symptoms, and discuss current investigative strategies for disease modification. This review provides basic insights, mainly addressing basic scientists and non-specialists. It stresses the need to intensify therapeutic PD research and points out reasons why the translation of basic research to disease-modifying therapies has been unsuccessful so far. The symptomatic treatment of the motor symptoms of Parkinson disease (PD) has been constantly optimized using pharmacotherapy (L-Dopa, several dopamine agonists, inhibitors of monoamine oxidase (MAO)-B and catechol-o-methyltransferase (COMT), and amantadine), deep brain stimulation, and physiotherapy. For a more efficacious treatment of motor complications, new formulations of L-Dopa, dopamine agonists, and amantadine as well as new MAO-B and COMT inhibitors are currently tested in clinical trials. Non-dopaminergic agents have been tested in the early clinical phase for the treatment of motor fluctuations and dyskinesia. Recent clinical trials testing coenzyme Q10, the dopamine agonist pramipexole, creatine monohydrate, pioglitazone, or AAV-mediated gene therapy aimed at increasing expression of neurturin, did not prove efficacious. Treatment with nicotine, caffeine, and isradipine - a dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker - as well as active and passive immunization against α-synuclein and inhibitors of α-synuclein-aggregation are currently studied in clinical trials. However, to date, no disease-modifying treatment is available for PD. We here review the current status of treatment options and investigative strategies for both motor and non-motor symptoms. This review stresses the need to intensify therapeutic PD research and points out reasons why the translation of basic research to disease-modifying therapies has been unsuccessful so far. This article is part of a special issue on Parkinson disease.

          Related collections

          Most cited references57

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Continuous intrajejunal infusion of levodopa-carbidopa intestinal gel for patients with advanced Parkinson's disease: a randomised, controlled, double-blind, double-dummy study.

          Levodopa is the most effective therapy for Parkinson's disease, but chronic treatment is associated with the development of potentially disabling motor complications. Experimental studies suggest that motor complications are due to non-physiological, intermittent administration of the drug, and can be reduced with continuous delivery. We aimed to assess efficacy and safety of levodopa-carbidopa intestinal gel delivered continuously through an intrajejunal percutaneous tube. In our 12-week, randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, double-titration trial, we enrolled adults (aged ≥ 30 years) with advanced Parkinson's disease and motor complications at 26 centres in Germany, New Zealand, and the USA. Eligible participants had jejunal placement of a percutaneous gastrojejunostomy tube, and were then randomly allocated (1:1) to treatment with immediate-release oral levodopa-carbidopa plus placebo intestinal gel infusion or levodopa-carbidopa intestinal gel infusion plus oral placebo. Randomisation was stratified by site, with a mixed block size of 2 or 4. The primary endpoint was change from baseline to final visit in motor off-time. We assessed change in motor on-time without troublesome dyskinesia as a prespecified key secondary outcome. We assessed efficacy in a full-analysis set of participants with data for baseline and at least one post-baseline assessment, and imputed missing data with the last observation carried forward approach. We assessed safety in randomly allocated patients who underwent the percutaneous gastrojejunostomy procedure. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, numbers NCT00660387 and NCT0357994. From baseline to 12 weeks in the full-analysis set, mean off-time decreased by 4.04 h (SE 0.65) for 35 patients allocated to the levodopa-carbidopa intestinal gel group compared with a decrease of 2.14 h (0.66) for 31 patients allocated to immediate-release oral levodopa-carbidopa (difference -1.91 h [95% CI -3.05 to -0.76]; p=0.0015). Mean on-time without troublesome dyskinesia increased by 4.11 h (SE 0.75) in the intestinal gel group and 2.24 h (0.76) in the immediate-release oral group (difference 1.86 [95% CI 0.56 to 3.17]; p=0.0059). In the safety analyses 35 (95%) of 37 patients allocated to the levodopa-carbidopa intestinal gel group had adverse events (five [14%] serious), as did 34 (100%) of 34 patients allocated to the immediate-release oral levodopa-carbidopa group (seven [21%] serious), mainly associated with the percutaneous gastrojejunostomy tube. Continuous delivery of levodopa-carbidopa with an intestinal gel offers a promising option for control of advanced Parkinson's disease with motor complications. Benefits noted with intestinal gel delivery were of a greater magnitude than were those obtained with medical therapies to date, and our study is, to our knowledge, the first demonstration of the benefit of continuous levodopa delivery in a double-blind controlled study. AbbVie. Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Induction of α-synuclein aggregate formation by CSF exosomes from patients with Parkinson’s disease and dementia with Lewy bodies

            Stuendl et al. show that CSF exosomes of patients with Parkinson’s disease or dementia with Lewy bodies contain α-synuclein and induce α-synuclein aggregation in a reporter cell line. Thus, exosomes may support inter-neuronal transmission of α-synuclein pathology. CSF exosomal α-synuclein may serve as a biomarker in α-synuclein-related neurodegeneration.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              A five-year study of the incidence of dyskinesia in patients with early Parkinson's disease who were treated with ropinirole or levodopa.

              There is debate about whether the initial treatment for patients with Parkinson's disease should be levodopa or a dopamine agonist. In this prospective, randomized, double-blind study, we compared the safety and efficacy of the dopamine D2-receptor agonist ropinirole with that of levodopa over a period of five years in 268 patients with early Parkinson's disease. If symptoms were not adequately controlled by the assigned study medication, patients could receive supplementary levodopa, administered in an open-label fashion. The primary outcome measure was the occurrence of dyskinesia. Eighty-five of the 179 patients in the ropinirole group (47 percent) and 45 of the 89 patients in the levodopa group (51 percent) completed all five years of the study. In the ropinirole group 29 of the 85 patients (34 percent) received no levodopa supplementation. The analysis of the time to dyskinesia showed a significant difference in favor of ropinirole (hazard ratio for remaining free of dyskinesia, 2.82; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.78 to 4.44; P<0.001). At five years, the cumulative incidence of dyskinesia (excluding the three patients who had dyskinesia at base line), regardless of levodopa supplementation, was 20 percent (36 of 177 patients) in the ropinirole group and 45 percent (40 of 88 patients) in the levodopa group. There was no significant difference between the two groups in the mean change in scores for activities of daily living among those who completed the study. Adverse events led to the early withdrawal from the study of 48 of 179 patients in the ropinirole group (27 percent) and 29 of 89 patients in the levodopa group (33 percent). The mean (+/-SD) daily doses given by the end of the study were 16.5+/-6.6 mg of ropinirole (plus 427+/-221 mg of levodopa in patients who received supplementation) and 753+/-398 mg of levodopa (including supplements). Early Parkinson's disease can be managed successfully for up to five years with a reduced risk of dyskinesia by initiating treatment with ropinirole alone and supplementing it with levodopa if necessary.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Journal of Neurochemistry
                J. Neurochem.
                Wiley
                00223042
                October 2016
                October 2016
                August 30 2016
                : 139
                : 325-337
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Neurology; Hertie-Senior Research Professorship; Philipps University Marburg; Baldingerstrasse; Marburg Germany
                [2 ]Institute for Neurogenomics; Helmholtz Institute for Health and Environment; München Germany
                [3 ]Department of Neurology; University Hospital; RWTH Aachen University; Aachen Germany
                [4 ]JARA-BRAIN Institute Molecular Neuroscience and Neuroimaging; Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH and RWTH Aachen University; Aachen Germany
                Article
                10.1111/jnc.13750
                27577098
                6f438f8c-e8b9-48a5-ba61-f283400c5ef7
                © 2016

                http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1.1

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article