0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Effects of pre- and postpartum nutrition on reproduction in spring calving cows and calf feedlot performance 1

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          ABSTRACT

          Crossbred, spring-calving cows (yr 1, n = 136; yr 2, n = 113; yr 3, n = 113) were used in a 3-yr experiment to evaluate the influence of supplemental protein prepartum and grazing subirrigated meadow postpartum on pregnancy rates and calf feedlot performance. A 2 × 2 factorial arrangement of treatments was used in a switchback design. From December 1 to February 28, cows grazed dormant upland range in 8 pastures (32 ± 2 ha each). The equivalent of 0.45 kg of supplement/cow per d (42% CP) was provided to half of the cows on a pasture basis 3 d/wk. For 30 d before the beginning of breeding (May 1 to May 31), half of the cows grazed a common subirrigated meadow (58 ha), and the remainder was fed grass hay in a drylot. Cow BW and BCS were monitored throughout the year, and steer calf performance was determined until slaughter. Feeding supplement prepartum improved ( P = 0.01 to P < 0.001) BCS precalving (5.1 vs. 4.7) and prebreeding (5.1 vs. 4.9) and increased ( P = 0.02) the percentage of live calves at weaning (98.5 vs. 93.6%) but did not affect ( P = 0.46) pregnancy rate (93 vs. 90%). Calves born to dams fed supplement prepartum had similar ( P = 0.29) birth weight (37 vs. 36 kg) but greater ( P = 0.02) weaning weight (218 vs. 211 kg). However, steer feedlot DMI (8.53 vs. 8.48 kg), ADG (1.6 vs. 1.6 kg), and carcass weight (369 vs. 363 kg) were not affected ( P = 0.23 to P = 0.89) by prepartum supplementation. Allowing cows to graze subirrigated meadow postpartum improved ( P < 0.001) BCS prebreeding (5.2 vs. 4.9) but did not affect ( P = 0.88) pregnancy rate (92 vs. 91%). Allowing cows to graze subirrigated meadow increased ( P = 0.01) calf weaning weight (218 vs. 211 kg) but not ( P = 0.62 to P = 0.91) feedlot DMI (8.4 vs. 8.3 kg), ADG (1.6 vs. 1.6 kg), or carcass weight (363 vs. 362 kg) of their steer calves. Increased percentage of live calves at weaning as a result of feeding supplemental protein increased net returns at weaning and after finishing in the feedlot. Net returns were increased by allowing cows to graze subirrigated meadow postpartum regardless of whether calves were marketed at weaning or after finishing in the feedlot.

          Related collections

          Most cited references18

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Carcass composition in mature Hereford cows: estimation and effect on daily metabolizable energy requirement during winter.

          Seventy-two mature, nonpregnant, nonlactating Hereford cows (400 kg) were utilized in a comparative slaughter trial to investigate the effects of carcass composition on the metabolizable energy (ME) required for maintenance in winter. Body condition score (CS), live weight (LW) and weight:height ratio (WTHT) were evaluated and compared as estimators of carcass composition in cows. Cows ranged in LW, CS and WTHT from 275 to 595 kg, 2.0 to 8.0 units and 2.29 to 4.62 kg/cm, respectively. Live weight, CS and WTHT predicted total carcass energy (TMCAL, r2 = .81, .85 and .83), carcass fat (FAT, r2 = .78, .82 and .80), carcass protein (PRO, r2 = .71, .74 and .70) and carcass water (WAT, r2 = .78, .71 and .77) with similar accuracy. When composition was expressed on a per unit weight basis, CS was superior to LW and WTHT as predictors of TMCAL/hot carcass weight, TMCAL/LW and FAT/hot carcass weight (r2 = .82, .60 and .64; .83, .58 and .62; and .82, .64 and .68, respectively). Forty-seven cows were individually fed a complete diet (2.50 Mcal ME/dry matter) in drylot for 114 d in yr 1 and 115 d in yr 2. Daily feed intakes were adjusted each week to maintain constant LW throughout the winter. Data were analyzed by fitting the model: ME intake = k-1 (carcass energy change) + f(CS)LW.75, where k = efficiency of ME use for carcass energy change and f(CS) = function of CS. Year as a class variable and the expression .1028 + .0234(CS) - .0025(CS)2 accounted for 41% of the variation in Mcal ME for maintenance/LW.75. Condition score was more closely related to carcass composition in mature cows than was LW or WTHT and cows in either a thin (CS = 3) condition or a fat (CS = 7) condition required less (4.4% and 8.9%) Mcal ME/LW.75 for maintenance than cows in moderate (CS = 5) condition.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Nutrition and postpartum rebreeding in cattle.

            R D Randel (1990)
            Body weight and condition score, although perhaps imprecise or subjective, are functional indicators of energy status and rebreeding performance after calving. Inadequate precalving and(or) postcalving energy or protein nutrition lowers pregnancy rates as well as first-service conception rates and extends postpartum intervals in suckled postpartum beef females. Normal nutritional regimens for dairy cows that are fed for maximal lactation do not exhibit long postpartum intervals or reduced fertility. Yet excessive protein intake may depress postpartum rebreeding performance, especially in older dairy cows. Feeding of ionophores, with increased ruminal propionate levels in the rumen, results in an earlier return to estrus postpartum. Underfeeding of the postpartum cow extends the period of ovarian inactivity. The underfed postpartum cow's lack of ovarian activity appears to be due to a suppression of the pulsatile release of LH from the anterior pituitary gland, which in turn is controlled by release of GnRH from the hypothalamus. Some metabolic compound(s) presumably act on the hypothalamic-pituitary-ovarian axis as the nutritional state of the animal is altered.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Passive immune status at postpartum hour 24 and long-term health and performance of calves.

              We quantified the effect of passive immune status on pre- and postweaning health and growth performance of calves raised in a beef production environment. Blood samples were collected at postpartum hour 24 from 263 crossbred calves for determination of plasma protein (PP) and serum IgG concentrations. Serum IgG concentration was classified as adequate (> 1,600 mg/dl), marginal (800 to 1,600 mg/dl), or inadequate ( or = 4.8 g/dl) or inadequate (< 4.8 g/dl). Morbidity and mortality events in the study population were monitored from birth to weaning, and after weaning throughout the feeding period. The lowest concentrations of serum IgG and PP were observed among calves that experienced morbidity or mortality prior to weaning. Calves that experienced morbidity in the feedlot had lower 24-hour PP values, but had IgG concentration similar to that in calves that were not observed to be ill during the feeding period. Calves classified as having inadequate IgG concentration were at greater risk of preweaning mortality (odds ratio [OR] = 5.4), neonatal morbidity (OR = 6.4), and preweaning morbidity (OR = 3.2), compared with calves classified as having adequate IgG concentration at 24 hours. Calves classified as having inadequate PP concentration at 24 hours had a greater risk of morbidity (OR = 3.0) and respiratory tract morbidity (OR = 3.1) while in the feedlot, compared with calves classified as having adequate PP concentration. The effects of 24-hour passive immune status on calf growth were indirect through effects on morbidity outcomes.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                J Anim Sci
                J. Anim. Sci
                ansci
                Journal of Animal Science
                Oxford University Press
                0021-8812
                1525-3163
                September 2006
                : 84
                : 9
                : 2582-2589
                Affiliations
                [* ]Department of Animal Science, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln 68583
                []West Central Research and Extension Center, North Platte, NE 69101
                []Panhandle Research and Extension Center, Scottsbluff, NE 69316
                Author notes
                [3 ]Corresponding author: tklopfenstein1@ 123456unl.edu
                [2]

                Current address: 112 Withycombe Hall, Oregon State University, Corvallis 97331.

                Article
                10.2527/jas.2005-640
                7109832
                16908664
                6fb6cf68-a377-477c-ac59-f23fc5751b70
                Copyright 2006 Journal of Animal Science

                This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the COVID-19 pandemic or until permissions are revoked in writing. Upon expiration of these permissions, PMC is granted a perpetual license to make this article available via PMC and Europe PMC, consistent with existing copyright protections.

                History
                : 03 November 2006
                : 21 April 2006
                Page count
                Pages: 8
                Categories
                Animal Production
                Management

                beef cattle,feedlot performance,reproduction,supplementation,system

                Comments

                Comment on this article