2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy versus Laparoscopic Ureterolithotomy or Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in the Management of Large Proximal Ureteral Stones: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          To provide a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies comparing ureterolithotripsy (URS) with percutaneous nephrolithotripsy (PCNL) or laparoscopic ureterolithotomy (LU) techniques for the management of large proximal ureteral stones (diameter greater than 10 mm).

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Urol. Int.
          Urologia internationalis
          S. Karger AG
          1423-0399
          0042-1138
          2017
          : 99
          : 3
          Affiliations
          [1 ] Department of Urology, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, China.
          Article
          000471773
          10.1159/000471773
          28586770
          7013fac2-d85d-4843-955a-b2175ff48400
          History

          Ureteroscopic lithotripsy,Laparoscopic ureterolithotomy,Large proximal ureteral stones,Meta-analysis,Percutaneous nephrolithotomy

          Comments

          Comment on this article