Blog
About

0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      New Legal Landscapes: (Re)Constructing the Boundaries of Mental Capacity Law.

      1

      Medical law review

      Oxford University Press (OUP)

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          This article explores the development of law and policy relating to mental capacity law, situating this within the context of the binaries that have driven this development. Whilst the story of this historical development is well worn, considering it through this lens allows some of the previously hidden problematic consequences of these binaries to come to the fore in our debates. The article will expose these issues through considering the binary between capacity and incapacity, and the interlinked binaries of empowerment/protection and autonomy/paternalism underpinning policies and debate in this area. It will be shown that the struggles around the boundaries of this framework are becoming more pressing given the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (UNCRPD), which presents a more fluid and potentially transformative framework for thinking about the legal subject in this context. There is here a danger, however, that we may end up falling too easily into seeing these issues through our current framework and in turn missing the opportunity to realise the potential of the UNCRPD. The article will disrupt and denaturalise the 'given-ness' of these conceptual boundaries, drawing on theoretical insights that seek to foreground relationality and the dynamic nature and processes of law. This opens the space in which to reimagine alternative trajectories for legal and ethical responses to take, and to provoke new conceptual pathways.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Med Law Rev
          Medical law review
          Oxford University Press (OUP)
          1464-3790
          0967-0742
          May 01 2018
          : 26
          : 2
          Affiliations
          [1 ] School of Law, Centre for Law & Social Justice, University of Leeds, UK.
          Article
          4956381
          10.1093/medlaw/fwy012
          29618100

          Comments

          Comment on this article