2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Causal contributions of human frontal eye fields to distinct aspects of decision formation

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Several theories propose that perceptual decision making depends on the gradual accumulation of information that provides evidence in favour of one of the choice-options. The outcome of this temporally extended integration process is thought to be categorized into the ‘winning’ and ‘losing’ choice-options for action. Neural correlates of corresponding decision formation processes have been observed in various frontal and parietal brain areas, among them the frontal eye-fields (FEF). However, the specific functional role of the FEFs is debated. Recent studies in humans and rodents provide conflicting accounts, proposing that the FEF either accumulate the choice-relevant information or categorize the outcome of such evidence integration into discrete actions. Here, we used transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) on humans to interfere with either left or right FEF activity during different timepoints of perceptual decision-formation. Stimulation of either FEF affected performance only when delivered during information integration but not during subsequent categorical choice. However, the patterns of behavioural changes suggest that the left-FEF contributes to general evidence integration, whereas right-FEF may direct spatial attention to the contralateral hemifield. Taken together, our results indicate an FEF involvement in evidence accumulation but not categorization, and suggest hemispheric lateralization for this function in the human brain.

          Related collections

          Most cited references41

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Neuronal correlates of parametric working memory in the prefrontal cortex.

          Humans and monkeys have similar abilities to discriminate the difference in frequency between two mechanical vibrations applied sequentially to the fingertips. A key component of this sensory task is that the second stimulus is compared with the trace left by the first (base) stimulus, which must involve working memory. Where and how is this trace held in the brain? This question was investigated by recording from single neurons in the prefrontal cortex of monkeys while they performed the somatosensory discrimination task. Here we describe neurons in the inferior convexity of the prefrontal cortex whose discharge rates varied, during the delay period between the two stimuli, as a monotonic function of the base stimulus frequency. We describe this as 'monotonic stimulus encoding', and we suggest that the result may generalize: monotonic stimulus encoding may be the basic representation of one-dimensional sensory stimulus quantities in working memory. Thus we predict that other behavioural tasks that require ordinal comparisons between scalar analogue stimuli would give rise to monotonic responses similar to those reported here.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Neural correlates of a decision in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex of the macaque.

            To make a visual discrimination, the brain must extract relevant information from the retina, represent appropriate variables in the visual cortex and read out this representation to decide which of two or more alternatives is more likely. We recorded from neurons in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (areas 8 and 46) of the rhesus monkey while it performed a motion discrimination task. The monkey indicated its judgment of direction by making appropriate eye movements. As the monkey viewed the motion stimulus, the neural response predicted the monkey's subsequent gaze shift, hence its judgment of direction. The response comprised a mixture of high-level oculomotor signals and weaker visual sensory signals that reflected the strength and direction of motion. This combination of sensory integration and motor planning could reflect the conversion of visual motion information into a categorical decision about direction and thus give insight into the neural computations behind a simple cognitive act.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Transcranial magnetic stimulation in cognitive neuroscience--virtual lesion, chronometry, and functional connectivity.

              Fifteen years after its introduction by Anthony Barker, transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) appears to be 'coming of age' in cognitive neuroscience and promises to reshape the way we investigate brain-behavior relations. Among the many methods now available for imaging the activity of the human brain, magnetic stimulation is the only technique that allows us to interfere actively with brain function. As illustrated by several experiments over the past couple of years, this property of TMS allows us to investigate the relationship between focal cortical activity and behavior, to trace the timing at which activity in a particular cortical region contributes to a given task, and to map the functional connectivity between brain regions.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                carolina.murd@ut.ee
                Journal
                Sci Rep
                Sci Rep
                Scientific Reports
                Nature Publishing Group UK (London )
                2045-2322
                30 April 2020
                30 April 2020
                2020
                : 10
                : 7317
                Affiliations
                [1 ]ISNI 0000 0004 1937 0650, GRID grid.7400.3, Zurich Center for Neuroeconomics, Department of Economics, University of Zurich, ; Rämistrasse 71, Zurich, 8006 Switzerland
                [2 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2156 2780, GRID grid.5801.c, Decision Neuroscience Lab, Department of Health Sciences and Technology, ETH Zurich, ; Rämistrasse 101, Zurich, 8092 Switzerland
                [3 ]ISNI 0000 0001 0943 7661, GRID grid.10939.32, Present Address: Department of Penal Law, School of Law, University of Tartu, ; Teatri väljak 3, Tallinn, 10143 Estonia
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9789-3383
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1911-2742
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3964-2364
                Article
                64064
                10.1038/s41598-020-64064-7
                7193618
                32355294
                70842630-cda4-4328-b57e-84bcaa106ce3
                © The Author(s) 2020

                Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

                History
                : 4 June 2019
                : 7 April 2020
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef https://doi.org/10.13039/501100002301, Eesti Teadusagentuur (Estonian Research Council);
                Award ID: PUTJD102
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: FundRef https://doi.org/10.13039/501100001711, Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (Swiss National Science Foundation);
                Award ID: MHV 171345
                Award Recipient :
                Categories
                Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2020

                Uncategorized
                decision,perception
                Uncategorized
                decision, perception

                Comments

                Comment on this article