50
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Definitions, Foundations and Associations of Physical Literacy: A Systematic Review

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          The concept of physical literacy has stimulated increased research attention in recent years—being deployed in physical education, sport participation, and the promotion of physical activity. Independent research groups currently operationalize the construct differently.

          Objective

          The purpose of this systematic review was to conduct a systematic review of the physical literacy construct, as reflected in contemporary research literature.

          Methods

          Five databases were searched using the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines for systematic reviews. Inclusion criteria were English language, peer reviewed, published by March 2016, and seeking to conceptualize physical literacy. Articles that met these criteria were analyzed in relation to three core areas: properties/attributes, philosophical foundations and theoretical associations with other constructs. A total of 50 published articles met the inclusion criteria and were analyzed qualitatively using inductive thematic analysis.

          Results

          The thematic analysis addressed the three core areas. Under definitions, core attributes that define physical literacy were identified, as well as areas of conflict between different approaches currently being adopted. One relatively clear philosophical approach was prominent in approximately half of the papers, based on a monist/holistic ontology and phenomenological epistemology. Finally, the analysis identified a number of theoretical associations, including health, physical activity and academic performance.

          Conclusions

          Current literature contains different representations of the physical literacy construct. The costs and benefits of adopting an exclusive approach versus pluralism are considered. Recommendations for both researchers and practitioners focus on identifying and clearly articulating the definitions, philosophical assumptions and expected outcomes prior to evaluating the effectiveness of this emerging concept.

          Electronic supplementary material

          The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s40279-016-0560-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

          Related collections

          Most cited references75

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Book Chapter: not found

            Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Book: not found

              Analyzing Qualitative Data

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Loedwards@cardiffmet.ac.uk
                Journal
                Sports Med
                Sports Med
                Sports Medicine (Auckland, N.z.)
                Springer International Publishing (Cham )
                0112-1642
                1179-2035
                30 June 2016
                30 June 2016
                2017
                : 47
                : 1
                : 113-126
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Cardiff School of Sport, Cardiff Metropolitan University, Cyncoed Campus, Cardiff, CF23 6XD UK
                [2 ]Faculty of Health, Research Institute for Sport and Exercise, University of Canberra, Bruce, ACT Australia
                Article
                560
                10.1007/s40279-016-0560-7
                5215133
                27365029
                7089e2e1-fee4-40a6-a0fd-ef19920de884
                © The Author(s) 2016

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

                History
                Categories
                Systematic Review
                Custom metadata
                © Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2017

                Comments

                Comment on this article