20
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Comparative study between epidural morphine and bupivacaine with epidural clonidine and bupivacaine for postoperative pain relief in abdominal surgeries

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background:

          Many adjuvants are used to increase the efficacy of epidural local anesthetics for postoperative analgesia.

          Aims:

          The aim was to compare the efficacy of epidural morphine (0.1 mg/kg) and clonidine (2 μg/kg) with bupivacaine (0.125%) for postoperative analgesia in abdominal surgeries.

          Settings and Design:

          Double-blind retrospective randomized study.

          Methodology:

          All the patients ( n = 60) varying from age group belonging to American Society of Anesthesiologists I–II were randomly allocated to receive epidural analgesia Group A - Morphine (0.1 mg/kg). + Bupivacaine (0.125%) ( n = 30), Group B - Clonidine (2 μ/kg) + Bupivacaine (0.125%) ( n = 30). We monitored vitals and requirement of inhalational gases intra-operatively, pain by visual analogue score (VAS) and vitals postoperatively. We used rescue analgesics (injection diclofenac 1 mg/kg intravenous) when VAS score > 5. Postoperatively, various parameters were monitored for first 2 h at intervals of 30 min and at 4, 8, 12, 16, and 24 hourly intervals after giving 1 st dose.

          Statistical Analysis Used:

          Continuous data are analyzed by Student's t-test (paired ‘ t’-test for intragroup variations and unpaired ‘ t’-test for intergroup variations). Chi-square test was used for categorical data. A P ≤ 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.

          Results:

          Mean duration of analgesia was 8.35 ± 0.42 h in Group A (morphine) and 7.45 ± 0.44 h in Group B (clonidine). This difference was statistically significant ( P < 0.001), indicating a prolongation of analgesia in group morphine. There was no need of rescue analgesia in any subjects. Group A patients were hemodynamically stable and required less inhalation agents intra-operatively compared to group B patients.

          Conclusions:

          Epidural morphine plus bupivacaine has a longer duration of analgesia and greater hemodynamic stability as compared to epidural clonidine plus bupivacaine for postoperative analgesia in abdominal surgeries.

          Related collections

          Most cited references13

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Randomized controlled trial comparing morphine or clonidine with bupivacaine for caudal analgesia in children undergoing upper abdominal surgery.

          Various additives have been used to increase the duration of analgesia provided by bupivacaine administered by single-shot caudal injection in children.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Analgesic and hemodynamic effects of epidural clonidine, clonidine/morphine, and morphine after pancreatic surgery--a double-blind study.

            This study characterizes analgesia an hemodynamics after epidural clonidine 8 micrograms/kg (Group C) or clonidine 4 micrograms/kg+morphine 2 mg (Group CM) in comparison to epidural morphine 50 micrograms/kg (Group M). Forty-five patients scheduled for pancreatectomy in combined general/epidural anesthesia were studied. The study drugs were administered 75 min postoperatively and for 10 h pain intensity (visual analog scale [VAS]), heart rate (HR), mean arterial pressure (MAP), and cardiac output (CO) were measured; filling pressures were kept > 5 mm Hg. Adequate analgesia could be achieved within 1 h in all patients of Groups C and CM, but only in six patients of Group M (P < 0.001). Quality of analgesia was comparable in all groups (VAS reduction 82% +/- 20%, mean +/- SD) but duration of analgesic action was longer in Groups CM (586 +/- 217 min) and M (775 +/- 378 min) compared to Group C (336 +/- 119 min) (P < 0.001). In Group M, no hemodynamic alterations occurred. In Groups C and CM, HR, CO, and MAP were reduced significantly compared to baseline within the first 15-90 min, while stroke volume and systemic vascular resistance remained stable. We conclude, that hemodynamic alteration after epidural clonidine under conditions of stable filling pressures is caused mainly by a decrease in HR. It is not an effect of analgesia but of the intrinsic antihypertensive action of clonidine.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Postoperative analgesia with extradural clonidine.

              The analgesic effect of extradural clonidine was evaluated in a double-blind study. In the recovery room, following orthopaedic or perineal surgery 20 ASA I and II patients were allocated randomly to two groups. The extradural clonidine (EC) group received clonidine 2 micrograms kg-1 in isotonic saline solution 15 micrograms ml-1. The extradural saline (ES) group received the equivalent volume of plain isotonic saline solution. Pain was evaluated by a visual analogue scale (VAS) at 15-min intervals for the first 2 h and subsequently at 30-min intervals for the following 4 h. Morphine 5 mg was given s.c. when patients complained of pain after extradural saline or clonidine. In the EC group, the mean (SD) maximum pain relief was 68.2 (24.1)% of the initial VAS score, but it was only 14.7 (25.2)% in the ES group. The mean duration of analgesia, before injection of morphine, was significantly longer in the EC group (210 (87) min) compared with the ES group (45 (27) min) (P less than 0.001). Drowsiness and moderate hypotension were observed in the EC group.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Anesth Essays Res
                Anesth Essays Res
                AER
                Anesthesia, Essays and Researches
                Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd (India )
                0259-1162
                2229-7685
                Jan-Apr 2015
                : 9
                : 1
                : 28-33
                Affiliations
                [1]Department of Anaesthesiology, B J Medical College, Civil Hospital, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India
                Author notes
                Corresponding author: Dr. Tapan Parikh, Unit 24/44, Cape Street, Osborne Park, Perth WA 6017 Australia. E-mail: tapanpainclinic@ 123456gmail.com
                Article
                AER-9-28
                10.4103/0259-1162.150159
                4383131
                25886417
                708c5384-0e97-4746-975c-b1be9887e8bb
                Copyright: © Anesthesia: Essays and Researches

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                Categories
                Original Article

                epidural,postoperative analgesia,visual analog score

                Comments

                Comment on this article