12
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Signalling pathways and mechanisms of protection in pre- and postconditioning: historical perspective and lessons for the future.

      1 ,
      British journal of pharmacology

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Ischaemic pre- and postconditioning are potent cardioprotective interventions that spare ischaemic myocardium and decrease infarct size after periods of myocardial ischaemia/reperfusion. They are dependent on complex signalling pathways involving ligands released from ischaemic myocardium, G-protein-linked receptors, membrane growth factor receptors, phospholipids, signalling kinases, NO, PKC and PKG, mitochondrial ATP-sensitive potassium channels, reactive oxygen species, TNF-α and sphingosine-1-phosphate. The final effector is probably the mitochondrial permeability transition pore and the signalling produces protection by preventing pore formation. Many investigators have worked to produce a roadmap of this signalling with the hope that it would reveal where one could intervene to therapeutically protect patients with acute myocardial infarction whose hearts are being reperfused. However, attempts to date to show efficacy of such an intervention in large clinical trials have been unsuccessful. Reasons for this inability to translate successes in the experimental laboratory to the clinical arena are evaluated in this review. It is suggested that all patients with acute coronary syndromes currently presenting to the hospital and being treated with platelet P2Y12 receptor antagonists, the current standard of care, are indeed already benefiting from protection from the conditioning pathways outlined earlier. If that proves to be the case, then future attempts to further decrease infarction will have to rely on interventions which protect by a different mechanism.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Br. J. Pharmacol.
          British journal of pharmacology
          1476-5381
          0007-1188
          Apr 2015
          : 172
          : 8
          Affiliations
          [1 ] Department of Physiology, University of South Alabama College of Medicine, Mobile, AL, USA; Department of Medicine, University of South Alabama College of Medicine, Mobile, AL, USA.
          Article
          10.1111/bph.12903
          4386972
          25205071
          708f0a7c-922c-4617-9ce8-8928e4a1ca5e
          © 2014 The British Pharmacological Society.
          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article