48
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Clinically Applicable Machine Learning Approaches to Identify Attributes of Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) for Use in Low-Cost Diagnostic Screening

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a major public health concern worldwide. High costs of late-stage diagnosis and insufficient testing facilities can contribute to high morbidity and mortality rates in CKD patients, particularly in less developed countries. Thus, early diagnosis aided by vital parameter analytics using affordable computer-aided diagnosis could not only reduce diagnosis costs but improve patient management and outcomes. Methods: In this study, we developed machine learning models using selective key pathological categories to identify clinical test attributes that will aid in accurate early diagnosis of CKD. Such an approach will save time and costs for diagnostic screening. We have also evaluated the performance of several classifiers with k-fold cross-validation on optimized datasets derived using these selected clinical test attributes. Results: Our results suggest that the optimized datasets with important attributes perform well in diagnosis of CKD using our proposed machine learning models. Furthermore, we evaluated clinical test attributes based on urine and blood tests along with clinical parameters that have low costs of acquisition. The predictive models with the optimized and pathologically categorized attributes set yielded high levels of CKD diagnosis accuracy with random forest (RF) classifier being the best performing. Conclusions: Our machine learning approach has yielded effective predictive analytics for CKD screening which can be developed as a resource to facilitate improved CKD screening for enhanced and timely treatment plans.

          Related collections

          Most cited references45

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          KDOQI US commentary on the 2012 KDIGO clinical practice guideline for the evaluation and management of CKD.

          The National Kidney Foundation-Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative (NKF-KDOQI) guideline for evaluation, classification, and stratification of chronic kidney disease (CKD) was published in 2002. The KDOQI guideline was well accepted by the medical and public health communities, but concerns and criticisms arose as new evidence became available since the publication of the original guidelines. KDIGO (Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes) recently published an updated guideline to clarify the definition and classification of CKD and to update recommendations for the evaluation and management of individuals with CKD based on new evidence published since 2002. The primary recommendations were to retain the current definition of CKD based on decreased glomerular filtration rate or markers of kidney damage for 3 months or more and to include the cause of kidney disease and level of albuminuria, as well as level of glomerular filtration rate, for CKD classification. NKF-KDOQI convened a work group to write a commentary on the KDIGO guideline in order to assist US practitioners in interpreting the KDIGO guideline and determining its applicability within their own practices. Overall, the commentary work group agreed with most of the recommendations contained in the KDIGO guidelines, particularly the recommendations regarding the definition and classification of CKD. However, there were some concerns about incorporating the cause of disease into CKD classification, in addition to certain recommendations for evaluation and management. Copyright © 2014. Published by Elsevier Inc.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Comparing different supervised machine learning algorithms for disease prediction

            Background Supervised machine learning algorithms have been a dominant method in the data mining field. Disease prediction using health data has recently shown a potential application area for these methods. This study ai7ms to identify the key trends among different types of supervised machine learning algorithms, and their performance and usage for disease risk prediction. Methods In this study, extensive research efforts were made to identify those studies that applied more than one supervised machine learning algorithm on single disease prediction. Two databases (i.e., Scopus and PubMed) were searched for different types of search items. Thus, we selected 48 articles in total for the comparison among variants supervised machine learning algorithms for disease prediction. Results We found that the Support Vector Machine (SVM) algorithm is applied most frequently (in 29 studies) followed by the Naïve Bayes algorithm (in 23 studies). However, the Random Forest (RF) algorithm showed superior accuracy comparatively. Of the 17 studies where it was applied, RF showed the highest accuracy in 9 of them, i.e., 53%. This was followed by SVM which topped in 41% of the studies it was considered. Conclusion This study provides a wide overview of the relative performance of different variants of supervised machine learning algorithms for disease prediction. This important information of relative performance can be used to aid researchers in the selection of an appropriate supervised machine learning algorithm for their studies.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Explaining prediction models and individual predictions with feature contributions

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                IEEE J Transl Eng Health Med
                IEEE J Transl Eng Health Med
                0063400
                JTEHM
                IJTEBN
                IEEE Journal of Translational Engineering in Health and Medicine
                IEEE
                2168-2372
                2021
                15 April 2021
                : 9
                : 4900511
                Affiliations
                [1 ]departmentDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, institutionUniversity of Rajshahi, institutionringgold 118869; Rajshahi6205Bangladesh
                [2 ]departmentDepartment of Hematopathology, institutionThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, institutionringgold 4002; HoustonTX77030USA
                [3 ]institutioniThree Institute, University of Technology Sydney, institutionringgold 1994; NSW2007Australia
                [4 ]departmentDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, institutionImam Muhammad Ibn Saud Islamic University, institutionringgold 48024; Riyadh13318Saudi Arabia
                [5 ]divisionBone Biology Division, institutionGarvan Institute of Medical Research, institutionringgold 2785; DarlinghurstNSW2010Australia
                [6 ]divisionWHO Collaborating Centre of eHealth, School of Public Health and Community Medicine, institutionUniversity of New South Wales, institutionringgold 7800; SydneyNSW2052Australia
                Article
                4900511
                10.1109/JTEHM.2021.3073629
                8075287
                33948393
                70962975-b723-4dda-a14a-d71750793516
                Copyright @ 2021

                This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License. For more information, see https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

                History
                : 13 December 2020
                : 21 February 2021
                : 12 April 2021
                : 26 April 2021
                Page count
                Figures: 7, Tables: 3, Equations: 10, References: 49, Pages: 11
                Categories
                Article

                attribute selection,chronic kidney disease (ckd),computer-aided diagnosis,explainable ai,machine learning (ml)

                Comments

                Comment on this article