+1 Recommend
1 collections
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found

      Dose Requirements among Hemodialysis Patients Treated with Darbepoetin-α or Epoetin-β

      Read this article at

          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.


          Background/Aims: In a cohort of hemodialysis patients, we evaluated the hypothesis that weekly administration of intravenous (IV) darbepoetin-α (DA) was associated with lower total erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA) requirements as compared to a regimen of multiple subcutaneous (SC) doses per week of epoetin-β (EB). Methods: We studied 1,159 hemodialysis patients who were treated exclusively with either IV DA or SC EB across a network of Portuguese clinics during 2004. Linear regression was used to assess the adjusted relationship between the ESA regimen and weekly ESA requirements over the period of observation. Generalized estimating equations were applied in order to model the population average effects of the correlated mean weekly ESA dose for each individual. We also calculated propensity scores for the receipt of DA and assessed the relationship between ESA type and dose requirement within each quintile of the score. Results: The adjusted dose of IV DA, when expressed as a proportion of the dose used in EB-treated patients, did not differ from the dose administered to EB recipients (0.961, 95% CI 0.904, 1.021). A similar relationship was observed within each propensity score quintile. Conclusions: Hemodialysis patients who received IV DA had dose requirements that were similar to their counterparts who were treated with SC EB. A once-weekly dosing regimen and avoidance of SC administration enhance the attractiveness of DA as an alternative to traditional ESAs. The potential for unmeasured confounding, restriction to a population that was treated with a single ESA preparation and application of a 200 IU:1 µg EB:DA dose conversion are important limitations of this study.

          Related collections

          Most cited references 10

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Correction of the anemia of end-stage renal disease with recombinant human erythropoietin. Results of a combined phase I and II clinical trial.

          We administered recombinant human erythropoietin to 25 anemic patients with end-stage renal disease who were undergoing hemodialysis. The recombinant human erythropoietin was given intravenously three times weekly after dialysis, and transfusion requirements, hematocrit, ferrokinetics, and reticulocyte responses were monitored. Over a range of doses between 15 and 500 units per kilogram of body weight, dose-dependent increases in effective erythropoiesis were noted. At 500 units per kilogram, changes in the hematocrit of as much as 10 percentage points were seen within three weeks, and increases in ferrokinetics of three to four times basal values, as measured by erythron transferrin uptake, were observed. Of 18 patients receiving effective doses of recombinant human erythropoietin, 12 who had required transfusions no longer needed them, and in 11 the hematocrit increased to 35 percent or more. Along with the rise in hematocrit, four patients had an increase in blood pressure, and a majority had increases in serum creatinine and potassium levels. No organ dysfunction or other toxic effects were observed, and no antibodies to the recombinant hormone were formed. These results demonstrate that recombinant human erythropoietin is effective, can eliminate the need for transfusions with their risks of immunologic sensitization, infection, and iron overload, and can restore the hematocrit to normal in many patients with the anemia of end-stage renal disease.
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Randomized, controlled trial of darbepoetin alfa for the treatment of anemia in hemodialysis patients.

            Darbepoetin alfa (Aranesp; Amgen, Thousand Oaks, CA) is a new erythropoiesis-stimulating protein with a threefold longer terminal half-life than recombinant human erythropoietin (epoetin) in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). The purpose of this randomized, double-blind, noninferiority study is to determine whether darbepoetin alfa is as effective as epoetin for the treatment of anemia in hemodialysis patients when administered at a reduced dosing frequency. Patients receiving epoetin therapy were randomized to continue epoetin administered intravenously (IV) three times weekly (n = 338) or change to darbepoetin alfa administered IV once weekly (n = 169). The dose of darbepoetin alfa or epoetin was individually titrated to maintain hemoglobin concentrations within -1.0 to +1.5 g/dL (-10 to +15 g/L) of patients' baseline values and within a range of 9.0 to 13.0 g/dL (90 to 130 g/L) for up to 28 weeks (20-week dose-titration period followed by an 8-week evaluation period). The primary end point was change in hemoglobin level between baseline and the evaluation period (weeks 21 to 28). Mean changes in hemoglobin levels from baseline to the evaluation period were 0.24 +/- 0.10 (SE) g/dL (2.4 +/- 1.0 g/L) in the darbepoetin alfa group and 0.11 +/- 0.07 g/dL (1.1 +/- 0.7 g/L) in the epoetin group, a difference of 0.13 g/dL (95% confidence interval [CI], -0.08 +/- 0.33 [1.3 g/L; 95% CI, -0.8 to 3.3]). This difference was not statistically significant or clinically relevant despite the reduced frequency of darbepoetin alfa administration. The safety profile of darbepoetin alfa was similar to that of epoetin, and no antibody formation to either treatment was detected. These results show that darbepoetin alfa maintains hemoglobin concentrations as effectively and safely as epoetin in patients with CKD, but with a reduced dosing frequency. Copyright 2002 by the National Kidney Foundation, Inc.
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Randomized trial of darbepoetin alfa for treatment of renal anemia at a reduced dose frequency compared with rHuEPO in dialysis patients.

               Johannes Mann,  ,  J. Gray (2002)
              Darbepoetin alfa is a glycoprotein with a three-fold longer terminal half-life than recombinant human erythropoietin (rHuEPO). We aimed to determine whether darbepoetin alfa is as effective and well tolerated as rHuEPO for treating renal anemia in dialysis patients when administered at a reduced dose frequency. A total of 522 European and Australian hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis patients receiving stable rHuEPO therapy by either the intravenous (IV) or subcutaneous (SC) route were randomized, open-label in a 1:2 ratio to continue rHuEPO or to receive an equivalent dose of darbepoetin alfa at a reduced dose frequency. Patients receiving rHuEPO once weekly changed to once every other week darbepoetin alfa, and those receiving rHuEPO two or three times weekly changed to once-weekly darbepoetin alfa. The doses of rHuEPO and darbepoetin alfa were titrated to maintain hemoglobin close to the patient's baseline level for up to 52 weeks. The primary endpoint was the change in hemoglobin between baseline and the evaluation period at weeks 25 to 32 of treatment. The mean change in hemoglobin from baseline to the evaluation period was similar in the darbepoetin alfa (-0.03 g/dL; SE 0.11) and rHuEPO (-0.06 g/dL; SE 0.13) groups, and the difference between the two treatments was 0.03 g/dL (95% CI -0.16, 0.21). This was not a statistically significant or clinically relevant difference, despite the reduced frequency of darbepoetin alfa administration. At the end of the evaluation period, >/=95% of patients had their hemoglobin successfully maintained on their assigned dose frequency for darbepoetin alfa (once weekly and once every other week) and rHuEPO (once, twice and three times weekly). The safety profiles of darbepoetin alfa and rHuEPO were similar, and no antibodies to either treatment were detected. Darbepoetin alfa maintains hemoglobin as effectively as rHuEPO, but with a reduced dose frequency.

                Author and article information

                Nephron Clin Pract
                Nephron Clinical Practice
                S. Karger AG
                October 2007
                21 August 2007
                : 107
                : 2
                : c50-c55
                aGambro Healthcare, Sintra, Portugal; bGambro Healthcare, Lund, Sweden; cInstitute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts-New England Medical Center, Boston, Mass., USA; dAdvanced Magnetics, Inc., Cambridge, Mass., USA; eDivision of Nephrology and the Keenan Research Centre in the Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute of St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto, Ont., Canada
                107554 Nephron Clin Pract 2007;107:c50–c55
                © 2007 S. Karger AG, Basel

                Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug. Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.

                Page count
                Tables: 4, References: 19, Pages: 1
                Original Paper


                Comment on this article