4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      A systematic review of interventions for loneliness among older adults living in long-term care facilities

      1 , 2 , 3 , 2 , 3 , 3 , 4
      Aging & Mental Health
      Informa UK Limited

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references23

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Influences on Loneliness in Older Adults: A Meta-Analysis

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The psychosocial effects of a companion robot: a randomized controlled trial.

            To investigate the psychosocial effects of the companion robot, Paro, in a rest home/hospital setting in comparison to a control group. Randomized controlled trial. Residents were randomized to the robot intervention group or a control group that attended normal activities instead of Paro sessions. Sessions took place twice a week for an hour over 12 weeks. Over the trial period, observations were conducted of residents' social behavior when interacting as a group with the robot. As a comparison, observations were also conducted of all the residents during general activities when the resident dog was or was not present. A residential care facility in Auckland, New Zealand. Forty residents in hospital and rest home care. Residents completed a baseline measure assessing cognitive status, loneliness, depression, and quality of life. At follow-up, residents completed a questionnaire assessing loneliness, depression, and quality of life. During observations, behavior was noted and collated for instances of talking and stroking the dog/robot. In comparison with the control group, residents who interacted with the robot had significant decreases in loneliness over the period of the trial. Both the resident dog and the seal robot made an impact on the social environment in comparison to when neither was present. Residents talked to and touched the robot significantly more than the resident dog. A greater number of residents were involved in discussion about the robot in comparison with the resident dog and conversation about the robot occurred more. Paro is a positive addition to this environment and has benefits for older people in nursing home care. Paro may be able to address some of the unmet needs of older people that a resident animal may not, particularly relating to loneliness. Copyright © 2013 American Medical Directors Association, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              The impact of technology on older adults’ social isolation

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Aging & Mental Health
                Aging & Mental Health
                Informa UK Limited
                1360-7863
                1364-6915
                October 11 2019
                October 11 2019
                : 1-11
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Biological Sciences, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA;
                [2 ] Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA;
                [3 ] Office for the Study of Aging, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA;
                [4 ] Health Promotion, Education, and Behavior, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA
                Article
                10.1080/13607863.2019.1673311
                31602993
                70e579cf-4a56-4273-9e18-67177c4d86ef
                © 2019
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article