11
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Interpreting Degree Semantics

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Contemporary research in compositional, truth-conditional semantics often takes judgments of the relative unacceptability of certain phrasal combinations as evidence for lexical semantics. For example, observing that completely full sounds perfectly natural whereas completely tall does not has been used to motivate a distinction whereby the lexical entry for full but not for tall specifies a scalar endpoint. So far, such inferences seem unobjectionable. In general, however, applying this methodology can lead to dubious conclusions. For example, observing that slightly bent is natural but slightly cheap is not (that is, not without a “too cheap” interpretation) leads researchers to suggest that the interpretation of bent involves a scalar minimum but cheap does not, contra intuition—after all, one would think that what is minimally cheap is (just) free. Such claims, found in sufficient abundance, raise the question of how we can support semantic theories that posit properties of entities that those entities appear to lack. This paper argues, using theories of adjectival scale structure as a test case, that the (un)acceptability data recruited in semantic explanations reveals properties of a two-stage system of semantic interpretation that can support divergences between our semantic and metaphysical intuitions.

          Related collections

          Most cited references67

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Preverbal and verbal counting and computation.

          We describe the preverbal system of counting and arithmetic reasoning revealed by experiments on numerical representations in animals. In this system, numerosities are represented by magnitudes, which are rapidly but inaccurately generated by the Meck and Church (1983) preverbal counting mechanism. We suggest the following. (1) The preverbal counting mechanism is the source of the implicit principles that guide the acquisition of verbal counting. (2) The preverbal system of arithmetic computation provides the framework for the assimilation of the verbal system. (3) Learning to count involves, in part, learning a mapping from the preverbal numerical magnitudes to the verbal and written number symbols and the inverse mappings from these symbols to the preverbal magnitudes. (4) Subitizing is the use of the preverbal counting process and the mapping from the resulting magnitudes to number words in order to generate rapidly the number words for small numerosities. (5) The retrieval of the number facts, which plays a central role in verbal computation, is mediated via the inverse mappings from verbal and written numbers to the preverbal magnitudes and the use of these magnitudes to find the appropriate cells in tabular arrangements of the answers. (6) This model of the fact retrieval process accounts for the salient features of the reaction time differences and error patterns revealed by experiments on mental arithmetic. (7) The application of verbal and written computational algorithms goes on in parallel with, and is to some extent guided by, preverbal computations, both in the child and in the adult.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            General semantics

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Methodological solipsism considered as a research strategy in cognitive psychology

              J A Fodor (1980)
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Psychol
                Front Psychol
                Front. Psychol.
                Frontiers in Psychology
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1664-1078
                30 January 2020
                2019
                : 10
                : 2972
                Affiliations
                School of Philosophy, University of Southern California , Los Angeles, CA, United States
                Author notes

                Edited by: M. Teresa Espinal, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Spain

                Reviewed by: Elena Castroviejo, IKERBASQUE Basque Foundation for Science, Spain; Christopher Kennedy, University of Chicago, United States

                *Correspondence: Alexis Wellwood wellwood@ 123456usc.edu

                This article was submitted to Language Sciences, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychology

                Article
                10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02972
                7002435
                70f9296b-e237-4958-9121-cdc39f51ab47
                Copyright © 2020 Wellwood.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 17 October 2019
                : 16 December 2019
                Page count
                Figures: 2, Tables: 0, Equations: 0, References: 122, Pages: 14, Words: 14052
                Funding
                Funded by: National Science Foundation 10.13039/100000001
                Categories
                Psychology
                Hypothesis and Theory

                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                scale structure,truth conditional meaning,semantic anomaly,language and mind,compositional semantics

                Comments

                Comment on this article