7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Noninvasive differentiation of pulmonary arterial and venous hypertension using conventional and Doppler tissue imaging echocardiography.

      Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography
      Cardiac Catheterization, Cross-Sectional Studies, Echocardiography, Doppler, Female, Hemodynamics, Humans, Hypertension, Pulmonary, physiopathology, ultrasonography, Male, Middle Aged, Pulmonary Artery, Pulmonary Veins, ROC Curve, Systole

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          To determine whether pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) and pulmonary venous hypertension (PVH) can be differentiated noninvasively, we reviewed data on 44 patients with pulmonary artery systolic pressure greater than or equal to 40 mm Hg by echocardiography and cardiac catheterization performed within 7 days of each other. Based on left ventricular end-diastolic pressure or pulmonary capillary wedge pressure, 20 patients were classified as having PVH and 24 as having PAH. Early (E) and late (A) diastolic mitral inflow velocities, deceleration time, early diastolic mitral annular velocity (E'), and E/A and E/E' ratios were remeasured in the two groups. Compared with patients with PAH, those with PVH had significantly higher E (107.8 +/- 27.3 vs 65.0 +/- 24.0 cm/s, P < .001), E/A (2.4 +/- 1.0 vs 0.9 +/- 0.4, P < .001), and E/E' (14.3 +/- 4.3 vs 5.1 +/- 1.9, P < .001), and significantly lower A (55.5 +/- 33.5 vs 74.1 +/- 20.8 cm/s, P < .001), E' (8.0 +/- 2.5 vs 13.1 +/- 3.6 cm/s, P = .001), and deceleration time (148.5 +/- 49.0 vs 192.3 +/- 41.9 milliseconds, P = .003). The area under receiver operating characteristic curve was 97% for E/E' and 91% for E/A. Optimal cutoff for diagnosing PVH was 9.2 for E/E' (sensitivity 95%, specificity 96%) and 1.7 for E/A (sensitivity 75%, specificity 91%). PAH and PVH may be differentiated by readily obtainable conventional and tissue Doppler parameters.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Comments

          Comment on this article