31
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    1
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Changing Indications and Surgical Techniques for Corneal Transplantation Between 2004 and 2009 at a Tertiary Referral Center

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Purpose:

          The aim of this study is to report the indications, techniques, and clinical outcomes of corneal transplantation and investigate any changing trends in surgical techniques over a 6 year period.

          Materials and Methods:

          Records of patients who had undergone any kind of corneal transplantation at Labbafinejad Medical Center, Tehran, Iran, from January 2004 to December 2009 were reviewed to determine the indications and types of corneal transplantation. Postoperative best-corrected visual acuity, refractive error, graft clarity, and complications were reported.

          Results:

          During this period, 1859 eyes of 1624 patients with a mean age of 41.3 ± 21.3 years underwent corneal transplantation. The most common indication was keratoconus (38.4%) followed by aphakic/pseudophakic bullous keratopathy (11.7%), previous failed grafts (10.6%), infectious corneal ulcers (10.1%), non-herpetic corneal scars (7.6%), trachoma keratopathy (4.7%), stromal corneal dystrophies (4.6%), post-herpetic corneal scar (3.7%), Fuchs’ endothelial dystrophy (0.8%), and congenital hereditary endothelial dystrophy (0.4%). Techniques of corneal transplantation included penetrating keratoplasty (PKP; 70.9%), deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK; 20.1%), conventional lamellar keratoplasty (LKP; 4.4%), and Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK; 2.3%). Over the study period, there was a significant increase in the relative frequency of infectious corneal ulcers, failed grafts, and trachoma keratopathy. Additionally, a significant reduction was observed in PKP and LKP procedures, and volume of DALK and DSAEK increased significantly. At final follow-up, 69.0% of grafts were clear in the PKP group. This figure was 82.6%, 82.7%, and 97.6% in the DALK, LKP, and DSAEK groups, respectively.

          Conclusion:

          Keratoconus was the most common indication and PKP was the most prevalent technique used for corneal transplantation. However, significant changes in the indications and surgical techniques were observed from 2004 to 2009.

          Related collections

          Most cited references28

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Risk factors for corneal graft failure and rejection in the collaborative corneal transplantation studies. Collaborative Corneal Transplantation Studies Research Group.

          To evaluate comprehensively the magnitude of suspected risk factors for corneal graft failure from any cause, failure from rejection, and immunologic reaction in patients at high risk for graft failure after corneal transplantation. The records of the 457 participants in the Collaborative Corneal Transplantation Studies were reviewed. All participants had at least two quadrants of stromal vascularization and/or a history or previous graft rejection. Patients were followed for 2 to 5 years. Characteristics of the patient, study eye, donor, donor-recipient histocompatibility, and surgical procedure were examined for their association with the graft outcomes of failure from any cause, rejection failure, and immunologic reaction. Multivariate survival analysis techniques were used to estimate rates of graft outcome events and to estimate the magnitude of risk factors. Many apparent risk factors did not maintain their association with graft outcomes after adjustment for other risk factors. Young recipient age, the number of previous grafts, history of previous anterior segment surgery, preoperative glaucoma, quadrants of anterior synechiae, quadrants of stromal vessels, a primary diagnosis of chemical burn, and blood group ABO incompatibility were among the strongest risk factors identified for graft failure. Donor and corneal preservation characteristics had little influence on graft outcome. Risk of graft failure varies substantially, even within a high-risk population. The number of risk factors present should be considered by the patient and surgeon when contemplating transplantation and planning follow-up.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Trends in the indications for penetrating keratoplasty in the midwestern United States.

            To examine the leading indications and identify the changing trends for penetrating keratoplasty (PKP) in the midwestern United States. The indications for PKPs at a single center tertiary care referral practice were tabulated to assess trends from 1982 to 1996. The data analysis was prospective after 1985. Age, gender, clinical indication for PKP, date of surgery, status of the lens at the time of surgery (phakic, aphakic, pseudophakic, cataract), and any secondary diagnoses were recorded. In pseudophakic eyes, the type of intraocular lens (IOL) present at the time of surgery was noted. Correlation analysis and linear regression were used in the SAS system, version 6.12, to test for the statistical significance in increasing or decreasing trends over the span of the study. A total of 4,217 PKPs were performed on 3,263 patients. The leading indication for PKP was pseudophakic bullous keratopathy (31.5%), with 73% of these cases associated with an anterior chamber IOL, 21% associated with a posterior chamber IOL, and 6% associated with an iris-fixated IOL. Fuchs' dystrophy (23.2%), keratoconus (11.4%), corneal scarring (11.2%), failed graft (8.9%), and aphakic bullous keratopathy (7.5%) followed pseudophakic bullous keratopathy in frequency. These six groups accounted for approximately 93% of all cases performed. There were significant increasing trends in the incidence of failed grafts (p = 0.0001) and corneal scarring (p = 0.0001), and decreasing trends in the incidence of aphakic bullous keratopathy (p = 0.0001). There was a significant decreasing trend in pseudophakic bullous keratopathy from 1989 to 1996 (p = 0.0031). Pseudophakic bullous keratopathy was the leading indication for PKP in our series. This is in agreement with the data reported in other similar studies done in North America. However, unlike most of these studies, our second leading indication was Fuchs' dystrophy. This contrast may be secondary to different genetic demographics in the midwestern United States.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Clinical types of corneal transplant rejection. Their manifestations, frequency, preoperative correlates, and treatment.

              We report a retrospective series of 156 penetrating keratoplasties that were performed in 144 patients during a two-year period, with a minimum of one-year follow-up. Three different types of rejection were identified--endothelial rejection, epithelial rejection, and subepithelial infiltrates (SEIs). We also report the clinical signs, frequency, preoperative correlates, significance, and treatment of each type of rejection. The overall frequency of any kind of rejection was 29%. Endothelial rejection was seen in 21% of the grafts, epithelial rejection was seen in 10% of the grafts, and SEIs was seen in 15% of the grafts. The frequency of endothelial rejection increased with preoperative corneal vascularization. All three types of rejection decreased in frequency with the increasing age of the recipient. Endothelial rejection was more successfully treated in the cases that had no preoperative stromal vascularization.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol
                Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol
                MEAJO
                Middle East African Journal of Ophthalmology
                Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd (India )
                0974-9233
                0975-1599
                Jul-Sep 2012
                : 19
                : 3
                : 323-329
                Affiliations
                [1]Department of Ophthalmology, Ophthalmic Research Center, Labbafinejad Medical Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
                Author notes
                Corresponding Author: Dr. Sepehr Feizi, Assistant Professor of Ophthalmology, Ophthalmic Research Center, Department of Ophthalmology, Labbafinejad Medical Center, Boostan 9 Street, Pasdaran Ave., Tehran 16666, Iran. E-mail: sepehrfeizi@ 123456yahoo.com
                Article
                MEAJO-19-323
                10.4103/0974-9233.97941
                3401804
                22837628
                713fdfc3-12d6-4e52-9613-b495c8730542
                Copyright: © Middle East African Journal of Ophthalmology

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                Categories
                Original Article

                Ophthalmology & Optometry
                indication,descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty,surgical technique,deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty,penetrating keratoplasty,lamellar keratoplasty,corneal transplantation

                Comments

                Comment on this article