7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
3 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found

      Immune thrombocytopenia in a 22‐year‐old post Covid‐19 vaccine

      letter
      , M.S. 1 , , M.D. 1 ,
      American Journal of Hematology
      John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          To the Editor: A 22‐year‐old healthy male with no medication use received the Pfizer‐BioNTech BNT16B2b2 mRNA vaccine through his work as an emergency department employee. On day three, post‐vaccination, he experienced widespread petechiae (Figure 1) and gum bleeding, which prompted his presentation. He was current on his vaccines, including yearly influenza, with no history of adverse reactions. He denied respiratory and gastrointestinal complaints or a history of infection. He had no personal or family history of bleeding or autoimmune disease. Vital signs and the remainder of his exam were normal. Laboratory tests revealed normal white‐cell count, hemoglobin, and severe thrombocytopenia with a platelet count of 2 × 109/L. FIGURE 1 Purpuric lesions on the patient's upper extremity Two months prior to receiving the vaccine, the patient was evaluated at an outpatient clinic for upper respiratory symptoms. His PCR assay returned negative for SARS‐CoV‐2, and complete blood count was unremarkable with a normal platelet count of 145 × 109/L (reference range, 140–400 × 109/L). The upper respiratory symptoms resolved within a few days, and the patient had no further complaints. However, as a precautionary measure, one‐week post outpatient evaluation, he was again tested for SARS‐CoV‐2, which returned negative. At the emergency department on day 3, post‐vaccination, the following labs were normal or negative: prothrombin time, partial thromboplastin time, fibrinogen, BUN, creatine, electrolytes, bilirubin, LDH, alkaline phosphatase, albumin, globulin, total protein, and haptoglobin. The aspartate aminotransferase (42) and alanine aminotransferase (90) were mildly elevated; however, they normalized the next day. Additionally, he tested negative for HIV, Hepatitis B, Hepatitis C antibody, and Epstein–Barr Virus serology. A nasopharyngeal swab also returned negative for SARS‐CoV‐2 antigen. The patient was then admitted and given dexamethasone 40 mg daily for 4 days, a platelet transfusion, and intravenous immunoglobulin at 1 g/kg for 2 days. 1 Immunologic studies performed on day 6 for Rheumatoid factor, antibodies for Cyclic Citrullinated Peptide, Anti Centromere, Chromatin IgG, dsDNA, Jo1, Ribosomal P Protein, Ribonucleoprotein, Scleroderma, Smith, Sjogren's Syndrome B, Sm/Rnp IgG, Antinuclear Antibody (<1:80, normal <1:80) were normal. However, Sjogren's Syndrome A antibody (2.8) was elevated (normal <1 AI). On day six, post‐vaccination, petechiae and oral bleeding decreased, and the patient was discharged with a platelet count of 28 × 109/L. Based on the presentation, a platelet count <100 × 109/L, and the exclusion of alternative causes, a diagnosis of ITP was made. 1 At follow up, on day 11, the patient's platelet count normalized to 173 × 109/L, and the patient tested positive for plasma IIb/IIIa and Ia/IIa platelet autoantibodies. Sjogren's Syndrome A antibody decreased from 2.8 on day 6 to 1.5 (normal <1 AI). Moreover, complement C3 (94) was normal (reference range, 79–152 mg/dL), while complement C4 (10.9 mg/dL) was low (reference range, 16–38 mg/dL). On day 34 a repeat of the patient's abnormal immunologic studies showed a normal value of both Sjogren's syndrome A antibody (SSA AB: <0.2) and Complement C4 (27.6 mg/dL). Additionally, SARS‐CoV‐2 IgG antibody testing was performed to rule out that a previous COVID‐19 infection elicited the ITP experienced on day 3. However, SARS‐ CoV‐2 IgG was negative. As of February 16, 2021, and since the patient's discharge on day 6, he remains healthy without any evidence or symptoms of autoimmune disease. [Correction added on 22 February 2021, after first online publication: 11 February 2021]. Previous studies reported only mild or moderate adverse events following the Covid‐19 vaccine. 2 , 3 , 4 To our knowledge, outside of a report in the press, 5 , 6 this is the first case published in the medical literature of an individual, with no other cause identified and no associated illness, experiencing ITP after receiving the Pfizer‐BioNTech vaccine. The temporal relationship of the patient's presentation 3 days post‐vaccine administration suggests, but does not prove, the vaccine may be linked to the patient's ITP. Additionally, the rapid and severe drop in platelet count to 2 × 109/L is reminiscent of the abrupt onset observed in drug‐induced thrombocytopenia, which further suggests a recent etiology. 7 However, it must be noted that the incidence of ITP is about 3.3 per 100 000 adults/year. 8 Therefore, it is also plausible that this patient's diagnosis was purely coincidental, given that the United States has administered over 12 million vaccines to date. 9 Additionally, 43 448 participants were included in the Pfizer‐BioNTech trial, and no ITP was reported. 2 Moreover, considering the low complement C4 (10.9 mg/dL), mildly elevated SSA Ab (1.5), and 2 months prior, the platelet count (145 × 109/L) was near the lower limit, it is difficult to exclude alternative causes, such as an underlying autoimmune condition with pre‐existing ITP. In this scenario, the ITP became clinically apparent following the vaccine, though this patient never manifested symptoms suggestive of autoimmune disease. This case was reported to the FDA's Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) and is valuable both for post‐approval pharmacovigilance and as a foundation for clinicians to evaluate future patients with suspected ITP. Rare vaccination events are important, but do not diminish the enormous utility of vaccination and the well‐documented safety profile 2 of the Pfizer‐BioNTech BNT16B2b2 mRNA vaccine. CONFLICT OF INTEREST The authors report no conflict of interest.

          Related collections

          Most cited references8

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine

          Abstract Background Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection and the resulting coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) have afflicted tens of millions of people in a worldwide pandemic. Safe and effective vaccines are needed urgently. Methods In an ongoing multinational, placebo-controlled, observer-blinded, pivotal efficacy trial, we randomly assigned persons 16 years of age or older in a 1:1 ratio to receive two doses, 21 days apart, of either placebo or the BNT162b2 vaccine candidate (30 μg per dose). BNT162b2 is a lipid nanoparticle–formulated, nucleoside-modified RNA vaccine that encodes a prefusion stabilized, membrane-anchored SARS-CoV-2 full-length spike protein. The primary end points were efficacy of the vaccine against laboratory-confirmed Covid-19 and safety. Results A total of 43,548 participants underwent randomization, of whom 43,448 received injections: 21,720 with BNT162b2 and 21,728 with placebo. There were 8 cases of Covid-19 with onset at least 7 days after the second dose among participants assigned to receive BNT162b2 and 162 cases among those assigned to placebo; BNT162b2 was 95% effective in preventing Covid-19 (95% credible interval, 90.3 to 97.6). Similar vaccine efficacy (generally 90 to 100%) was observed across subgroups defined by age, sex, race, ethnicity, baseline body-mass index, and the presence of coexisting conditions. Among 10 cases of severe Covid-19 with onset after the first dose, 9 occurred in placebo recipients and 1 in a BNT162b2 recipient. The safety profile of BNT162b2 was characterized by short-term, mild-to-moderate pain at the injection site, fatigue, and headache. The incidence of serious adverse events was low and was similar in the vaccine and placebo groups. Conclusions A two-dose regimen of BNT162b2 conferred 95% protection against Covid-19 in persons 16 years of age or older. Safety over a median of 2 months was similar to that of other viral vaccines. (Funded by BioNTech and Pfizer; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04368728.)
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            An mRNA Vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 — Preliminary Report

            Abstract Background The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) emerged in late 2019 and spread globally, prompting an international effort to accelerate development of a vaccine. The candidate vaccine mRNA-1273 encodes the stabilized prefusion SARS-CoV-2 spike protein. Methods We conducted a phase 1, dose-escalation, open-label trial including 45 healthy adults, 18 to 55 years of age, who received two vaccinations, 28 days apart, with mRNA-1273 in a dose of 25 μg, 100 μg, or 250 μg. There were 15 participants in each dose group. Results After the first vaccination, antibody responses were higher with higher dose (day 29 enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay anti–S-2P antibody geometric mean titer [GMT], 40,227 in the 25-μg group, 109,209 in the 100-μg group, and 213,526 in the 250-μg group). After the second vaccination, the titers increased (day 57 GMT, 299,751, 782,719, and 1,192,154, respectively). After the second vaccination, serum-neutralizing activity was detected by two methods in all participants evaluated, with values generally similar to those in the upper half of the distribution of a panel of control convalescent serum specimens. Solicited adverse events that occurred in more than half the participants included fatigue, chills, headache, myalgia, and pain at the injection site. Systemic adverse events were more common after the second vaccination, particularly with the highest dose, and three participants (21%) in the 250-μg dose group reported one or more severe adverse events. Conclusions The mRNA-1273 vaccine induced anti–SARS-CoV-2 immune responses in all participants, and no trial-limiting safety concerns were identified. These findings support further development of this vaccine. (Funded by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and others; mRNA-1273 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04283461).
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Safety and Immunogenicity of Two RNA-Based Covid-19 Vaccine Candidates

              Abstract Background Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infections and the resulting disease, coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19), have spread to millions of persons worldwide. Multiple vaccine candidates are under development, but no vaccine is currently available. Interim safety and immunogenicity data about the vaccine candidate BNT162b1 in younger adults have been reported previously from trials in Germany and the United States. Methods In an ongoing, placebo-controlled, observer-blinded, dose-escalation, phase 1 trial conducted in the United States, we randomly assigned healthy adults 18 to 55 years of age and those 65 to 85 years of age to receive either placebo or one of two lipid nanoparticle–formulated, nucleoside-modified RNA vaccine candidates: BNT162b1, which encodes a secreted trimerized SARS-CoV-2 receptor–binding domain; or BNT162b2, which encodes a membrane-anchored SARS-CoV-2 full-length spike, stabilized in the prefusion conformation. The primary outcome was safety (e.g., local and systemic reactions and adverse events); immunogenicity was a secondary outcome. Trial groups were defined according to vaccine candidate, age of the participants, and vaccine dose level (10 μg, 20 μg, 30 μg, and 100 μg). In all groups but one, participants received two doses, with a 21-day interval between doses; in one group (100 μg of BNT162b1), participants received one dose. Results A total of 195 participants underwent randomization. In each of 13 groups of 15 participants, 12 participants received vaccine and 3 received placebo. BNT162b2 was associated with a lower incidence and severity of systemic reactions than BNT162b1, particularly in older adults. In both younger and older adults, the two vaccine candidates elicited similar dose-dependent SARS-CoV-2–neutralizing geometric mean titers, which were similar to or higher than the geometric mean titer of a panel of SARS-CoV-2 convalescent serum samples. Conclusions The safety and immunogenicity data from this U.S. phase 1 trial of two vaccine candidates in younger and older adults, added to earlier interim safety and immunogenicity data regarding BNT162b1 in younger adults from trials in Germany and the United States, support the selection of BNT162b2 for advancement to a pivotal phase 2–3 safety and efficacy evaluation. (Funded by BioNTech and Pfizer; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04368728.)
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                husam.tarawneh@aah.org
                Journal
                Am J Hematol
                Am J Hematol
                10.1002/(ISSN)1096-8652
                AJH
                American Journal of Hematology
                John Wiley & Sons, Inc. (Hoboken, USA )
                0361-8609
                1096-8652
                11 February 2021
                : 10.1002/ajh.26106
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Advocate Aurora Health Milwaukee Wisconsin USA
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence

                Husam S. Tarawneh, Advocate Aurora Health, 945 N 12th St, Milwaukee, WI 53233, USA.

                Email: husam.tarawneh@ 123456aah.org

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3523-9359
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3907-9620
                Article
                AJH26106
                10.1002/ajh.26106
                8014773
                33476455
                7152b32d-c81e-436f-ac76-db7554647a64
                © 2021 Wiley Periodicals LLC.

                This article is being made freely available through PubMed Central as part of the COVID-19 public health emergency response. It can be used for unrestricted research re-use and analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source, for the duration of the public health emergency.

                History
                : 18 January 2021
                : 08 January 2021
                : 19 January 2021
                Page count
                Figures: 1, Tables: 0, Pages: 2, Words: 1157
                Categories
                Correspondence
                Correspondence
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                corrected-proof
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:6.0.1 mode:remove_FC converted:01.04.2021

                Hematology
                Hematology

                Comments

                Comment on this article