27
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Scleral buckle infections: microbiological spectrum and antimicrobial susceptibility

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the microbiological spectrum and antimicrobial susceptibility in patients with scleral buckle infection. Medical records of all the patients diagnosed as buckle infection at L. V. Prasad Eye Institute between July 1992 and June 2012 were reviewed in this non-comparative, consecutive, retrospective case series.

          Findings

          A total of 132 eyes of 132 patients underwent buckle explantation for buckle infection during the study period. The incidence of buckle infection at our institute during the study period was 0.2% (31 out of 15,022). A total of 124 isolates were identified from 102 positive cultures. The most common etiological agent isolated was Staphylococcus epidermidis (27/124, 21.77%) followed by Mycobacterium sp. (20/124, 16.13%) and Corynebacterium sp. (13/124, 10.48%). The most common gram negative bacilli identified was Pseudomonas aeruginosa (9/124, 7.26%). The median interval between scleral buckling surgery and onset of symptoms of local infection was 30 days. All eyes underwent buckle explantation and median time interval between primary SB surgery and explantation was 13 months. Recurrent retinal detachment was observed in two cases at 7 and 48 months, respectively, after buckle explantation. Gram positive, gram negative, and acid-fast organisms isolated from 2003 to 2012 were most commonly susceptible to vancomycin (100%), ciprofloxacin (100%), and amikacin (89%). Susceptibility to ciprofloxacin during the same time period was observed in 75% (15/20), 100% (13/13), and 87% (7/8) of gram positive, gram negative, and acid-fast isolates, respectively.

          Conclusion

          Scleral buckle infection is relatively rare and has a delayed clinical presentation. It is most commonly caused by gram positive cocci. Based on the current antimicrobial susceptibility, ciprofloxacin can be used as empirical therapy in the management of scleral buckle infections.

          Related collections

          Most cited references23

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Surgical outcomes for primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachments in phakic and pseudophakic patients: the Retina 1 Project--report 2.

          To compare anatomical and functional outcomes for 546 phakic and pseudophakic primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachments (RDs) treated by pars plana vitrectomy or scleral buckling. Prospective, non-randomised, interventional study in 15 centres in Spain and Portugal, with data from RDs consecutively treated from January 2005 to May 2007. Cases with preoperative proliferative vitreoretinopathy grade C-1 or higher and perforating trauma were excluded. Minimum follow-up was 3 months. Twenty-seven pre-, intra- and post-surgical variables for each patient were analysed. Multivariate analysis was carried out by logistic regression analysis with stepwise selection of variables. Data from 546 patients were analysed. Global anatomical success was 94.7%. Logistic regression analysis showed that only the development of postoperative proliferative vitreoretinopathy was associated with a poor anatomical outcome. The poorest functional results were associated with macular involvement, extension of RD, previous RD surgery, time of evolution of RD, and age of patient. Hierarchical log-linear analysis showed no effect of the lens status (phakic versus pseudophakic) on the functional results. However, pars plana vitrectomy was most often performed in pseudophakic eyes and resulted in a worse final visual acuity (p<0.001). No differences in anatomical success between phakic and pseudophakic eyes were found in this series. Pars plana vitrectomy was most often performed in pseudophakic eyes and had a greater probability of a worse final visual acuity than scleral buckling.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Primary vitrectomy versus scleral buckling for the treatment of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled clinical trials.

            To compare the efficacy of pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) with that of scleral buckling (SB) in the treatment of uncomplicated, primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD). Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were performed. Phakic and pseudophakic/aphakic eyes were analyzed separately. Searches of PUBMED, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were conducted. Outcome measures included primary and final anatomic success, final visual success, and development of post-operative proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR) and/or post-operative cataract. Three RCTs of phakic eyes (n = 523) and four RCTs of pseudophakic/aphakic eyes (n = 690) were included in the meta-analysis. For the phakic group, searches of PPV and SB yielded similar results in terms of primary/final retinal re-attachment and post-operative PVR. In the SB arm, visual acuity (VA) was better (heterogeneity p = 0.14; OR = 0.50, 95%CI, 0.31-0.82; p = 0.005) and the rate of post-operative cataract lower (heterogeneity p = 0.42; OR = 4.18; 95%CI, 2.75-6.35, p < 0.00001) than in the PPV group. In the pseudophakic/aphakic group, re-attachment rates after a single operation did not differ between the two procedures (random effect model: OR = 1.77; 95% CI, 0.80-3.91; p = 0.16). Final anatomic success outcomes were in favor of PPV (OR = 1.97; 95% CI, 1.04-3.73; p = 0.04). Final visual success and post-operative PVR rates did not differ statistically between the two arms (OR = 1.49; 95%CI, 0.82-2.68; p = 0.19; and OR = 0.85; 95% CI, 0.58-1.26; p = 0.42, respectively). SB is superior in terms of final VA and occurrence of post-operative cataract in uncomplicated phakic RRDs. PPV is more likely to achieve a favorable final re-attachment in pseudophakic/aphakic RRDs.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Scleral buckle removal: indications and outcomes.

              Irena Tsui (2012)
              Primary scleral buckling has been an effective means to reattach the retina for over 50 years. After surgery, complications may arise that require scleral buckle (SB) removal. The most common indications for SB removal are extrusion, infection, and pain. I review the pertinent literature in an effort to develop guidelines for when to remove a SB. Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                J Ophthalmic Inflamm Infect
                J Ophthalmic Inflamm Infect
                Journal of Ophthalmic Inflammation and Infection
                Springer
                1869-5760
                2013
                13 December 2013
                : 3
                : 67
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Srimati Kanuri Santhamma Centre for Vitreo-Retinal Diseases, Kallam Anji Reddy Campus, L. V. Prasad Eye Institute, Hyderabad 500 034, India
                [2 ]Vitreo-Retina services. G. M. R. Varalakshmi Campus, L. V. Prasad Eye Institute, Visakhapatnam 530 040, India
                [3 ]Jhaveri Microbiology Centre, Prof. Brien Holden Eye Research Centre, Kallam Anji Reddy Campus, L.V., Prasad Eye Institute, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad 500 034, India
                [4 ]Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Miami, Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL 33136, USA
                Article
                1869-5760-3-67
                10.1186/1869-5760-3-67
                4029454
                24330530
                71dd7449-3593-42ec-8559-22bbf39b5226
                Copyright © 2013 Chhablani et al.; licensee Springer.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 16 October 2013
                : 3 December 2013
                Categories
                Brief Report

                Ophthalmology & Optometry
                buckle infection,scleral buckle,buckle,sponge
                Ophthalmology & Optometry
                buckle infection, scleral buckle, buckle, sponge

                Comments

                Comment on this article