24
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic in Central and Eastern Europe : The Rise of Autocracy and Democratic Resilience

      1
      Democratic Theory
      Berghahn Books

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The COVID-19 pandemic represents a new and unparalleled stress-test for the already disrupted liberal-representative, democracies. The challenges cluster around three democratic disfigurations: technocracy, populism, and plebiscitarianism—each have the potential to contribute to democratic decay. Still, they can also trigger pushback against illiberalism mobilizing citizens in defense of democracy, toward democratic resilience. This article looks at how the COVID-19 pandemic affects democratic decay and democratic resilience in Central and Eastern Europe (CEE). It finds varied responses to the COVID-19 crisis by the CEE populist leaders and identifies two patterns: the rise of autocracy and democratic resilience. First, in Hungary and Poland, the populist leaders instrumentalized the state of emergency to increase executive aggrandizement. Second, in the Czech Republic and Slovakia, democracy proved resilient. The COVID-19 pandemic alone is not fostering the rise of authoritarianism. However, it does accentuate existing democratic disfigurations.

          Related collections

          Most cited references26

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          On Democratic Backsliding

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Book: not found

            How Democracies Die

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Will vs. Reason: The Populist and Technocratic Forms of Political Representation and Their Critique to Party Government

              The article compares analytically populism and technocracy as alternative forms of political representation to party government. It argues that populist and technocratic principles of representation challenge fundamental features of party democracy. The two alternative forms of representation are addressed theoretically from the perspective of political representation. First, the article identifies the commonalities between the two forms of representation: both populism and technocracy are based on a unitary, nonpluralist, unmediated, and unaccountable vision of society's general interest. Second, it highlights their differences. Technocracy stresses responsibility and requires voters to entrust authority to experts who identify the general interest from rational speculation. Populism stresses responsiveness and requires voters to delegate authority to leaders who equate the general interest with a putative will of the people. While the populist form of representation has received considerable attention, the technocratic one has been neglected. The article presents a more complete picture of the analytical relationship between them.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Democratic Theory
                Berghahn Books
                2332-8894
                2332-8908
                December 1 2020
                December 1 2020
                : 7
                : 2
                : 47-60
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Institute of Sociology, Czech Academy of Sciences, Czechia, and University of Jena, Germany petraguasti@googlemail.com
                Article
                10.3167/dt.2020.070207
                71e643f4-a46a-413c-ad89-54c21132ab99
                © 2020
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article