33
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Blood pressure-lowering effects of nifedipine/candesartan combinations in high-risk individuals: subgroup analysis of the DISTINCT randomised trial

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The DISTINCT study (reDefining Intervention with Studies Testing Innovative Nifedipine GITS—Candesartan Therapy) investigated the efficacy and safety of nifedipine GITS/candesartan cilexetil combinations vs respective monotherapies and placebo in patients with hypertension. This descriptive sub-analysis examined blood pressure (BP)-lowering effects in high-risk participants, including those with renal impairment (estimated glomerular filtration rate<90 ml min −1, n=422), type 2 diabetes mellitus ( n=202), hypercholesterolaemia ( n=206) and cardiovascular (CV) risk factors ( n=971), as well as the impact of gender, age and body mass index (BMI). Participants with grade I/II hypertension were randomised to treatment with nifedipine GITS (N) 20, 30, 60 mg and/or candesartan cilexetil (C) 4, 8, 16, 32 mg or placebo for 8 weeks. Mean systolic BP and diastolic BP reductions after treatment in high-risk participants were greater, overall, with N/C combinations vs respective monotherapies or placebo, with indicators of a dose–response effect. Highest rates of BP control (ESH/ESC 2013 guideline criteria) were also achieved with highest doses of N/C combinations in each high-risk subgroup. The benefits of combination therapy vs monotherapy were additionally observed in patient subgroups categorised by gender, age or BMI. All high-risk participants reported fewer vasodilatory adverse events in the pooled N/C combination therapy than the N monotherapy group. In conclusion, consistent with the DISTINCT main study outcomes, high-risk participants showed greater reductions in BP and higher control rates with N/C combinations compared with respective monotherapies and lesser vasodilatory side-effects compared with N monotherapy.

          Related collections

          Most cited references22

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          2003 World Health Organization (WHO)/International Society of Hypertension (ISH) statement on management of hypertension.

          Hypertension is estimated to cause 4.5% of current global disease burden and is as prevalent in many developing countries, as in the developed world. Blood pressure-induced cardiovascular risk rises continuously across the whole blood pressure range. Countries vary widely in capacity for management of hypertension, but worldwide the majority of diagnosed hypertensives are inadequately controlled. This statement addresses the ascertainment of overall cardiovascular risk to establish thresholds for initiation and goals of treatment, appropriate treatment strategies for non-drug and drug therapies, and cost-effectiveness of treatment. Since publication of the WHO/ISH Guidelines for the Management of Hypertension in 1999, more evidence has become available to support a systolic blood pressure threshold of 140 mmHg for even 'low-risk' patients. In high-risk patients there is evidence for lower thresholds. Lifestyle modification is recommended for all individuals. There is evidence that specific agents have benefits for patients with particular compelling indications, and that monotherapy is inadequate for the majority of patients. For patients without a compelling indication for a particular drug class, on the basis of comparative trial data, availability, and cost, a low dose of diuretic should be considered for initiation of therapy. In most places a thiazide diuretic is the cheapest option and thus most cost effective, but for compelling indications where other classes provide additional benefits, even if more expensive, they may be more cost effective. In high-risk patients who attain large benefits from treatment, expensive drugs may be cost effective, but in low-risk patients treatment may not be cost-effective unless the drugs are cheap.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Diabetes and Cardiovascular Disease: A Statement for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Kidney disease as a risk factor for development of cardiovascular disease: a statement from the American Heart Association Councils on Kidney in Cardiovascular Disease, High Blood Pressure Research, Clinical Cardiology, and Epidemiology and Prevention.

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                J Hum Hypertens
                J Hum Hypertens
                Journal of Human Hypertension
                Nature Publishing Group
                0950-9240
                1476-5527
                March 2017
                11 August 2016
                : 31
                : 3
                : 178-188
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Unit and Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Milano-Bicocca, IRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano , Milan, Italy
                [2 ]KRK Medical Research Institute , Dallas, TX, USA
                [3 ]Hospital Universitario San Cecilio , Granada, Spain
                [4 ]Formerly in The Crouch Oak Family Practice , Addlestone, UK
                [5 ]National Research Institute , Los Angeles, CA, USA
                [6 ]Fondazione Salvatore Maugeri—IRCCS , Pavia, Italy
                [7 ]Oslo University Hospital Ullevaal, University of Oslo , Oslo, Norway
                Author notes
                [* ]Piazza dei Daini , 4, 20126 Milan, Italy. E-mail: giuseppe.mancia@ 123456unimib.it
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6238-7277
                Article
                jhh201654
                10.1038/jhh.2016.54
                5301082
                27511476
                720c750c-862b-4ac3-8f6a-ea1c47504d63
                Copyright © 2017 Macmillan Publishers Limited, part of Springer Nature.

                This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

                History
                : 07 October 2015
                : 02 March 2016
                : 14 March 2016
                Categories
                Original Article

                Cardiovascular Medicine
                Cardiovascular Medicine

                Comments

                Comment on this article