12
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Ageing out of place in COVID-19 pandemic era: how does the situation look like for older refugees in camps?

      letter
      Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics
      Elsevier B.V.

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Dear Editor, I am a PhD student at the University of New South Wales, Australia with research interest in refugee and asylum seekers health. Since the emergence of the COVID-19, I read with great interest and concern news, information and issues relating to possible and actual spread of the virus across refugee camps especially in low and middle income countries (LMIC). At the same time, colleagues and students who share the concerns of refugees in this challenging era continue to ask me how the COVID-19 would affect older refugees in camps. This letter highlights what I mostly share with friends and students and also call attention of relevant stakeholders to the plights of older refugees as the current pandemic evolves. Today, millions of older refugees are doubly-vulnerable due to old age and the refugee status and live in unideal conditions. Often, they face significant number of psychological, physical and social challenges such as poor health, anxiety, depression, stress-related psychosomatic illnesses, dementia, post-traumatic stress disorders and loss of status (Fawad et al., 2020). The physical and social conditions existing in areas where refugees live in developing countries also add to their complex vulnerability (Raju & Ayeb-Karlsson, 2020). In many cases, older refugees comparatively have limited access to medical help and health services, nutritious food, clean and quality water and hygienic sanitation (Kassem, 2020). These conditions already make older refugees chronically stressed population that is highly vulnerable to varied communicable and non-communicable diseases (Kassem, 2020; Chen, 2020). Amid this condition, a new and threatening phenomenon has emerged, namely the COVID-19 pandemic, to further exacerbate the already exiting precarious situation of older adults including older refugees (Bouillon-Minois et al., 2020; Plagg et al., 2020; Servello & Ettorre, 2020). As of 2nd June 2020, the world has recorded 6,568,510 confirmed cases of COVID-19 and 387,957 deaths (Worldometers.info, 2020). Evidence suggests that older adults are at higher risk of developing severe complications, morbidity and mortality related to the virus as a result of their relatively weaker immune system and increased number of medical comorbidities (Khoury, & Karam, 2020; Niu et al., 2020). A study by Guan et al. (2020) published in the New Journal of Medicine (NEJM) reported that the rate of older patients older than 65 years with COVID-19 infections was 15.1%, while Wu and McGoogan (2020) research published in JAMA on the other hand reported 3% for the proportion of older adults above 80 years. This evidence buttresses the susceptibility of older adults to COVID-19 infection and fatality. Indeed there has not been reports of major outbreaks or cases in refugee camps up to this, the concern is that all hosting countries continue to witness daily increase in COVID-19 cases while others continue to battle with local transmission of the virus (Kassem, 2020). For example major refugee hosting countries like USA and Turkey have reported 1,103,971 and 30,961 active cases of COVID-19 as of 2nd June, 2020 (Vieira et al., 2020). The increasing COVID-19 cases and deaths as well as local transmission may cast some shadows of doubt on the absence of major outbreaks in refugee camps (Kassem, 2020). So far to the best of my knowledge, the only refugee camp with report of confirmed COVID-19 case is the Moria camp in Lesbos, Greece (Raju & Ayeb-Karlsson, 2020). Though this is encouraging so far, there are suggestions that may explain reasons for the extremely low infection rate at refugee camps. These include 1) lack of knowledge regarding COVID-19 infection and symptoms, 2) lack of access to tests, which are limited and insufficient for the needs of the hosting countries especially in developing countries, and 3) fear of stigmatization and marginalization (Kassem, 2020). With these suggestions, refugee camps may be COVID-19 ticking bomb, waiting to explode with time, which calls for immediate isolation of older refugees and mass testing in refugee camps to avoid catastrophic morbidities and fatalities. More importantly, as COVID-19 pandemic continues to pose serious challenges and unprecedented uncertainties, countries all over the world have taken some strict measures to curb the spread of the virus including isolation (Chen, 2020; Servello & Ettorre, 2020). However, some of the measures particularly social/physical distancing and self/isolation that have been rigorously imposed on older adults including those in refugee camps have serious associated health and social effects (Kassem, 2020). For instance, self-isolation and quarantine has been found to be associated with an increased depressive and anxiety symptoms in older adults (Armitage & Nellums, 2020). Also, Cheung et al. (2008) reported that suicide rates in older adults significantly increased in Hong Kong following the 2003 severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) epidemic. Imminently, older refugees in refugee camps may pay the worst tribute of the COVID-19 pandemic, being the most at risk, and those who nay suffer most. This is because a quick assessment of the nature of the disease and ongoing rigorous containment measures reveal the potential scope of threat to mental wellbeing of older refugees. It is wealthy to note that though the containment measures may avoid an acute fatal issue, but it is also widely known that many of the older refugees have witnessed catastrophic events and experienced several levels of trauma, which affect them at a bio-psycho-social (biological, psychological and social) level. Many older refugees already need stronger psychosocial support because of their limited social networks and activities and as a result measures of social distancing and self- isolation may worsen their mental wellbeing. Again, many older refugees are associated with family separation, breakdown of family relationships, social bonds and ties. This means older refugees may find COVID-19 restrictions reminiscent of their previous social isolation experiences, which can aggravate their psychological distress. During this pandemic era, the author call for some global and urgent support for the wellbeing of this already marginalized and overlooked population. Isolating older refugees from refugee camps may be a prudent decision and providing them with opportunity to live in places with access to internet and other engaging activities (Plagg et al., 2020). This would make them socially-engaging and reduce their stress, anxiety and depressive symptoms. Moreover, information about COVID-19 should be communicated in culturally and linguistically responsive ways through diverse channels to reduce the misinformation among older refugees. Complex terminologies about COVID-19 should be stated in easy to read and understand language. International humanitarian community must act now by adopting a social protection strategy that may act as a safety net to save the lives of older refugees. Ageing out of place and being faced with everyday COVID-19 information and misinformation is dreadful but with shared responsibility, cooperation and solidarity, older refugees can have hope even in this difficult time and beyond. Declaration of Competing Interest No relevant interests to declare.

          Related collections

          Most cited references13

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Clinical Characteristics of Coronavirus Disease 2019 in China

          Abstract Background Since December 2019, when coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) emerged in Wuhan city and rapidly spread throughout China, data have been needed on the clinical characteristics of the affected patients. Methods We extracted data regarding 1099 patients with laboratory-confirmed Covid-19 from 552 hospitals in 30 provinces, autonomous regions, and municipalities in mainland China through January 29, 2020. The primary composite end point was admission to an intensive care unit (ICU), the use of mechanical ventilation, or death. Results The median age of the patients was 47 years; 41.9% of the patients were female. The primary composite end point occurred in 67 patients (6.1%), including 5.0% who were admitted to the ICU, 2.3% who underwent invasive mechanical ventilation, and 1.4% who died. Only 1.9% of the patients had a history of direct contact with wildlife. Among nonresidents of Wuhan, 72.3% had contact with residents of Wuhan, including 31.3% who had visited the city. The most common symptoms were fever (43.8% on admission and 88.7% during hospitalization) and cough (67.8%). Diarrhea was uncommon (3.8%). The median incubation period was 4 days (interquartile range, 2 to 7). On admission, ground-glass opacity was the most common radiologic finding on chest computed tomography (CT) (56.4%). No radiographic or CT abnormality was found in 157 of 877 patients (17.9%) with nonsevere disease and in 5 of 173 patients (2.9%) with severe disease. Lymphocytopenia was present in 83.2% of the patients on admission. Conclusions During the first 2 months of the current outbreak, Covid-19 spread rapidly throughout China and caused varying degrees of illness. Patients often presented without fever, and many did not have abnormal radiologic findings. (Funded by the National Health Commission of China and others.)
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found

            Characteristics of and Important Lessons From the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Outbreak in China: Summary of a Report of 72 314 Cases From the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              COVID-19 and the consequences of isolating the elderly

              As countries are affected by coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), the elderly population will soon be told to self-isolate for “a very long time” in the UK, and elsewhere. 1 This attempt to shield the over-70s, and thereby protect over-burdened health systems, comes as worldwide countries enforce lockdowns, curfews, and social isolation to mitigate the spread of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). However, it is well known that social isolation among older adults is a “serious public health concern” because of their heightened risk of cardiovascular, autoimmune, neurocognitive, and mental health problems. 2 Santini and colleagues 3 recently demonstrated that social disconnection puts older adults at greater risk of depression and anxiety. If health ministers instruct elderly people to remain home, have groceries and vital medications delivered, and avoid social contact with family and friends, urgent action is needed to mitigate the mental and physical health consequences. Self-isolation will disproportionately affect elderly individuals whose only social contact is out of the home, such as at daycare venues, community centres, and places of worship. Those who do not have close family or friends, and rely on the support of voluntary services or social care, could be placed at additional risk, along with those who are already lonely, isolated, or secluded. Online technologies could be harnessed to provide social support networks and a sense of belonging, 4 although there might be disparities in access to or literacy in digital resources. Interventions could simply involve more frequent telephone contact with significant others, close family and friends, voluntary organisations, or health-care professionals, or community outreach projects providing peer support throughout the enforced isolation. Beyond this, cognitive behavioural therapies could be delivered online to decrease loneliness and improve mental wellbeing. 5 Isolating the elderly might reduce transmission, which is most important to delay the peak in cases, and minimise the spread to high-risk groups. However, adherence to isolation strategies is likely to decrease over time. Such mitigation measures must be effectively timed to prevent transmission, but avoid increasing the morbidity of COVID-19 associated with affective disorders. This effect will be felt greatest in more disadvantaged and marginalised populations, which should be urgently targeted for the implementation of preventive strategies.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Arch Gerontol Geriatr
                Arch Gerontol Geriatr
                Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics
                Elsevier B.V.
                0167-4943
                1872-6976
                20 June 2020
                20 June 2020
                : 104149
                Affiliations
                [0005]Social Policy Research Centre, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
                Article
                S0167-4943(20)30143-6 104149
                10.1016/j.archger.2020.104149
                7305710
                32593091
                7230e476-06c1-4c8f-adc7-0b1d590c416c
                © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

                Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.

                History
                : 4 June 2020
                Categories
                Article

                Comments

                Comment on this article