320
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Redox homeostasis: the linchpin in stem cell self-renewal and differentiation

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Stem cells are characterized by their unique ability of self-renewal to maintain the so-called stem cell pool. Over the past decades, reactive oxygen species (ROS) have been recognized as toxic aerobic metabolism byproducts that are harmful to stem cells, leading to DNA damage, senescence or cell death. Recently, a growing body of literature has shown that stem cells reside in redox niches with low ROS levels. The balance of Redox homeostasis facilitates stem cell self-renewal by an intricate network. Thus, to fully decipher the underlying molecular mechanisms involved in the maintenance of stem cell self-renewal, it is critical to address the important role of redox homeostasis in the regulation of self-renewal and differentiation of stem cells. In this regard, we will discuss the regulatory mechanisms involved in the subtly orchestrated balance of redox status in stem cells by scavenger antioxidant enzyme systems that are well monitored by the hypoxia niches and crucial redox regulators including forkhead homeobox type O family (FoxOs), apurinic/apyrimidinic (AP) endonuclease1/redox factor-1 (APE1/Ref-1), nuclear factor erythroid-2-related factor 2 (Nrf2) and ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM). We will also introduce several pivotal ROS-sensitive molecules, such as hypoxia-inducible factors, p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (p38) and p53, involved in the redox-regulated stem cell self-renewal. Specifically, all the aforementioned molecules can act as ‘redox sensors' by virtue of redox modifications of their cysteine residues, which are critically important in the control of protein function. Given the importance of redox homeostasis in the regulation of stem cell self-renewal, understanding the underlying molecular mechanisms involved will provide important new insights into stem cell biology.

          Related collections

          Most cited references101

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          ROS as signalling molecules: mechanisms that generate specificity in ROS homeostasis.

          Reactive oxygen species (ROS) have been shown to be toxic but also function as signalling molecules. This biological paradox underlies mechanisms that are important for the integrity and fitness of living organisms and their ageing. The pathways that regulate ROS homeostasis are crucial for mitigating the toxicity of ROS and provide strong evidence about specificity in ROS signalling. By taking advantage of the chemistry of ROS, highly specific mechanisms have evolved that form the basis of oxidant scavenging and ROS signalling systems.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            NRF2 and cancer: the good, the bad and the importance of context.

            Many studies of chemopreventive drugs have suggested that their beneficial effects on suppression of carcinogenesis and many other chronic diseases are mediated through activation of the transcription factor NFE2-related factor 2 (NRF2). More recently, genetic analyses of human tumours have indicated that NRF2 may conversely be oncogenic and cause resistance to chemotherapy. It is therefore controversial whether the activation, or alternatively the inhibition, of NRF2 is a useful strategy for the prevention or treatment of cancer. This Opinion article aims to rationalize these conflicting perspectives by critiquing the context dependence of NRF2 functions and the experimental methods behind these conflicting data.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Suppression of induced pluripotent stem cell generation by the p53-p21 pathway.

              Induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells can be generated from somatic cells by the introduction of Oct3/4 (also known as Pou5f1), Sox2, Klf4 and c-Myc, in mouse and in human. The efficiency of this process, however, is low. Pluripotency can be induced without c-Myc, but with even lower efficiency. A p53 (also known as TP53 in humans and Trp53 in mice) short-interfering RNA (siRNA) was recently shown to promote human iPS cell generation, but the specificity and mechanisms remain to be determined. Here we report that up to 10% of transduced mouse embryonic fibroblasts lacking p53 became iPS cells, even without the Myc retrovirus. The p53 deletion also promoted the induction of integration-free mouse iPS cells with plasmid transfection. Furthermore, in the p53-null background, iPS cells were generated from terminally differentiated T lymphocytes. The suppression of p53 also increased the efficiency of human iPS cell generation. DNA microarray analyses identified 34 p53-regulated genes that are common in mouse and human fibroblasts. Functional analyses of these genes demonstrate that the p53-p21 pathway serves as a barrier not only in tumorigenicity, but also in iPS cell generation.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Cell Death Dis
                Cell Death Dis
                Cell Death & Disease
                Nature Publishing Group
                2041-4889
                March 2013
                14 March 2013
                1 March 2013
                : 4
                : 3
                : e537
                Affiliations
                [1 ] The State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, West China Hospital, Sichuan University , Chengdu 610041, People's Republic of China
                [2 ] The School of Biomedical Sciences, Chengdu Medical College , Chengdu 610083, People's Republic of China
                [3 ]Department of Urology and General Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University , Chengdu 610041, People's Republic of China
                [4 ]Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Monash University , Clayton, Victoria 3800, Australia
                Author notes
                [* ]The State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, West China Hospital, Sichuan University , 1#, Keyuan Road 4, Gaopeng Street High Tech Zone, Chengdu, Chengdu 610041, People's Republic of China. Tel: +86132 5837 0346; Fax: +8628 8516 4060; E-mail: hcanhua@ 123456hotmail.com
                Article
                cddis201350
                10.1038/cddis.2013.50
                3613828
                23492768
                723f6c46-4084-4e7a-a11e-692158a72ab4
                Copyright © 2013 Macmillan Publishers Limited

                This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/

                History
                : 10 January 2013
                : 29 January 2013
                Categories
                Review

                Cell biology
                redox homeostasis,redox modification,ros,self-renewal,stem cell
                Cell biology
                redox homeostasis, redox modification, ros, self-renewal, stem cell

                Comments

                Comment on this article