47
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Collaborations for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care: lessons from the theory of communities of practice

      research-article
      1 , , 1 , 1
      Implementation Science : IS
      BioMed Central

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          The paper combines the analytical and instrumental perspectives on communities of practice (CoPs) to reflect on potential challenges that may arise in the process of interprofessional and inter-organisational joint working within the Collaborations for Leaderships in Applied Health Research and Care (CLAHRCs)--partnerships between the universities and National Health Service (NHS) Trusts aimed at conducting applied health research and translating its findings into day-to-day clinical practice.

          Discussion

          The paper discusses seminal theoretical literature on CoPs as well as previous empirical research on the role of these communities in healthcare collaboration, which is organised around the following three themes: knowledge sharing within and across CoPs, CoP formation and manageability, and identity building in CoPs. It argues that the multiprofessional and multi-agency nature of the CLAHRCs operating in the traditionally demarcated organisational landscape of the NHS may present formidable obstacles to knowledge sharing between various professional groupings, formation of a shared 'collaborative' identity, and the development of new communities within the CLAHRCs. To cross multiple boundaries between various professional and organisational communities and hence enable the flow of knowledge, the CLAHRCs will have to create an effective system of 'bridges' involving knowledge brokers, boundary objects, and cross-disciplinary interactions as well as address a number of issues related to professional and organisational identification.

          Summary

          The CoP approach can complement traditional 'stage-of-change' theories used in the field of implementation research and provide a basis for designing theory-informed interventions and evaluations. It can help to illuminate multiple boundaries that exist between professional and organisational groups within the CLAHRCs and suggest ways of crossing those boundaries to enable knowledge transfer and organisational learning. Achieving the aims of the CLAHRCs and producing a sustainable change in the ways applied health research is conducted and implemented may be influenced by how effectively these organisations can navigate through the multiple CoPs involved and promote the development of new multiprofessional and multi-organisational communities united by shared practice and a shared sense of belonging--an assumption that needs to be explored by further empirical research.

          Related collections

          Most cited references38

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Organizational Images and Member Identification

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Provisional Selves: Experimenting with Image and Identity in Professional Adaptation

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Communities of Practice and Social Learning Systems

              L Wenger (2000)
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Implement Sci
                Implementation Science : IS
                BioMed Central
                1748-5908
                2011
                23 June 2011
                : 6
                : 64
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Manchester Business School, The University of Manchester, Booth Street West, Manchester, M15 6PB, UK
                Article
                1748-5908-6-64
                10.1186/1748-5908-6-64
                3130688
                21699712
                7240705b-1a7d-4fbb-9897-acf3a3bc58dc
                Copyright ©2011 Kislov et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 17 November 2010
                : 23 June 2011
                Categories
                Debate

                Medicine
                Medicine

                Comments

                Comment on this article