175
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Relationship between vaginal microbial dysbiosis, inflammation, and pregnancy outcomes in cervical cerclage.

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Preterm birth, the leading cause of death in children under 5 years, may be caused by inflammation triggered by ascending vaginal infection. About 2 million cervical cerclages are performed annually to prevent preterm birth. The procedure is thought to provide structural support and maintain the endocervical mucus plug as a barrier to ascending infection. Two types of suture material are used for cerclage: monofilament or multifilament braided. Braided sutures are most frequently used, although no evidence exists to favor them over monofilament sutures. We assessed birth outcomes in a retrospective cohort of 678 women receiving cervical cerclage in five UK university hospitals and showed that braided cerclage was associated with increased intrauterine death (15% versus 5%; P = 0.0001) and preterm birth (28% versus 17%; P = 0.0006) compared to monofilament suture. To understand the potential underlying mechanism, we performed a prospective, longitudinal study of the vaginal microbiome in women at risk of preterm birth because of short cervical length (≤25 mm) who received braided (n = 25) or monofilament (n = 24) cerclage under comparable circumstances. Braided suture induced a persistent shift toward vaginal microbiome dysbiosis characterized by reduced Lactobacillus spp. and enrichment of pathobionts. Vaginal dysbiosis was associated with inflammatory cytokine and interstitial collagenase excretion into cervicovaginal fluid and premature cervical remodeling. Monofilament suture had comparatively minimal impact upon the vaginal microbiome and its interactions with the host. These data provide in vivo evidence that a dynamic shift of the human vaginal microbiome toward dysbiosis correlates with preterm birth.

          Related collections

          Most cited references43

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Temporal dynamics of the human vaginal microbiota.

          Elucidating the factors that impinge on the stability of bacterial communities in the vagina may help in predicting the risk of diseases that affect women's health. Here, we describe the temporal dynamics of the composition of vaginal bacterial communities in 32 reproductive-age women over a 16-week period. The analysis revealed the dynamics of five major classes of bacterial communities and showed that some communities change markedly over short time periods, whereas others are relatively stable. Modeling community stability using new quantitative measures indicates that deviation from stability correlates with time in the menstrual cycle, bacterial community composition, and sexual activity. The women studied are healthy; thus, it appears that neither variation in community composition per se nor higher levels of observed diversity (co-dominance) are necessarily indicative of dysbiosis.
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            The composition and stability of the vaginal microbiota of normal pregnant women is different from that of non-pregnant women

            Background This study was undertaken to characterize the vaginal microbiota throughout normal human pregnancy using sequence-based techniques. We compared the vaginal microbial composition of non-pregnant patients with a group of pregnant women who delivered at term. Results A retrospective case–control longitudinal study was designed and included non-pregnant women (n = 32) and pregnant women who delivered at term (38 to 42 weeks) without complications (n = 22). Serial samples of vaginal fluid were collected from both non-pregnant and pregnant patients. A 16S rRNA gene sequence-based survey was conducted using pyrosequencing to characterize the structure and stability of the vaginal microbiota. Linear mixed effects models and generalized estimating equations were used to identify the phylotypes whose relative abundance was different between the two study groups. The vaginal microbiota of normal pregnant women was different from that of non-pregnant women (higher abundance of Lactobacillus vaginalis, L. crispatus, L. gasseri and L. jensenii and lower abundance of 22 other phylotypes in pregnant women). Bacterial community state type (CST) IV-B or CST IV-A characterized by high relative abundance of species of genus Atopobium as well as the presence of Prevotella, Sneathia, Gardnerella, Ruminococcaceae, Parvimonas, Mobiluncus and other taxa previously shown to be associated with bacterial vaginosis were less frequent in normal pregnancy. The stability of the vaginal microbiota of pregnant women was higher than that of non-pregnant women; however, during normal pregnancy, bacterial communities shift almost exclusively from one CST dominated by Lactobacillus spp. to another CST dominated by Lactobacillus spp. Conclusion We report the first longitudinal study of the vaginal microbiota in normal pregnancy. Differences in the composition and stability of the microbial community between pregnant and non-pregnant women were observed. Lactobacillus spp. were the predominant members of the microbial community in normal pregnancy. These results can serve as the basis to study the relationship between the vaginal microbiome and adverse pregnancy outcomes.
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The length of the cervix and the risk of spontaneous premature delivery. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal Fetal Medicine Unit Network.

              The role of the cervix in the pathogenesis of premature delivery is controversial. In a prospective, multicenter study of pregnant women, we used vaginal ultrasonography to measure the length of the cervix; we also documented the incidence of spontaneous delivery before 35 weeks' gestation. At 10 university-affiliated prenatal clinics, we performed vaginal ultrasonography at approximately 24 and 28 weeks of gestation in women with singleton pregnancies. We then assessed the relation between the length of the cervix and the risk of spontaneous preterm delivery. We examined 2915 women at approximately 24 weeks of gestation and 2531 of these women again at approximately 28 weeks. Spontaneous preterm delivery (at less than 35 weeks) occurred in 126 of the women (4.3 percent) examined at 24 weeks. The length of the cervix was normally distributed at 24 and 28 weeks (mean [+/- SD], 35.2 +/- 8.3 mm and 33.7 +/- 8.5 mm, respectively). The relative risk of preterm delivery increased as the length of the cervix decreased. When women with shorter cervixes at 24 weeks were compared with women with values above the 75th percentile, the relative risks of preterm delivery among the women with shorter cervixes were as follows: 1.98 for cervical lengths at or below the 75th percentile (40 mm), 2.35 for lengths at or below the 50th percentile (35 mm), 3.79 for lengths at or below the 25th percentile (30 mm), 6.19 for lengths at or below the 10th percentile (26 mm), 9.49 for lengths at or below the 5th percentile (22 mm), and 13.99 for lengths at or below the 1st percentile (13 mm) (P < 0.001 for values at or below the 50th percentile; P = 0.008 for values at or below the 75th percentile). For the lengths measured at 28 weeks, the corresponding relative risks were 2.80, 3.52, 5.39, 9.57, 13.88, and 24.94 (P < 0.001 for values at or below the 50th percentile; P = 0.003 for values at the 75th percentile). The risk of spontaneous preterm delivery is increased in women who are found to have a short cervix by vaginal ultrasonography during pregnancy.

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Sci Transl Med
                Science translational medicine
                1946-6242
                1946-6234
                Aug 3 2016
                : 8
                : 350
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Imperial College Parturition Research Group, Division of the Institute of Reproductive and Developmental Biology, Imperial College London, London W12 0NN, UK. Queen Charlotte's Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare National Health Service (NHS) Trust, London W12 0HS, UK. St. Mary's Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London W2 1NY, UK.
                [2 ] Imperial College Parturition Research Group, Division of the Institute of Reproductive and Developmental Biology, Imperial College London, London W12 0NN, UK. d.macintyre@imperial.ac.uk p.bennett@imperial.ac.uk.
                [3 ] Imperial College Parturition Research Group, Division of the Institute of Reproductive and Developmental Biology, Imperial College London, London W12 0NN, UK.
                [4 ] Centre for Digestive and Gut Health, Imperial College London, London W2 1NY, UK. School of Biosciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff CF103AX, UK.
                [5 ] School of Biosciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff CF103AX, UK.
                [6 ] Centre for Digestive and Gut Health, Imperial College London, London W2 1NY, UK.
                [7 ] Imperial College Parturition Research Group, Division of the Institute of Reproductive and Developmental Biology, Imperial College London, London W12 0NN, UK. Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London SW10 9NH, UK.
                [8 ] Imperial College Parturition Research Group, Division of the Institute of Reproductive and Developmental Biology, Imperial College London, London W12 0NN, UK. Queen Charlotte's Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare National Health Service (NHS) Trust, London W12 0HS, UK. Department of Development and Regeneration, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven 3000, Belgium.
                [9 ] Birmingham Women's Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TG, UK.
                [10 ] Urogynaecology Department, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK.
                [11 ] Centre for Digestive and Gut Health, Imperial College London, London W2 1NY, UK. Division of Computational Systems Medicine, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK.
                [12 ] St. Mary's Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London W2 1NY, UK.
                [13 ] Imperial College Parturition Research Group, Division of the Institute of Reproductive and Developmental Biology, Imperial College London, London W12 0NN, UK. Queen Charlotte's Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare National Health Service (NHS) Trust, London W12 0HS, UK. d.macintyre@imperial.ac.uk p.bennett@imperial.ac.uk.
                Article
                8/350/350ra102
                10.1126/scitranslmed.aag1026
                27488896
                72617096-9ce4-42b3-85a7-763d860820bd
                Copyright © 2016, American Association for the Advancement of Science.
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                Related Documents Log