12
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Proceso de formación y uso de estrategias de las coaliciones estado-sociedad en el tratamiento de dos proyectos de leyes ambientales en Argentina (bosques nativos y humedales) Translated title: Process of formation and use of strategies of the state-society coalitions in the treatment of two projects of environmental laws in Argentina (native forests and wetlands)

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Resumen: En contextos de booms de commodities, los procesos de formulación de leyes ambientales suelen producir debates controversiales entre diversos actores sociales y estatales, que confrontan para imponer sus visiones e intereses en torno a la normativa en cuestión. Producto de la resolución de esas confrontaciones los proyectos de leyes ambientales son aprobados o rechazados. Mediante el análisis comparativo de dos áreas de políticas ambientales (bosques nativos y humedales) que comparten, entre otras cosas, semejantes presiones productivas, este artículo busca echar luz al siguiente interrogante: ¿por qué procesos que tienen características similares producen diferentes resultados? Basado en la literatura sobre formulación de políticas públicas y coaliciones Estado-sociedad, este trabajo argumenta que la sanción de una normativa ambiental es producto de la puesta en práctica de dos estrategias conjuntas por parte de una coalición proteccionista: la estrategia institucional y la estrategia de opinión pública.

          Translated abstract

          Abstract: In commodity booms, the processes of formulation of the national environmental laws produce controversial debates among diverse social and state actors who confronts to impose their visions and interests in the laws. As results of the confrontation, the projects of environmental laws are approved or rejected. Apply a comparative analysis in two environmental areas (native forests and wetlands) that have initial similar conditions, like economic pressure, this article asks: why process with similar characteristics produce different results? Based on the literature about public policy formulation and state-society coalitions, I argue that the sanction of a national environmental regulation is the product of the implementation of two joint strategies deployed by the protectionist coalition throughout the process: the institutional strategy and the public opinion strategy.

          Related collections

          Most cited references42

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Case Selection Techniques in Case Study Research: A Menu of Qualitative and Quantitative Options

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Decision Making in Political Systems: Veto Players in Presidentialism, Parliamentarism, Multicameralism and Multipartyism

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              The Market as Prison

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                rucp
                Revista Uruguaya de Ciencia Política
                Rev. Urug. Cienc. Polít.
                Universidad de la República. Facultad de Ciencias Sociales. Instituto de Ciencia Política. (Montevideo, , Uruguay )
                0797-9789
                1688-499X
                2020
                : 29
                : 2
                : 7-32
                Affiliations
                [1] Buenos Aires orgnameUniversidad Nacional de Gral. San Martín orgdiv1Escuela de Gobierno Argentina lucasmfigueroa17@ 123456gmail.com
                Article
                S1688-499X2020000200007 S1688-499X(20)02900200007
                10.26851/rucp.29.2.1
                726c9031-2953-4d7b-a84a-28ddbaa187f8

                This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

                History
                : 11 May 2005
                : 18 August 2008
                Page count
                Figures: 0, Tables: 0, Equations: 0, References: 42, Pages: 26
                Product

                SciELO Uruguay

                Categories
                Artículo Original

                wetlands,estrategia institucional,state-society coalitions,institutional strategy,public opinion strategy,humedales,bosques nativos,políticas ambientales,coaliciones Estado-sociedad,estrategia de opinión pública,native forests,environmental policies

                Comments

                Comment on this article