+1 Recommend
1 collections
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found

      Evaluation of i-STAT Creatinine Assay

      , ,


      S. Karger AG

      Read this article at

          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.


          Background: We evaluated a new, 2-min blood creatinine method using the hand-held i-STAT analyzer. Good results have already been reported using this analyzer for 10 methods including electrolytes, TCO<sub>2</sub>, pH, PCO<sub>2</sub>, bicarbonate, glucose, hemoglobin and urea for uremic blood, hemodialysate and peritoneal effluent. Methods: Evaluation included study of imprecision and accuracy. Results: Imprecision studies gave excellent results, including those for reproducibility of 6 solutions with a mean of 10 repeats and coefficients of variation (CVs) of 0.4–3.4%, and also the mean of the differences between 33 duplicate blood specimens which was 2.2% of the specimen mean. To assess accuracy, we compared results of 149 tests by i-STAT and Beckman Synchron CX7 methods. The difference between the two means was 2.6% and the mean of all differences was 10.9% with i-STAT results higher, especially when blood creatinine values were <100 µmol/l (1.1 mg/dl) indicating the need for a slightly higher upper limit of the normal range. The correlation coefficient between the two methods was 0.99, the slope 1.0 and the intercept –5.0 µmol/l (–0.06 mg/dl). We assessed the recommended creatinine correction for variation in PCO<sub>2 </sub>above and below 40 mm Hg, but our results did not suggest the need for such a correction in our range of 27–64 mm Hg; omission would remove a major method disadvantage. Assays of hemodialysate and peritoneal effluent were also satisfactory. Conclusions: The i-STAT creatinine method is simple and rapid and our evaluation showed satisfactory accuracy and precision. However, results were on average slightly higher than for the Beckman Synchron CX7 method.

          Related collections

          Most cited references 1

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found

          i-STAT Hand-Held Point-of-Care Analyzer for Dialysis Units

          The i-STAT hand-held analyzer assays ten tests including electrolytes, gases, urea, glucose, ionized calcium, and hematocrit. Eight different cartridges assay one to eight tests. We have previously confirmed or demonstrated that accuracy and precision for blood assays are comparable to accepted laboratory methods. We now report similar results for hemodialysis dialysate and peritoneal dialysis effluent. The i-STAT analyzer is simple to use, and dialysis nurses produced accurate results with 20 min training. The results are viewed digitally on the analyzer and automatically on a small attachable printer. i-STAT blood analysis is most valuable when results are desired immediately, anywhere, including before, during and after dialysis in hemodialysis units. Hemodialysate analysis using i-STAT can be most valuable for rapidly checking dialysis machine function such as dialysate mixing and conductivity and ramping results and dialysate concentrations prepared in the unit. Peritoneal effluent analysis is useful for rapid evaluation of membrane function.

            Author and article information

            S. Karger AG
            25 May 2001
            : 88
            : 2
            : 178-182
            Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St John’s, Nfld., Canada
            45982 Nephron 2001;88:178–182
            © 2001 S. Karger AG, Basel

            Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug. Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.

            Page count
            Figures: 1, Tables: 2, References: 5, Pages: 5
            Self URI (application/pdf):
            Technical Note

            Cardiovascular Medicine, Nephrology


            Comment on this article