8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Young Children Respond to Moral Dilemmas Like Their Mothers

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          There is a large scientific interest in human moral judgments. However, little is known about the developmental origins and the specific role of the primary caregivers in the early development of inter-individual differences in human morality. Here, we assess the moral intuitions of 3- to 6-year-old children and their mothers ( N = 56), using child-friendly versions of five trolley dilemmas and two control scenarios. We found that children responded to moral dilemmas similar to their mothers, revealed by correlations between the responses of mothers and their children in all five moral dilemmas and a highly similar overall response pattern between mother and child across all judgments. This was revealed by a high agreement in the response pattern of children and their mothers. Furthermore, children’s overall response tendencies were similar to the response tendencies of adults. Thus, similar moral principles (e.g., the Doctrine of the Double Effect) which have been identified in adults, and describes as a universal moral grammar, may guide the moral intuitions in early childhood already. Taken together, the present findings provide the first evidence that children’s moral intuitions are closely associated with the moral intuitions of their mother.

          Related collections

          Most cited references24

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          The Moral Machine experiment

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The role of conscious reasoning and intuition in moral judgment: testing three principles of harm.

            Is moral judgment accomplished by intuition or conscious reasoning? An answer demands a detailed account of the moral principles in question. We investigated three principles that guide moral judgments: (a) Harm caused by action is worse than harm caused by omission, (b) harm intended as the means to a goal is worse than harm foreseen as the side effect of a goal, and (c) harm involving physical contact with the victim is worse than harm involving no physical contact. Asking whether these principles are invoked to explain moral judgments, we found that subjects generally appealed to the first and third principles in their justifications, but not to the second. This finding has significance for methods and theories of moral psychology: The moral principles used in judgment must be directly compared with those articulated in justification, and doing so shows that some moral principles are available to conscious reasoning whereas others are not.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The social dilemma of autonomous vehicles

              Autonomous vehicles (AVs) should reduce traffic accidents, but they will sometimes have to choose between two evils, such as running over pedestrians or sacrificing themselves and their passenger to save the pedestrians. Defining the algorithms that will help AVs make these moral decisions is a formidable challenge. We found that participants in six Amazon Mechanical Turk studies approved of utilitarian AVs (that is, AVs that sacrifice their passengers for the greater good) and would like others to buy them, but they would themselves prefer to ride in AVs that protect their passengers at all costs. The study participants disapprove of enforcing utilitarian regulations for AVs and would be less willing to buy such an AV. Accordingly, regulating for utilitarian algorithms may paradoxically increase casualties by postponing the adoption of a safer technology.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Psychol
                Front Psychol
                Front. Psychol.
                Frontiers in Psychology
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1664-1078
                06 December 2019
                2019
                : 10
                : 2683
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Developmental Psychology, Department of Psychology, University of Münster , Münster, Germany
                [2] 2Differential Psychology and Personality Research, Department of Psychology, Osnabrück University , Osnabrück, Germany
                [3] 3Cross-Cultural Developmental Psychology, Department of Psychology, Free University Berlin , Berlin, Germany
                Author notes

                Edited by: Yvette Renee Harris, Miami University, United States

                Reviewed by: Fanli Jia, Seton Hall University, United States; Hing Keung Ma, Hong Kong Baptist University, Hong Kong

                *Correspondence: Niklas Dworazik, n.dworazik@ 123456gmail.com

                This article was submitted to Developmental Psychology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychology

                Article
                10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02683
                6909973
                72964f82-6fe2-4d0c-826b-4569f91e760c
                Copyright © 2019 Dworazik, Kärtner, Lange and Köster.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 03 July 2019
                : 13 November 2019
                Page count
                Figures: 2, Tables: 1, Equations: 0, References: 28, Pages: 7, Words: 0
                Categories
                Psychology
                Brief Research Report

                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                moral cognition,trolley dilemma,moral development,universal moral grammar theory,parental influence

                Comments

                Comment on this article