64
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Clinical review: Practical recommendations on the management of perioperative heart failure in cardiac surgery

      review-article
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Acute cardiovascular dysfunction occurs perioperatively in more than 20% of cardiosurgical patients, yet current acute heart failure (HF) classification is not applicable to this period. Indicators of major perioperative risk include unstable coronary syndromes, decompensated HF, significant arrhythmias and valvular disease. Clinical risk factors include history of heart disease, compensated HF, cerebrovascular disease, presence of diabetes mellitus, renal insufficiency and high-risk surgery. EuroSCORE reliably predicts perioperative cardiovascular alteration in patients aged less than 80 years. Preoperative B-type natriuretic peptide level is an additional risk stratification factor. Aggressively preserving heart function during cardiosurgery is a major goal. Volatile anaesthetics and levosimendan seem to be promising cardioprotective agents, but large trials are still needed to assess the best cardioprotective agent(s) and optimal protocol(s). The aim of monitoring is early detection and assessment of mechanisms of perioperative cardiovascular dysfunction. Ideally, volume status should be assessed by 'dynamic' measurement of haemodynamic parameters. Assess heart function first by echocardiography, then using a pulmonary artery catheter (especially in right heart dysfunction). If volaemia and heart function are in the normal range, cardiovascular dysfunction is very likely related to vascular dysfunction. In treating myocardial dysfunction, consider the following options, either alone or in combination: low-to-moderate doses of dobutamine and epinephrine, milrinone or levosimendan. In vasoplegia-induced hypotension, use norepinephrine to maintain adequate perfusion pressure. Exclude hypovolaemia in patients under vasopressors, through repeated volume assessments. Optimal perioperative use of inotropes/vasopressors in cardiosurgery remains controversial, and further large multinational studies are needed. Cardiosurgical perioperative classification of cardiac impairment should be based on time of occurrence (precardiotomy, failure to wean, postcardiotomy) and haemodynamic severity of the patient's condition (crash and burn, deteriorating fast, stable but inotrope dependent). In heart dysfunction with suspected coronary hypoperfusion, an intra-aortic balloon pump is highly recommended. A ventricular assist device should be considered before end organ dysfunction becomes evident. Extra-corporeal membrane oxygenation is an elegant solution as a bridge to recovery and/or decision making. This paper offers practical recommendations for management of perioperative HF in cardiosurgery based on European experts' opinion. It also emphasizes the need for large surveys and studies to assess the optimal way to manage perioperative HF in cardiac surgery.

          Related collections

          Most cited references83

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure 2008: the Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Acute and Chronic Heart Failure 2008 of the European Society of Cardiology. Developed in collaboration with the Heart Failure Association of the ESC (HFA) and endorsed by the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM).

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            EuroHeart Failure Survey II (EHFS II): a survey on hospitalized acute heart failure patients: description of population.

            The objective of the EuroHeart Failure Survey II (EHFS II) was to assess patient characteristics, aetiology, treatment, and outcome of acute heart failure (AHF) in Europe in relation to the guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of AHF published by the European Society of Cardiology. Patients hospitalized for AHF were recruited by 133 centres in 30 European countries. Three thousand five hundred and eighty patients were entered into the database by the end of August 2005. Mean age was 70 years, and 61% of patients were male. New-onset AHF (de novo AHF) was diagnosed in 37%, of which 42% was due to acute coronary syndromes (ACS). Clinical classification according to the guidelines divided AHF patients into (i) decompensated HF (65%), (ii) pulmonary oedema (16%), (iii) HF and hypertension (11%), (iv) cardiogenic shock (4%), and (v) right HF (3%). Coronary heart disease, hypertension, and atrial fibrillation were the most common underlying conditions. Arrhythmias, valvular dysfunction, and ACS were each present as precipitating factor in one-third of cases. Preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (> or =45%) was observed in 34%. Valvular disorders were common, especially mitral regurgitation (MR) which was reported on echocardiography in 80% of patients. Median length of stay was 9 days, and in-hospital mortality 6.7%. At discharge, 80% of patients were on angiotensin-converting enzyme-inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers, whereas 61% were taking beta-blocker medication. Decompensated HF is the most common clinical presentation of AHF patients. More than one-third of AHF patients do not have a previous history of HF, and new-onset HF is often caused by ACS. Preserved systolic function is found in a substantial proportion of the patients. The prevalence of valvular dysfunction is strikingly high and contributes to the clinical presentation. The EHFS II on AHF verified that the use of evidence-based HF medication was well adopted to clinical practice.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              European system for cardiac operative risk evaluation (EuroSCORE).

              To construct a scoring system for the prediction of early mortality in cardiac surgical patients in Europe on the basis of objective risk factors. The EuroSCORE database was divided into developmental and validation subsets. In the former, risk factors deemed to be objective, credible, obtainable and difficult to falsify were weighted on the basis of regression analysis. An additive score of predicted mortality was constructed. Its calibration and discrimination characteristics were assessed in the validation dataset. Thresholds were defined to distinguish low, moderate and high risk groups. The developmental dataset had 13,302 patients, calibration by Hosmer Lemeshow Chi square was (8) = 8.26 (P 200 micromol/l (2), active endocarditis (3) and critical preoperative state (3). Cardiac factors were unstable angina on intravenous nitrates (2), reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (30-50%: 1, 60 mmHg (2). Operation-related factors were emergency (2), other than isolated coronary surgery (2), thoracic aorta surgery (3) and surgery for postinfarct septal rupture (4). The scoring system was then applied to three risk groups. The low risk group (EuroSCORE 1-2) had 4529 patients with 36 deaths (0.8%), 95% confidence limits for observed mortality (0.56-1.10) and for expected mortality (1.27-1.29). The medium risk group (EuroSCORE 3-5) had 5977 patients with 182 deaths (3%), observed mortality (2.62-3.51), predicted (2.90-2.94). The high risk group (EuroSCORE 6 plus) had 4293 patients with 480 deaths (11.2%) observed mortality (10.25-12.16), predicted (10.93-11.54). Overall, there were 698 deaths in 14,799 patients (4.7%), observed mortality (4.37-5.06), predicted (4.72-4.95). EuroSCORE is a simple, objective and up-to-date system for assessing heart surgery, soundly based on one of the largest, most complete and accurate databases in European cardiac surgical history. We recommend its widespread use.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Crit Care
                Critical Care
                BioMed Central
                1364-8535
                1466-609X
                2010
                28 April 2010
                : 14
                : 2
                : 201
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive care, INSERM UMR 942, Lariboisière Hospital, University of Paris 7 - Diderot, 2 rue Ambroise Paré, 75010 Paris, France
                [2 ]Thessaloniki Heart Institute, St Luke's Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece, 552 36
                [3 ]Intensive Care Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, Raemistrasse 100, CH 8091 Zurich, Switzerland
                [4 ]Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Medical University Graz, 8036 Graz, Austria
                [5 ]APHP, Hôpital Bichat-Claude Bernard, Département d'Anesthésie-Réanimation, University Paris 7 Denis Diderot, Unité INSERM U 698, Paris, France
                [6 ]Department of Cardiothoracic Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, S-413 45 Gothenburg, Sweden
                [7 ]Department of Nephrology Dialysis and Transplantation, San Bortolo Hospital, Viale Rodolfi 37, 36100 Vicenza, Italy
                [8 ]Department of Anaesthesiology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, 1105 Amsterdam, Netherlands
                [9 ]Department for Cardiothoracic Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, A-1090 Vienna, Austria
                [10 ]Institute of Anaesthesiology Heart and Diabetes-Center, Nordrhein-Westfalen University Clinic of Ruhr-University Bochum, Georgstrasse 11, D-32545 Bad Oeynhausen, Germany
                [11 ]Department of Cardio-Vascular Surgery, CHUV, Rue du Bugnon 46, 10113 Lausanne, Switzerland
                [12 ]Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, 10098 Berlin, Germany
                [13 ]Department of Vascular Surgery, Erasmus Medical Centre, 's Gravendijkwal 230, 3015 CE Rotterdam, the Netherlands
                [14 ]Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia and ICU, IRCCS Policlinico S Donato, 20097 Milan, Italy
                [15 ]Department of Anesthesia, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, 369 Fulham Road, London SW10 9NH, UK
                [16 ]Department of Anesthesia, University Hospital Ghent, De Pintelaan 185, B-9000 Ghent, ER Schmid Institute of Anaesthesiology, Division of Cardiovascular Anaesthesia, University Hospital Zurich, Raemistrasse 100, CH-8091 Zurich, Switzerland
                [17 ]Department of Anesthesia, University Hospital, University of Basel, 4031 Basel, Switzerland
                [18 ]Institute of Anaesthesiology, Division of Cardiovascular Anaesthesia, University Hospital Zurich, Raemistrasse 100, CH-8091 Zurich, Switzerland
                [19 ]Division of Thoracic surgery, University Hospital Zurich, Raemistrasse 100, CH-8091 Zurich, Switzerland
                [20 ]University Hospital Zürich, CH 8091 Zürich, Rämistr. 100, Switzerland
                Article
                cc8153
                10.1186/cc8153
                2887098
                20497611
                72a8b659-2e00-4875-9ec8-0102207ebba1
                Copyright ©2010 BioMed Central Ltd
                History
                Categories
                Review

                Emergency medicine & Trauma
                Emergency medicine & Trauma

                Comments

                Comment on this article