17
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      A Dosimetric Comparison of Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy, Volumetric-Modulated Arc Therapy, and 4π Non-Coplanar Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy for a Patient with Parameningeal Rhabdomyosarcoma

      case-report

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) is the most common soft tissue sarcoma in children and manifests as two major histological subtypes: embryonal and alveolar. The five-year local failure rate for RMS at parameningeal sites (middle ear, mastoid region, nasal cavity, etc.) is around 17% despite multiple Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Study Group (IRS) trials conducted to determine the optimal radiation treatment regimen. This case report explores the use of intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) for a 10-year-old child who presented with left eye irritation, facial pain, and headaches and was found to have an alveolar parameningeal rhabdomyosarcoma. He received systemic therapy as well as radiation therapy to 5,640 cGy and 4,320 cGy over 24 fractions, prescribed for gross tumor extension and adjacent high-risk involved sites, respectively, via simultaneous integrated boost. Approximately two years following treatment, the patient has had no recurrence of his RMS with no distant metastases. In addition, his presenting symptom of left eye irritation has improved. His only side effect from radiation at this point is short stature, possibly due to growth hormone deficiency. The patient’s IMPT plan was compared with volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and 4π non-coplanar intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) plans, and comparisons of isodose lines show decreased dose to the distal brain tissue with preserved target conformality by IMPT. IMPT also allowed for increased sparing of the patient's retina, lens, and lacrimal gland. All radiation plans achieved conformal dose coverage to the planning/scanning target volumes, while the IMPT plan is potentially better at sparing the patient from developing long-term optic apparatus side effects and neurocognitive defects. In this case, IMPT is comparable, if not favorable, when long-term side effects can be reduced while maintaining dose conformality and local control.

          Related collections

          Most cited references10

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          The Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Study Group (IRSG): Major Lessons From the IRS-I Through IRS-IV Studies as Background for the Current IRS-V Treatment Protocols

          Purpose. To enumerate lessons from studying 4292 patients with rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) in the Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Study Group (IRSG, 1972–1997). Patients. Untreated patients < 21 years of age at diagnosis received systemic chemotherapy, with or without irradiation (XRT) and/or surgical removal of the tumor. Methods. Pathologic materials and treatment were reviewed to ascertain compliance and to confirm response and relapse status. Results. Survival at 5 years increased from 55 to 71% over the period. Important lessons include the fact that extent of disease at diagnosis affects prognosis. Re-excising an incompletely removed tumor is worthwhile if acceptable form and function can be preserved. The eye, vagina, and bladder can usually be saved. XRT is not necessary for children with localized, completely excised embryonal RMS. Hyperfractionated XRT has thus far not produced superior local control rates compared with conventional, once-daily XRT. Patients with non-metastatic cranial parameningeal sarcoma can usually be cured with localized XRT and systemic chemotherapy, without whole-brain XRT and intrathecal drugs. Adding doxorubicin, cisplatin, etoposide, and ifosfamide has not significantly improved survival of patients with gross residual or metastatic disease beyond that achieved with VAC (vincristine, actinomycin D, cyclophosphamide) and XRT. Most patients with alveolar RMS have a tumor-specific translocation. Mature rhabdomyoblasts after treatment of patients with bladder rhabdomyosarcoma are not necessarily malignant, provided that the tumor has shrunk and malignant cells have disappeared. Discussion. Current IRSG-V protocols, summarized herein, incorporate recommendations for risk-based management. Two new agents, topotecan and irinotecan, are under investigation for patients who have an intermediate or high risk of recurrence.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Preliminary results of a phase II trial of proton radiotherapy for pediatric rhabdomyosarcoma.

            This prospective phase II study was designed to assess disease control and to describe acute and late adverse effects of treatment with proton radiotherapy in children with rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS).
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Proton radiotherapy for parameningeal rhabdomyosarcoma: clinical outcomes and late effects.

              To report the clinical outcome and late side effect profile of proton radiotherapy in the treatment of children with parameningeal rhabdomyosarcoma (PM-RMS). Seventeen consecutive children with PM-RMS were treated with proton radiotherapy at Massachusetts General Hospital between 1996 and 2005. We reviewed the medical records of all patients and asked referring physicians to report specific side effects of interest. Median patient age at diagnosis was 3.4 years (range, 0.4-17.6). Embryonal (n = 11), alveolar (n = 4), and undifferentiated (n = 2) histologies were represented. Ten patients (59%) had intracranial extension. Median prescribed dose was 50.4 cobalt gray equivalents (GyRBE) (range, 50.4-56.0 GyRBE) delivered in 1.8-2.0-GyRBE daily fractions. Median follow-up was 5.0 years for survivors. The 5-year failure-free survival estimate was 59% (95% confidence interval, 33-79%), and overall survival estimate was 64% (95% confidence interval, 37-82%). Among the 7 patients who failed, sites of first recurrence were local only (n = 2), regional only (n = 2), distant only (n = 2), and local and distant (n = 1). Late effects related to proton radiotherapy in the 10 recurrence-free patients (median follow-up, 5 years) include failure to maintain height velocity (n = 3), endocrinopathies (n = 2), mild facial hypoplasia (n = 7), failure of permanent tooth eruption (n = 3), dental caries (n = 5), and chronic nasal/sinus congestion (n = 2). Proton radiotherapy for patients with PM-RMS yields tumor control and survival comparable to that in historical controls with similar poor prognostic factors. Furthermore, rates of late effects from proton radiotherapy compare favorably to published reports of photon-treated cohorts. Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Cureus
                Cureus
                2168-8184
                Cureus
                Cureus (Palo Alto (CA) )
                2168-8184
                10 September 2017
                September 2017
                : 9
                : 9
                : e1673
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Department of Radiation Oncology, UT Health San Antonio Cancer Center
                [2 ] Robert Wood Johnson Medical School
                [3 ] David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA
                [4 ] Department of Radiation Oncology, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
                [5 ] Department of Radiation Oncology, Scripps Proton Therapy Center
                Author notes
                Article
                10.7759/cureus.1673
                5679771
                72bf0d98-5cd5-489b-991e-4ced1a782d49
                Copyright © 2017, Chen et al.

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 8 August 2017
                : 10 September 2017
                Categories
                Other
                Pediatrics
                Oncology
                Other

                4pi radiotherapy,intensity modulated proton therapy (impt),rhabdomyosarcoma,alveolar,parameningeal,pm-rms,volumetric modulated arc therapy (vmat),intensity-modulated radiotherapy (imrt),proton therapy

                Comments

                Comment on this article