The decline of moths in Great Britain: a review of possible causes

There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

Abstract

Related collections

Most cited references 132

Record: found
Abstract: found
Article: not found

Synergies among extinction drivers under global change.

Barry W Brook, Navjot Sodhi, Corey J. A. Bradshaw (2008)

If habitat destruction or overexploitation of populations is severe, species loss can occur directly and abruptly. Yet the final descent to extinction is often driven by synergistic processes (amplifying feedbacks) that can be disconnected from the original cause of decline. We review recent observational, experimental and meta-analytic work which together show that owing to interacting and self-reinforcing processes, estimates of extinction risk for most species are more severe than previously recognised. As such, conservation actions which only target single-threat drivers risk being inadequate because of the cascading effects caused by unmanaged synergies. Future work should focus on how climate change will interact with and accelerate ongoing threats to biodiversity, such as habitat degradation, overexploitation and invasive species.

0 comments Cited 637 times – based on 0 reviews      Review now

Bookmark

Record: found
Abstract: not found
Article: not found

Effects of urbanization on species richness: A review of plants and animals

Michael McKinney (2008)

0 comments Cited 570 times – based on 0 reviews      Review now

Bookmark

Record: found
Abstract: found
Article: not found

Farming and the fate of wild nature.

Rhys E. Green, Stephen Cornell, Jörn P W Scharlemann … (2005)

World food demand is expected to more than double by 2050. Decisions about how to meet this challenge will have profound effects on wild species and habitats. We show that farming is already the greatest extinction threat to birds (the best known taxon), and its adverse impacts look set to increase, especially in developing countries. Two competing solutions have been proposed: wildlife-friendly farming (which boosts densities of wild populations on farmland but may decrease agricultural yields) and land sparing (which minimizes demand for farmland by increasing yield). We present a model that identifies how to resolve the trade-off between these approaches. This shows that the best type of farming for species persistence depends on the demand for agricultural products and on how the population densities of different species on farmland change with agricultural yield. Empirical data on such density-yield functions are sparse, but evidence from a range of taxa in developing countries suggests that high-yield farming may allow more species to persist.