27
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares

          The flagship journal of the Society for Endocrinology. Learn more

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Efficacy and safety of larotrectinib in patients with TRK fusion-positive thyroid carcinoma

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective

          Larotrectinib is a highly selective tropomyosin receptor kinase (TRK) inhibitor with demonstrated efficacy across various TRK fusion-positive solid tumours. We assessed the efficacy and safety of larotrectinib in patients with TRK fusion-positive thyroid carcinoma (TC).

          Methods

          We pooled data from three phase I/II larotrectinib clinical trials (NCT02576431, NCT02122913, and NCT02637687). The primary endpoint was the investigator-assessed objective response rate (ORR) per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors v1.1. Secondary endpoints included duration of response (DoR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. Data cut-off: July 2020.

          Results

          Twenty-nine patients (median age: 60; range: 6–80) with TRK fusion-positive TC were treated. Tumour histology was papillary (PTC) in 20 (69%) patients, follicular (FTC) in 2 (7%), and anaplastic (ATC) in 7 (24%) patients. Among 28 evaluable patients, ORR was 71% (95% CI: 51–87); best responses were complete response in 2 (7%) patients, partial response in 18 (64%), stable disease in 4 (14%), progressive disease in 3 (11%), and undetermined in 1 (4%) due to clinical progression prior to the first post-baseline assessment. ORR was 86% (95% CI: 64–97) for PTC/FTC and 29% (95% CI 4–71) for ATC. Median time to response was 1.87 months (range 1.64–3.68). The 24-month DoR, PFS, and OS rates were 81, 69, and 76%, respectively. Treatment-related adverse events were mainly grades 1–2.

          Conclusion

          In TRK fusion-positive TC, larotrectinib demonstrates rapid and durable disease control and a favourable safety profile in patients with advanced disease requiring systemic therapy.

          Significance statement

          NTRK gene fusions are known oncogenic drivers and have been identified in various histologies of thyroid carcinoma, most commonly in papillary thyroid carcinoma. This is the first publication specifically studying a TRK inhibitor in a cohort of TRK fusion-positive thyroid carcinoma patients. In the current study, the highly selective TRK inhibitor larotrectinib showed durable antitumour efficacy and a favourable safety profile in patients with TRK fusion-positive thyroid carcinoma. Our findings show that patients with advanced non-medullary thyroid carcinoma who may require systemic therapy could be considered for testing for gene fusions by next-generation sequencing.

          Related collections

          Most cited references48

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1).

          Assessment of the change in tumour burden is an important feature of the clinical evaluation of cancer therapeutics: both tumour shrinkage (objective response) and disease progression are useful endpoints in clinical trials. Since RECIST was published in 2000, many investigators, cooperative groups, industry and government authorities have adopted these criteria in the assessment of treatment outcomes. However, a number of questions and issues have arisen which have led to the development of a revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Evidence for changes, summarised in separate papers in this special issue, has come from assessment of a large data warehouse (>6500 patients), simulation studies and literature reviews. HIGHLIGHTS OF REVISED RECIST 1.1: Major changes include: Number of lesions to be assessed: based on evidence from numerous trial databases merged into a data warehouse for analysis purposes, the number of lesions required to assess tumour burden for response determination has been reduced from a maximum of 10 to a maximum of five total (and from five to two per organ, maximum). Assessment of pathological lymph nodes is now incorporated: nodes with a short axis of 15 mm are considered measurable and assessable as target lesions. The short axis measurement should be included in the sum of lesions in calculation of tumour response. Nodes that shrink to <10mm short axis are considered normal. Confirmation of response is required for trials with response primary endpoint but is no longer required in randomised studies since the control arm serves as appropriate means of interpretation of data. Disease progression is clarified in several aspects: in addition to the previous definition of progression in target disease of 20% increase in sum, a 5mm absolute increase is now required as well to guard against over calling PD when the total sum is very small. Furthermore, there is guidance offered on what constitutes 'unequivocal progression' of non-measurable/non-target disease, a source of confusion in the original RECIST guideline. Finally, a section on detection of new lesions, including the interpretation of FDG-PET scan assessment is included. Imaging guidance: the revised RECIST includes a new imaging appendix with updated recommendations on the optimal anatomical assessment of lesions. A key question considered by the RECIST Working Group in developing RECIST 1.1 was whether it was appropriate to move from anatomic unidimensional assessment of tumour burden to either volumetric anatomical assessment or to functional assessment with PET or MRI. It was concluded that, at present, there is not sufficient standardisation or evidence to abandon anatomical assessment of tumour burden. The only exception to this is in the use of FDG-PET imaging as an adjunct to determination of progression. As is detailed in the final paper in this special issue, the use of these promising newer approaches requires appropriate clinical validation studies.
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Efficacy of Larotrectinib in TRK Fusion–Positive Cancers in Adults and Children

            Fusions involving one of three tropomyosin receptor kinases (TRK) occur in diverse cancers in children and adults. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of larotrectinib, a highly selective TRK inhibitor, in adults and children who had tumors with these fusions.
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found
              Is Open Access

              Integrated genomic characterization of papillary thyroid carcinoma.

              (2014)
              Papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) is the most common type of thyroid cancer. Here, we describe the genomic landscape of 496 PTCs. We observed a low frequency of somatic alterations (relative to other carcinomas) and extended the set of known PTC driver alterations to include EIF1AX, PPM1D, and CHEK2 and diverse gene fusions. These discoveries reduced the fraction of PTC cases with unknown oncogenic driver from 25% to 3.5%. Combined analyses of genomic variants, gene expression, and methylation demonstrated that different driver groups lead to different pathologies with distinct signaling and differentiation characteristics. Similarly, we identified distinct molecular subgroups of BRAF-mutant tumors, and multidimensional analyses highlighted a potential involvement of oncomiRs in less-differentiated subgroups. Our results propose a reclassification of thyroid cancers into molecular subtypes that better reflect their underlying signaling and differentiation properties, which has the potential to improve their pathological classification and better inform the management of the disease.

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Eur J Endocrinol
                Eur J Endocrinol
                EJE
                European Journal of Endocrinology
                Bioscientifica Ltd (Bristol )
                0804-4643
                1479-683X
                25 March 2022
                01 June 2022
                : 186
                : 6
                : 631-643
                Affiliations
                [1 ]The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas , USA
                [2 ]Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center , New York, New York, USA
                [3 ]Weill Cornell Medical College , New York, New York, USA
                [4 ]Massachusetts General Hospital , Boston, Massachusetts, USA
                [5 ]Harvard Medical School , Boston, Massachusetts, USA
                [6 ]Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center of Jefferson University Health , Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
                [7 ]St Vincent’s University Hospital and Cancer Trials Ireland , Dublin, Ireland
                [8 ]West Virginia University , Morgantown, West Virginia, USA
                [9 ]Fox Chase Cancer Center , Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
                [10 ]Paediatric Oncology Unit , Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
                [11 ]UPMC Hillman Cancer Center , University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
                [12 ]Stanford Cancer Center , Stanford University, Palo Alto, California, USA
                [13 ]Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin , Berlin, Germany
                [14 ]Seoul National University Hospital , Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Integrated Major in Innovative Medical Science, Seoul National University Graduate School, Seoul, South Korea
                [15 ]Samsung Medical Center , Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
                [16 ]University of Cincinnati , Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
                [17 ]Chrestos Concept GmbH & Co. KG , Essen, Germany
                [18 ]Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals , Inc., Toronto, Canada
                [19 ]Bayer S.p.A , Milan, Italy
                Author notes
                Correspondence should be addressed to S G Waguespack; Email: swagues@ 123456mdanderson.org

                (S Kummar is now at Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA)

                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0280-0100
                Article
                EJE-21-1259
                10.1530/EJE-21-1259
                9066591
                35333737
                72d32224-9246-4f60-aa92-9cf0ba817f81
                © The authors

                This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

                History
                : 21 December 2021
                : 25 March 2022
                Categories
                Clinical Study

                Endocrinology & Diabetes
                Endocrinology & Diabetes

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                Related Documents Log