1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
2 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Estigmatización social de las enfermeras de cuidados intensivos al inicio de la pandemia por coronavirus Translated title: Social stigmatization of intensive care nurses at the start of the coronavirus pandemic

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Resumen Objetivo: Explorar los factores de la estigmatización social de las enfermeras de cuidados intensivos al inicio de la pandemia por Covid-19. Método: Estudio observacional exploratorio para comprobar los factores de la estigmatización social en enfermeras de cuidados intensivos que atendieron a pacientes con Covid-19 al inicio de la pandemia mediante muestreo no probabilístico. Se empleó el Cuestionario de Estigma Referenciado para Enfermeras en Cuidados Intensivos. Resultados: Participaron 135 enfermeras, 82,2 % mujeres, 85,9 % entre 25 y 44 años. Manifestaron como sintomatología asociada estrés (36,3 %), insomnio (32,6 %) y ansiedad (31,8 %). La escala mostró un coeficiente α Cronbach 0,866, un índice Kaiser Mayer Olkin 0,886, y Bartlett <0,001, con tres esferas de estigma social que alcanzaron el 61,71 % de la variabilidad del constructo: Aislamiento Social, Exposición a SARS-Cov-2 y Vulnerabilidad profesional. Conclusiones: La vulnerabilidad profesional se asienta sobre el estrés, la sensación de fragilidad o la preocupación por el contagio, presentándose sentimientos ambivalentes. El aislamiento social estaría causado por las actitudes negativas sociales que provocan estereotipos. El estigma social se presenta en el contexto de atención a pacientes con enfermedades infectocontagiosas emergentes.

          Translated abstract

          Abstract Aim: Explore the factors of social stigmatization of intensive care nurses at the start of the Covid-19 pandemic. Method: Exploratory observational study to verify the factors of social stigmatization in intensive care nurses who cared for patients with Covid-19 at the beginning of the pandemic using non-probabilistic sampling. The Referenced Stigma Questionnaire for Intensive Care Nurses was used. Results: 135 nurses participated, 82,2 % women, 85,9 % between 25 and 44 years old. They manifested stress (36,3 %), insomnia (32,6 %) and anxiety (31,8 %) as associated symptoms. The scale showed a α Cronbach coefficient 0.866, a Kaiser Mayer Olkin index of 0.886, and Bartlett´s test <0.001, with three areas of social stigma that reached 61,71 % of the variability of the construct: Social Isolation, Exposure to SARS-Cov-2 and Professional vulnerability. Conclusions: Professional vulnerability is based on stress, the feeling of fragility or concern about contagion, presenting ambivalent feelings. Social isolation would be caused by negative social attitudes that stereotypes cause. Social stigma occurs in the context of care for patients with emerging infectious-contagious diseases.

          Related collections

          Most cited references9

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The experiences of health-care providers during the COVID-19 crisis in China: a qualitative study

          Summary Background In the early stages of the outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in Hubei, China, the local health-care system was overwhelmed. Physicians and nurses who had no infectious disease expertise were recruited to provide care to patients with COVID-19. To our knowledge, no studies on their experiences of combating COVID-19 have been published. We aimed to describe the experiences of these health-care providers in the early stages of the outbreak. Methods We did a qualitative study using an empirical phenomenological approach. Nurses and physicians were recruited from five COVID-19-designated hospitals in Hubei province using purposive and snowball sampling. They participated in semi-structured, in-depth interviews by telephone from Feb 10 to Feb 15, 2020. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analysed using Haase's adaptation of Colaizzi's phenomenological method. Findings We recruited nine nurses and four physicians. Three theme categories emerged from data analysis. The first was “being fully responsible for patients' wellbeing—‘this is my duty’”. Health-care providers volunteered and tried their best to provide care for patients. Nurses had a crucial role in providing intensive care and assisting with activities of daily living. The second category was “challenges of working on COVID-19 wards”. Health-care providers were challenged by working in a totally new context, exhaustion due to heavy workloads and protective gear, the fear of becoming infected and infecting others, feeling powerless to handle patients' conditions, and managing relationships in this stressful situation. The third category was “resilience amid challenges”. Health-care providers identified many sources of social support and used self-management strategies to cope with the situation. They also achieved transcendence from this unique experience. Interpretation The intensive work drained health-care providers physically and emotionally. Health-care providers showed their resilience and the spirit of professional dedication to overcome difficulties. Comprehensive support should be provided to safeguard the wellbeing of health-care providers. Regular and intensive training for all health-care providers is necessary to promote preparedness and efficacy in crisis management. Funding National Key R&D Program of China, Project of Humanities and Social Sciences of the Ministry of Education in China.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The resilience of the Spanish health system against the COVID-19 pandemic

            Spain, with more than 11 000 cases and 491 deaths as of March 17, 2020, has one of the highest burdens of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) worldwide. In response, its government used a royal decree (463/2020) 1 to declare a 15-day national emergency, starting on March 15. Although the Spanish health system has coped well during the 6 weeks since its first case was diagnosed, it will be tested severely in the coming weeks as there is already widespread community transmission in the most affected regions, Madrid, the Basque Country, and Catalonia. The number of new cases in the country is increasing by more than 1000 each day. A crisis such as this places pressure on all building blocks of a health system, 2 each of which we consider in turn. The first is governance. Coordination is crucial in any country, but especially in one like Spain in which responsibility for health is devolved to 17 very diverse regions. The Health Alert and Emergency Coordination Centre (Centro de Coordinación de Alertas y Emergencias Sanitarias in Spanish), created in 2004, provides a mechanism for coordination between the national and regional governments. This mechanism has not, however, ensured that measures are fully coordinated. Thus, the Basque Country declared a public health emergency before any other region, whereas Catalonia requested a complete shutdown of the region, including closure of air, sea, and land ports. Madrid, La Rioja, and Vitoria banned gatherings of more than 1000 people. These measures were accompanied by a range of social distancing measures, including closure of schools, universities, libraries, centres for older people, and sporting venues, and even restricting all movement in some of the most affected areaS. 3 In a country in which regional autonomy has been politically important, the new decree includes a controversial measure to give the central government sweeping new powers over health services, transport, and internal affairs, including giving members of the armed forces powers of law enforcement. These measures have provoked opposition in Catalonia and the Basque Country, which have their own police forces that will now come under national control. However, the imposition of restrictions on movement of people to allow only that necessary to get to work or buy food and medicines, as well as the closure of borders does seem to have been accepted, at least so far, with only limited disagreement among the main parties on the measures adopted. The second building block is financing. Before the decree, central government adopted a series of financial measures to support the health system and protect businesses. It had allocated €2800 million to all regions for health services and created a new fund with €1000 million for priority health interventions. 4 However, these amounts need to be seen against the background of almost a decade of austerity from which the health system has yet to recover. 5 Third, in service delivery, the national Ministry of Health has developed a set of clinical protocols, published on its website. Additional advice is published by certain regions and updated, in some cases, on a daily basis. 6 Health facilities in the worst affected regions are struggling, with inadequate intensive care capacity and an insufficient number of ventilators in particular. Both Catalonia and Madrid 7 have cancelled non-emergency surgery and cleared beds where possible. COVID-19 telephone help lines have long delays or have simply collapsed in some regions. The new decree allows the regions to take over management of private health services while military installations will be used for public health purposes. The fourth block is medicines and equipment. So far, no serious shortages have been reported but supplies of personal protective equipment in health facilities have been a concern in all regions leading to re-use, despite the known risks. There is a particular shortage of face masks caused by early panic buying. These shortages have encouraged profiteering, with private laboratories, for example, charging exorbitant amounts for tests. 8 In response, the central government has centralised purchasing and introduced price controls on medicines 9 requiring companies producing relevant equipment to inform the central government of their stocks within 48 h. The fifth block comprises health workers. Many reports suggest that they are stretched to the point of exhaustion. This situation in part reflects existing staff shortages, again following years of austerity with resultant low salaries. Before the decree, patchy and insufficient measures were suggested such as cancelling holidays or bringing retired nurses and doctors back into the health service. The problems are being exacerbated by the quarantining of a growing number of health workers exposed to patients who are infected. 10 The new decree permits hiring graduates without specialisation, final year medical and nursing students, and extending contracts of medical residents. The final building block, information, is widely considered to have been provided by authorities at all levels in a timely manner via mainstream and social media. The Spanish media has largely acted responsibly, disseminating accurate information and debunking fake news stories circulating on social media networks. These developments have coincided with changing attitudes among the Spanish population. Initially, the disease attracted little attention, but this calm soon gave way to panic and hoarding of key supplies once cases began to increase. However, many manifestations of solidarity have been seen, such as supporting health professionals, those who are most vulnerable, and voluntary social distancing, including greater home working. Already, at least five important lessons can be drawn from the Spanish experience. First, additional financial resources are needed to support regional health systems, each with different initial resources and current challenges. Second, long-term underinvestment in health services, as seen in many countries following the 2008 financial crisis, impairs their resilience by depleting their ability to respond to surges in need for health care with sufficient health professionals, intensive care unit beds, protective equipment, diagnostic test kits, and mechanical ventilators. Third, although Spanish residents do seem largely to have responded responsibly so far, it will be important to draw on evidence from behavioural sciences to ensure that this conduct continues over what could be many months. Fourth, although coordination between the national and regional governments has generally been good, work will be needed to ensure this continues over the next few months, with an understanding that politicians must not be allowed to exploit the situation for political gain. Finally, once the pandemic is over, Spain will need to address the decade of underinvestment in its previously strong health sector, which has left it struggling at this time of crisis.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              A systematic review of multi-level stigma interventions: state of the science and future directions

              Background Researchers have long recognized that stigma is a global, multi-level phenomenon requiring intervention approaches that target multiple levels including individual, interpersonal, community, and structural levels. While existing interventions have produced modest reductions in stigma, their full reach and impact remain limited by a nearly exclusive focus targeting only one level of analysis. Methods We conducted the first systematic review of original research on multi-level stigma-reduction interventions. We used the following eligibility criteria for inclusion: (1) peer-reviewed, (2) contained original research, (3) published prior to initiation of search on November 30, 2017, (4) evaluated interventions that operated on more than one level, and (5) examined stigma as an outcome. We stratified and analyzed articles by several domains, including whether the research was conducted in a low-, middle-, or high-income country. Results Twenty-four articles met the inclusion criteria. The articles included a range of countries (low, middle, and high income), stigmatized conditions/populations (e.g., HIV, mental health, leprosy), intervention targets (e.g., people living with a stigmatized condition, health care workers, family, and community members), and stigma reduction strategies (e.g., contact, social marketing, counseling, faith, problem solving), with most using education-based approaches. A total of 12 (50%) articles examined community-level interventions alongside interpersonal and/or intrapersonal levels, but only 1 (4%) combined a structural-level intervention with another level. Of the 24 studies, only 6 (25%) were randomized controlled trials. While most studies (17 of 24) reported statistically significant declines in at least one measure of stigma, fewer than half reported measures of practical significance (i.e., effect size); those that were reported varied widely in magnitude and were typically in the small-to-moderate range. Conclusions While there has been progress over the past decade in the development and evaluation of multi-level stigma interventions, much work remains to strengthen and expand this approach. We highlight several opportunities for new research and program development.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                index
                Index de Enfermería
                Index Enferm
                Fundación Index (Granada, Granada, Spain )
                1132-1296
                1699-5988
                March 2022
                : 31
                : 1
                : 10-13
                Affiliations
                [4] Zaragoza orgnameHospital Royo Villanova España
                [3] Valladolid orgnameHospital Clínico Universitario España
                [5] A Coruña orgnameComplejo Hospitalario Universitario A Coruña España
                [6] Madrid orgnameHospital Universitario La Paz España
                [2] Valladolid Castilla y León orgnameUniversidad de Valladolid orgdiv1Escuela de Enfermería Dr. Dacio Crespo Spain
                [1] Valladolid orgnameHospital Universitario Río Hortega España
                Article
                S1132-12962022000100004 S1132-1296(22)03100100004
                72e8230d-2344-4069-8d3b-b34b99429999

                This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

                History
                : 28 October 2021
                : 30 December 2021
                Page count
                Figures: 0, Tables: 0, Equations: 0, References: 10, Pages: 4
                Product

                SciELO Spain

                Categories
                Originales

                Covid-19,Unidad de Cuidados Intensivos,Enfermera,Exclusión social,Estigma Social,Coronavirus,Critical Care Unit,Nurses,Social Marginalization,Social stigma

                Comments

                Comment on this article