25
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Reducing uncertainty in the use of allometric biomass equations for predicting above-ground tree biomass in mixed secondary forests

      , , , ,
      Forest Ecology and Management
      Elsevier BV

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references8

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Abandoned Pastures in Eastern Amazonia. I. Patterns of Plant Succession

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Biomass of tropical forests: a new estimate based on forest volumes.

            Recent assessments of areas of different tropical forest types and their corresponding stand volumes were used to calculate the biomass densities and total biomass of tropical forests. Total biomass was estimated at 205 x 10(9) tons, and weighted biomass densities for undisturbed closed and open broadleaf forests were 176 and 61 tons per hectare, respectively. These values are considerably lower than those previously reported and raise questions about the role of the terrestrial biota in the global carbon budget.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Uncertainty in the biomass of Amazonian forests: An example from Rondônia, Brazil

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Forest Ecology and Management
                Forest Ecology and Management
                Elsevier BV
                03781127
                June 2001
                June 2001
                : 146
                : 1-3
                : 199-209
                Article
                10.1016/S0378-1127(00)00460-6
                72f02d7e-1b13-4a38-8098-25a822d65c1d
                © 2001

                http://www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article