4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Feasibility of a Clinical-Radiomics Model to Predict the Outcomes of Acute Ischemic Stroke

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective

          To develop a model incorporating radiomic features and clinical factors to accurately predict acute ischemic stroke (AIS) outcomes.

          Materials and Methods

          Data from 522 AIS patients (382 male [73.2%]; mean age ± standard deviation, 58.9 ± 11.5 years) were randomly divided into the training (n = 311) and validation cohorts (n = 211). According to the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at 6 months after hospital discharge, prognosis was dichotomized into good (mRS ≤ 2) and poor (mRS > 2); 1310 radiomics features were extracted from diffusion-weighted imaging and apparent diffusion coefficient maps. The minimum redundancy maximum relevance algorithm and the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator logistic regression method were implemented to select the features and establish a radiomics model. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to identify the clinical factors and construct a clinical model. Ultimately, a multivariable logistic regression analysis incorporating independent clinical factors and radiomics score was implemented to establish the final combined prediction model using a backward step-down selection procedure, and a clinical-radiomics nomogram was developed. The models were evaluated using calibration, receiver operating characteristic (ROC), and decision curve analyses.

          Results

          Age, sex, stroke history, diabetes, baseline mRS, baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score, and radiomics score were independent predictors of AIS outcomes. The area under the ROC curve of the clinical-radiomics model was 0.868 (95% confidence interval, 0.825–0.910) in the training cohort and 0.890 (0.844–0.936) in the validation cohort, which was significantly larger than that of the clinical or radiomics models. The clinical radiomics nomogram was well calibrated ( p > 0.05). The decision curve analysis indicated its clinical usefulness.

          Conclusion

          The clinical-radiomics model outperformed individual clinical or radiomics models and achieved satisfactory performance in predicting AIS outcomes.

          Related collections

          Most cited references35

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research.

          Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) is a widely used reliability index in test-retest, intrarater, and interrater reliability analyses. This article introduces the basic concept of ICC in the content of reliability analysis.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            2018 Guidelines for the Early Management of Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association

            The purpose of these guidelines is to provide an up-to-date comprehensive set of recommendations for clinicians caring for adult patients with acute arterial ischemic stroke in a single document. The intended audiences are prehospital care providers, physicians, allied health professionals, and hospital administrators. These guidelines supersede the 2013 guidelines and subsequent updates.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The Image Biomarker Standardization Initiative: Standardized Quantitative Radiomics for High-Throughput Image-based Phenotyping

              Background Radiomic features may quantify characteristics present in medical imaging. However, the lack of standardized definitions and validated reference values have hampered clinical use. Purpose To standardize a set of 174 radiomic features. Materials and Methods Radiomic features were assessed in three phases. In phase I, 487 features were derived from the basic set of 174 features. Twenty-five research teams with unique radiomics software implementations computed feature values directly from a digital phantom, without any additional image processing. In phase II, 15 teams computed values for 1347 derived features using a CT image of a patient with lung cancer and predefined image processing configurations. In both phases, consensus among the teams on the validity of tentative reference values was measured through the frequency of the modal value and classified as follows: less than three matches, weak; three to five matches, moderate; six to nine matches, strong; 10 or more matches, very strong. In the final phase (phase III), a public data set of multimodality images (CT, fluorine 18 fluorodeoxyglucose PET, and T1-weighted MRI) from 51 patients with soft-tissue sarcoma was used to prospectively assess reproducibility of standardized features. Results Consensus on reference values was initially weak for 232 of 302 features (76.8%) at phase I and 703 of 1075 features (65.4%) at phase II. At the final iteration, weak consensus remained for only two of 487 features (0.4%) at phase I and 19 of 1347 features (1.4%) at phase II. Strong or better consensus was achieved for 463 of 487 features (95.1%) at phase I and 1220 of 1347 features (90.6%) at phase II. Overall, 169 of 174 features were standardized in the first two phases. In the final validation phase (phase III), most of the 169 standardized features could be excellently reproduced (166 with CT; 164 with PET; and 164 with MRI). Conclusion A set of 169 radiomics features was standardized, which enabled verification and calibration of different radiomics software. © RSNA, 2020 Online supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Kuhl and Truhn in this issue.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Korean J Radiol
                Korean J Radiol
                KJR
                Korean Journal of Radiology
                The Korean Society of Radiology
                1229-6929
                2005-8330
                August 2022
                27 May 2022
                : 23
                : 8
                : 811-820
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Radiology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
                [2 ]Department of Artificial Intelligence, Julei Technology, Wuhan, China.
                [3 ]MR Research, GE Healthcare, Beijing, China.
                [4 ]Advanced Application Team, GE Healthcare, Shanghai, China.
                Author notes
                Corresponding author: Wenzhen Zhu, MD, PhD, Department of Radiology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 1095 Jiefang Avenue, Wuhan 430030, China. zhuwenzhen8612@ 123456163.com
                Corresponding author: Guiling Zhang, MD, Department of Radiology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 1095 Jiefang Avenue, Wuhan 430030, China. glingzh@ 123456163.com
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7288-2397
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4383-3120
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3816-5065
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3608-8887
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9180-6816
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8823-1342
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0673-3200
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7321-9300
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5579-9230
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1458-7394
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4706-2068
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0664-3253
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7917-7612
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6700-962X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7111-3606
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6252-9450
                Article
                10.3348/kjr.2022.0160
                9340229
                35695316
                73479824-c1eb-4857-af7d-5813877a4f3e
                Copyright © 2022 The Korean Society of Radiology

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 14 March 2022
                : 26 April 2022
                : 26 April 2022
                Funding
                Funded by: National Natural Science Foundation of China, CrossRef https://doi.org/10.13039/501100001809;
                Award ID: 81730049
                Award ID: 81801666
                Award ID: 82102024
                Categories
                Neuroimaging and Head & Neck
                Original Article

                Radiology & Imaging
                ischemic stroke,prognosis,diffusion-weighted imaging,radiomics,nomogram
                Radiology & Imaging
                ischemic stroke, prognosis, diffusion-weighted imaging, radiomics, nomogram

                Comments

                Comment on this article