58
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Rosetta in CAPRI rounds 13–19

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Modeling the conformational changes that occur on binding of macromolecules is an unsolved challenge. In previous rounds of the Critical Assessment of PRediction of Interactions (CAPRI), it was demonstrated that the Rosetta approach to macromolecular modeling could capture side chain conformational changes on binding with high accuracy. In rounds 13–19 we tested the ability of various backbone remodeling strategies to capture the main-chain conformational changes observed during binding events. These approaches span a wide range of backbone motions, from limited refinement of loops to relieve clashes in homologous docking, through extensive remodeling of loop segments, to large-scale remodeling of RNA. Although the results are encouraging, major improvements in sampling and energy evaluation are clearly required for consistent high accuracy modeling. Analysis of our failures in the CAPRI challenges suggest that conformational sampling at the termini of exposed beta strands is a particularly pressing area for improvement. Proteins 2010. © Wiley-Liss, Inc.

          Related collections

          Most cited references19

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Protein homology detection by HMM-HMM comparison.

          Protein homology detection and sequence alignment are at the basis of protein structure prediction, function prediction and evolution. We have generalized the alignment of protein sequences with a profile hidden Markov model (HMM) to the case of pairwise alignment of profile HMMs. We present a method for detecting distant homologous relationships between proteins based on this approach. The method (HHsearch) is benchmarked together with BLAST, PSI-BLAST, HMMER and the profile-profile comparison tools PROF_SIM and COMPASS, in an all-against-all comparison of a database of 3691 protein domains from SCOP 1.63 with pairwise sequence identities below 20%.Sensitivity: When the predicted secondary structure is included in the HMMs, HHsearch is able to detect between 2.7 and 4.2 times more homologs than PSI-BLAST or HMMER and between 1.44 and 1.9 times more than COMPASS or PROF_SIM for a rate of false positives of 10%. Approximately half of the improvement over the profile-profile comparison methods is attributable to the use of profile HMMs in place of simple profiles. Alignment quality: Higher sensitivity is mirrored by an increased alignment quality. HHsearch produced 1.2, 1.7 and 3.3 times more good alignments ('balanced' score >0.3) than the next best method (COMPASS), and 1.6, 2.9 and 9.4 times more than PSI-BLAST, at the family, superfamily and fold level, respectively.Speed: HHsearch scans a query of 200 residues against 3691 domains in 33 s on an AMD64 2GHz PC. This is 10 times faster than PROF_SIM and 17 times faster than COMPASS.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            A simple physical model for binding energy hot spots in protein-protein complexes.

            Protein-protein recognition plays a central role in most biological processes. Although the structures of many protein-protein complexes have been solved in molecular detail, general rules describing affinity and selectivity of protein-protein interactions do not accurately account for the extremely diverse nature of the interfaces. We investigate the extent to which a simple physical model can account for the wide range of experimentally measured free energy changes brought about by alanine mutation at protein-protein interfaces. The model successfully predicts the results of alanine scanning experiments on globular proteins (743 mutations) and 19 protein-protein interfaces (233 mutations) with average unsigned errors of 0.81 kcal/mol and 1.06 kcal/mol, respectively. The results test our understanding of the dominant contributions to the free energy of protein-protein interactions, can guide experiments aimed at the design of protein interaction inhibitors, and provide a stepping-stone to important applications such as interface redesign.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              X-ray structure of the GCN4 leucine zipper, a two-stranded, parallel coiled coil.

              The x-ray crystal structure of a peptide corresponding to the leucine zipper of the yeast transcriptional activator GCN4 has been determined at 1.8 angstrom resolution. The peptide forms a parallel, two-stranded coiled coil of alpha helices packed as in the "knobs-into-holes" model proposed by Crick in 1953. Contacts between the helices include ion pairs and an extensive hydrophobic interface that contains a distinctive hydrogen bond. The conserved leucines, like the residues in the alternate hydrophobic repeat, make side-to-side interactions (as in a handshake) in every other layer of the dimer interface. The crystal structure of the GCN4 leucine zipper suggests a key role for the leucine repeat, but also shows how other features of the coiled coil contribute to dimer formation.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Proteins
                Proteins
                prot
                Proteins
                Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company (Hoboken )
                0887-3585
                1097-0134
                15 November 2010
                01 June 2010
                : 78
                : 15
                : 3212-3218
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Biochemistry, University of Washington Seattle, Washington 98195
                [2 ]Department of Genome Sciences, University of Washington Seattle, Washington 98195
                [3 ]Department of Genetics, Washington University School of Medicine St. Louis, Missouri 63110
                [4 ]Department of Biochemistry, Stanford University Stanford, California 94305
                [5 ]Computational Biology Program, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center Seattle, Washington 98109
                [6 ]Howard Hughes Medical Institute (HHMI) Seattle, Washington 98195
                Author notes
                *For Correspondence: E-mail dabaker@ 123456uw.edu
                Article
                10.1002/prot.22784
                2952713
                20597089
                734b2524-8ae0-4b51-b057-21d523cc9f88
                Copyright © 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

                Re-use of this article is permitted in accordance with the Creative Commons Deed, Attribution 2.5, which does not permit commercial exploitation.

                History
                : 01 April 2010
                : 10 May 2010
                : 12 May 2010
                Categories
                Research Articles

                Biochemistry
                fragment insertion,rna-protein interactions,docking,protein-protein interactions,backrub,structure prediction,flexible-backbone modeling,conformational changes,rosetta,capri

                Comments

                Comment on this article