1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      How to fit in: The learning principles of cell differentiation

      research-article
      , , *
      PLoS Computational Biology
      Public Library of Science

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Cell differentiation in multicellular organisms requires cells to respond to complex combinations of extracellular cues, such as morphogen concentrations. Some models of phenotypic plasticity conceptualise the response as a relatively simple function of a single environmental cues (e.g. a linear function of one cue), which facilitates rigorous analysis. Conversely, more mechanistic models such those implementing GRNs allows for a more general class of response functions but makes analysis more difficult. Therefore, a general theory describing how cells integrate multi-dimensional signals is lacking. In this work, we propose a theoretical framework for understanding the relationships between environmental cues (inputs) and phenotypic responses (outputs) underlying cell plasticity. We describe the relationship between environment and cell phenotype using logical functions, making the evolution of cell plasticity equivalent to a simple categorisation learning task. This abstraction allows us to apply principles derived from learning theory to understand the evolution of multi-dimensional plasticity. Our results show that natural selection is capable of discovering adaptive forms of cell plasticity associated with complex logical functions. However, developmental dynamics cause simpler functions to evolve more readily than complex ones. By using conceptual tools derived from learning theory we show that this developmental bias can be interpreted as a learning bias in the acquisition of plasticity functions. Because of that bias, the evolution of plasticity enables cells, under some circumstances, to display appropriate plastic responses to environmental conditions that they have not experienced in their evolutionary past. This is possible when the selective environment mirrors the bias of the developmental dynamics favouring the acquisition of simple plasticity functions–an example of the necessary conditions for generalisation in learning systems. These results illustrate the functional parallelisms between learning in neural networks and the action of natural selection on environmentally sensitive gene regulatory networks. This offers a theoretical framework for the evolution of plastic responses that integrate information from multiple cues, a phenomenon that underpins the evolution of multicellularity and developmental robustness.

          Author summary

          In organisms composed of many cell types, the differentiation of cells relies on their ability to respond to complex extracellular cues, such as morphogen concentrations, a phenomenon known as cell plasticity. Although cell plasticity plays a crucial role in development and evolution, it is not clear how, and if, cell plasticity can enhance adaptation to a novel environment and/or facilitate robust developmental processes. In some models, the relationships between the environmental cues (inputs) and the phenotypic responses (outputs) are conceptualised as one-to-one (i.e. simple ‘reaction norms’); whereas the phenotype of plastic cells commonly depends on several simultaneous inputs (i.e. many-to-one, multi-dimensional reaction norms). One alternative is the use of a gene-regulatory network (GRN) models that allow for much more general responses; but this can make analysis difficult. In this work we use a theoretical framework based on logical functions and learning theory to characterize such multi-dimensional reaction norms produced by GRNs. This allows us to reveal a strong and previously unnoticed bias towards the acquisition of simple forms of cell plasticity, which increases their ability to adapt to novel environments. Recognising this bias helps us to understand when the evolution of cell plasticity will increase the ability of plastic cells to adapt to novel environments, to respond appropriately to complex extracellular cues and to enhance developmental robustness. Since this set of properties are required for the evolution of multicellularity, our approach can also contribute to our understanding of this evolutionary transition.

          Related collections

          Most cited references46

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The extended evolutionary synthesis: its structure, assumptions and predictions.

          Scientific activities take place within the structured sets of ideas and assumptions that define a field and its practices. The conceptual framework of evolutionary biology emerged with the Modern Synthesis in the early twentieth century and has since expanded into a highly successful research program to explore the processes of diversification and adaptation. Nonetheless, the ability of that framework satisfactorily to accommodate the rapid advances in developmental biology, genomics and ecology has been questioned. We review some of these arguments, focusing on literatures (evo-devo, developmental plasticity, inclusive inheritance and niche construction) whose implications for evolution can be interpreted in two ways—one that preserves the internal structure of contemporary evolutionary theory and one that points towards an alternative conceptual framework. The latter, which we label the 'extended evolutionary synthesis' (EES), retains the fundaments of evolutionary theory, but differs in its emphasis on the role of constructive processes in development and evolution, and reciprocal portrayals of causation. In the EES, developmental processes, operating through developmental bias, inclusive inheritance and niche construction, share responsibility for the direction and rate of evolution, the origin of character variation and organism-environment complementarity. We spell out the structure, core assumptions and novel predictions of the EES, and show how it can be deployed to stimulate and advance research in those fields that study or use evolutionary biology.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The evolutionary origin of complex features.

            A long-standing challenge to evolutionary theory has been whether it can explain the origin of complex organismal features. We examined this issue using digital organisms--computer programs that self-replicate, mutate, compete and evolve. Populations of digital organisms often evolved the ability to perform complex logic functions requiring the coordinated execution of many genomic instructions. Complex functions evolved by building on simpler functions that had evolved earlier, provided that these were also selectively favoured. However, no particular intermediate stage was essential for evolving complex functions. The first genotypes able to perform complex functions differed from their non-performing parents by only one or two mutations, but differed from the ancestor by many mutations that were also crucial to the new functions. In some cases, mutations that were deleterious when they appeared served as stepping-stones in the evolution of complex features. These findings show how complex functions can originate by random mutation and natural selection.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Why Does Deep and Cheap Learning Work So Well?

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Formal analysisRole: InvestigationRole: SoftwareRole: VisualizationRole: Writing – original draft
                Role: Formal analysisRole: InvestigationRole: MethodologyRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Formal analysisRole: Funding acquisitionRole: InvestigationRole: MethodologyRole: Project administrationRole: SupervisionRole: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS Comput Biol
                PLoS Comput. Biol
                plos
                ploscomp
                PLoS Computational Biology
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, CA USA )
                1553-734X
                1553-7358
                13 April 2020
                April 2020
                : 16
                : 4
                : e1006811
                Affiliations
                [001]Institute for Life Sciences/Electronics and Computer Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, (United Kingdom)
                University of California Irvine, UNITED STATES
                Author notes

                The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8846-7494
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3894-4993
                Article
                PCOMPBIOL-D-19-00112
                10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006811
                7179933
                32282832
                737d84c3-ca85-47ef-a352-a2189dfa4d10
                © 2020 Brun-Usan et al

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 24 January 2019
                : 20 February 2020
                Page count
                Figures: 7, Tables: 0, Pages: 29
                Funding
                Funded by: John Templeton Foundation (US)
                Award ID: 66501
                This work was funded by the Templeton Foundation (Grant 66501 to MBU, ChT and RAW) www.templeton.org/grant/putting-the-extended-evolutionary-synthesis-to-the-test. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
                Categories
                Research Article
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Developmental Biology
                Evolutionary Developmental Biology
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Evolutionary Biology
                Evolutionary Developmental Biology
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Developmental Biology
                Molecular Development
                Morphogens
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Genetics
                Phenotypes
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Evolutionary Biology
                Evolutionary Genetics
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Developmental Biology
                Cell Differentiation
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Evolutionary Biology
                Evolutionary Processes
                Natural Selection
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Neuroscience
                Cognitive Science
                Cognitive Psychology
                Learning
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Psychology
                Cognitive Psychology
                Learning
                Social Sciences
                Psychology
                Cognitive Psychology
                Learning
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Neuroscience
                Learning and Memory
                Learning
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Evolutionary Biology
                Organismal Evolution
                Custom metadata
                vor-update-to-uncorrected-proof
                2020-04-23
                All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.

                Quantitative & Systems biology
                Quantitative & Systems biology

                Comments

                Comment on this article