4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Assessment of temperature, proximity, and course of the esophagus during radiofrequency ablation within the left atrium.

      Circulation

      surgery, Pulmonary Veins, Middle Aged, Male, Humans, Heart Atria, Female, physiopathology, pathology, Esophagus, adverse effects, Catheter Ablation, Body Temperature, Atrial Fibrillation, Aged, Adult

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Left atrioesophageal fistula is a devastating complication of atrial fibrillation ablation. There is no standard approach for avoiding this complication, which is caused by thermal injury during ablation. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the course of the esophagus and the temperature within the esophagus during pulmonary vein antrum isolation (PVAI) and correlate these data with esophagus tissue damage. Eight-one patients presenting for PVAI underwent esophagus evaluation that included temperature probe placement. Esophagus course was obtained with computed tomography, 3D imaging (NAVX), or intracardiac echocardiography. For each lesion, the power, catheter and esophagus temperature, location, and presence of microbubbles were recorded. Lesion location and esophagus course were defined with 6 predetermined left atrial anatomic segments. Endoscopy evaluated tissue changes during and after PVAI. Of 81 patients, the esophagus coursed near the right pulmonary veins in 23 (28.4%), left pulmonary veins in 31 (38.3%), and mid-posterior wall in 27 (33%). Esophagus temperature was significantly higher during left atrial lesions along its course than with lesions elsewhere (38.9+/-1.4 degrees C, 36.8+/-0.5 degrees C, P<0.01). Lesions that generated microbubbles had higher esophagus temperatures than those without (39.3+/-1.5 degrees C, 38.5+/-0.9 degrees C, P<0.01). Power was not predictive of esophagus temperatures. Distance between the esophagus and left atrium was 4.4+/-1.2 mm. Lesions near the course of the esophagus that generated microbubbles significantly increased esophagus temperature compared with lesions that did not. Power did not correlate with esophagus temperatures. Esophagus variability makes the avoidance of lesions along its course difficult. Rather than avoiding posterior lesions, emphasis could be placed on better esophagus monitoring for creation of safer lesions.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.104.509612
          16027254

          Comments

          Comment on this article