8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      COVID-19 Imaging: What We Know Now and What Remains Unknown

      review-article
      , M.D. , , M.D., , M.D., , M.D., , M.D., MS, , M.D., , M.D., , M.D., M.B.A., , M.D., Ph.D.
      Radiology
      Radiological Society of North America

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Infection by SARS-CoV-2 virus ranges from asymptomatic to severe and sometimes fatal disease, most frequently the result of acute lung injury. The role of imaging has evolved during the pandemic, initially with CT as alternative and possibly superior test compared to RT-PCR, to a more limited role based on specific indications. Several classification and reporting schemes were developed for chest imaging early during the pandemic for patients with suspected COVID-19 to aid in triage when the availability of RT-PCR testing was limited and its performance unclear. Interobserver agreement for categories with findings typical of COVID-19 and those suggesting an alternative diagnosis is high across multiple studies. Furthermore, some studies looking at the extent of lung involvement on chest radiography and CT showed correlations with critical illness and need for mechanical ventilation. In addition to pulmonary manifestations, cardiovascular complications such as thromboembolism and myocarditis have been ascribed to COVID-19, sometimes contributing to neurologic and abdominal manifestations. Finally, artificial intelligence has shown promise in both diagnosis and prognosis of COVID-19 pneumonia both with respect to radiography and CT.

          Related collections

          Most cited references122

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Pulmonary Vascular Endothelialitis, Thrombosis, and Angiogenesis in Covid-19

          Progressive respiratory failure is the primary cause of death in the coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) pandemic. Despite widespread interest in the pathophysiology of the disease, relatively little is known about the associated morphologic and molecular changes in the peripheral lung of patients who die from Covid-19.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Correlation of Chest CT and RT-PCR Testing in Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) in China: A Report of 1014 Cases

            Background Chest CT is used for diagnosis of 2019 novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19), as an important complement to the reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) tests. Purpose To investigate the diagnostic value and consistency of chest CT as compared with comparison to RT-PCR assay in COVID-19. Methods From January 6 to February 6, 2020, 1014 patients in Wuhan, China who underwent both chest CT and RT-PCR tests were included. With RT-PCR as reference standard, the performance of chest CT in diagnosing COVID-19 was assessed. Besides, for patients with multiple RT-PCR assays, the dynamic conversion of RT-PCR results (negative to positive, positive to negative, respectively) was analyzed as compared with serial chest CT scans for those with time-interval of 4 days or more. Results Of 1014 patients, 59% (601/1014) had positive RT-PCR results, and 88% (888/1014) had positive chest CT scans. The sensitivity of chest CT in suggesting COVID-19 was 97% (95%CI, 95-98%, 580/601 patients) based on positive RT-PCR results. In patients with negative RT-PCR results, 75% (308/413) had positive chest CT findings; of 308, 48% were considered as highly likely cases, with 33% as probable cases. By analysis of serial RT-PCR assays and CT scans, the mean interval time between the initial negative to positive RT-PCR results was 5.1 ± 1.5 days; the initial positive to subsequent negative RT-PCR result was 6.9 ± 2.3 days). 60% to 93% of cases had initial positive CT consistent with COVID-19 prior (or parallel) to the initial positive RT-PCR results. 42% (24/57) cases showed improvement in follow-up chest CT scans before the RT-PCR results turning negative. Conclusion Chest CT has a high sensitivity for diagnosis of COVID-19. Chest CT may be considered as a primary tool for the current COVID-19 detection in epidemic areas. A translation of this abstract in Farsi is available in the supplement. - ترجمه چکیده این مقاله به فارسی، در ضمیمه موجود است.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              High risk of thrombosis in patients with severe SARS-CoV-2 infection: a multicenter prospective cohort study

              Little evidence of increased thrombotic risk is available in COVID-19 patients. Our purpose was to assess thrombotic risk in severe forms of SARS-CoV-2 infection.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Radiology
                Radiology
                Radiology
                Radiology
                Radiological Society of North America
                0033-8419
                1527-1315
                09 February 2021
                : 204522
                Affiliations
                [1]From the Department of Radiology University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health (J.P.K.); Department of Diagnostic Imaging Rhode Island Hospital and Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University (H.B.); Department of Radiology Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai 1 Gustave Levy Place, New York, NY 10029 (A.B.); Department of Radiology Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai 1 Gustave Levy Place, New York, NY 10029 (M.C.); Montefiore Medical Center Albert Einstein College of Medicine Departments of Radiology and Medicine 111 East 210 Street Bronx, NY 10467 (L.B.H.); Department of Radiology Mayo Clinic 200 First St SW Rochester, MN 55905 (D.F.K.); Department of Radiology Massachusetts General Hospital 55 Fruit Street Boston, MA 02114 (B.P.L.); Department of Medical Imaging University of Arizona College of Medicine Tucson, AZ (G.R.); Scienze Radiologiche, Department of Medicine and Surgery University of Parma V. Gramsci 14, 43126, Parma Italy (N.S.)
                Author notes
                Corresponding Author: J.P.K. jkanne@ 123456uwhealth.org
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4224-8536
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7460-8866
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0976-4088
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0365-7422
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8495-0040
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6657-8241
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3820-2500
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4820-3785
                Article
                204522
                10.1148/radiol.2021204522
                7879709
                33560192
                73d0074f-c70c-4e93-aab9-d046b24cb778
                2021 by the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

                This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the COVID-19 pandemic or until permissions are revoked in writing. Upon expiration of these permissions, PMC is granted a perpetual license to make this article available via PMC and Europe PMC, consistent with existing copyright protections.

                History
                Categories
                Reviews and Commentary
                Review

                Comments

                Comment on this article