157
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    11
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      A Randomized Trial of Protocol-Based Care for Early Septic Shock

      journal-article
      The ProCESS Investigators
      Massachusetts Medical Society

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          New England Journal of Medicine, 370(18), 1683-1693

          Related collections

          Most cited references8

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Lactate clearance vs central venous oxygen saturation as goals of early sepsis therapy: a randomized clinical trial.

          Goal-directed resuscitation for severe sepsis and septic shock has been reported to reduce mortality when applied in the emergency department. To test the hypothesis of noninferiority between lactate clearance and central venous oxygen saturation (ScvO2) as goals of early sepsis resuscitation. Multicenter randomized, noninferiority trial involving patients with severe sepsis and evidence of hypoperfusion or septic shock who were admitted to the emergency department from January 2007 to January 2009 at 1 of 3 participating US urban hospitals. We randomly assigned patients to 1 of 2 resuscitation protocols. The ScvO2 group was resuscitated to normalize central venous pressure, mean arterial pressure, and ScvO2 of at least 70%; and the lactate clearance group was resuscitated to normalize central venous pressure, mean arterial pressure, and lactate clearance of at least 10%. The study protocol was continued until all goals were achieved or for up to 6 hours. Clinicians who subsequently assumed the care of the patients were blinded to the treatment assignment. The primary outcome was absolute in-hospital mortality rate; the noninferiority threshold was set at Delta equal to -10%. Of the 300 patients enrolled, 150 were assigned to each group and patients were well matched by demographic, comorbidities, and physiological features. There were no differences in treatments administered during the initial 72 hours of hospitalization. Thirty-four patients (23%) in the ScvO2 group died while in the hospital (95% confidence interval [CI], 17%-30%) compared with 25 (17%; 95% CI, 11%-24%) in the lactate clearance group. This observed difference between mortality rates did not reach the predefined -10% threshold (intent-to-treat analysis: 95% CI for the 6% difference, -3% to 15%). There were no differences in treatment-related adverse events between the groups. Among patients with septic shock who were treated to normalize central venous and mean arterial pressure, additional management to normalize lactate clearance compared with management to normalize ScvO2 did not result in significantly different in-hospital mortality. clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00372502.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            National estimates of severe sepsis in United States emergency departments.

            The emergency department (ED) often serves as the first site for the recognition and treatment of patients with suspected severe sepsis. However, few evaluations of the national epidemiology and distribution of severe sepsis in the ED exist. We sought to determine national estimates of the number, timing, ED length of stay, and case distribution of patients presenting to the ED with suspected severe sepsis. Analysis of 2001-2004 ED data from the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey. National multistage probability sample of United States ED data. Adult (age, >or=18 yrs) patients with suspected severe sepsis, defined as the concurrent presence of an infec-tion (ED International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision; ICD-9) diagnosis of infection, or a triage temperature or=100.4 degrees F) and organ dysfunction (ED ICD-9) diagnosis of organ dysfunction, intubation, or a triage systolic blood pressure 6 hrs in the ED. Of suspected severe sepsis patients, 20.6% presented to a low-volume ED (
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Barriers to implementing protocol-based sepsis resuscitation in the emergency department--results of a national survey.

              To identify barriers to implementation of a written protocol for early goal-directed therapy for severe sepsis in the busiest emergency departments in the United States. Telephone survey with both quantitative and qualitative analysis. Two busiest teaching and two busiest nonteaching emergency departments in each of the 25 most densely populated combined statistical areas in the United States. Twenty-four physician directors and 40 nursing managers representing 53% of the 100 emergency departments surveyed. Survey questionnaire. Respondents identified lack of available nursing staff to perform the procedure, the inability to monitor central venous pressure in the emergency department, and challenges in identifying septic patients as the most frequent barriers. Although nurse managers and physicians identified similar barriers, nurses were more likely than physicians to list central venous catheter insertion as an important barrier (38% vs. 5%; p = .01), and physicians were more likely to endorse lack of agreement with the early goal-directed therapy resuscitation protocol (16% vs. 0%; p = .03). There were no statistically significant differences in the rankings assigned by clinicians from teaching and nonteaching hospitals. Qualitative analysis of open-ended questions identified barriers in a number of areas, including barriers to initiating the protocol process and factors that distinguish sepsis from other time-sensitive diseases in the emergency department. Nurse managers and physician directors of busy emergency departments representing the largest urban areas in the United States identify multiple barriers to implementing time-sensitive resuscitation to patients with severe sepsis. More than half of all respondents recognized a critical shortage of nursing staff, problems in obtaining central venous pressure monitoring, and challenges in identification of patients with sepsis as the largest roadblocks to overcome in implementing early goal-directed therapy.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Massachusetts Medical Society
                2014
                May 2014
                08 May 2017
                Article
                10.1056/NEJMOA1401602
                4101700
                24635773
                73d0f869-9ddd-4e73-97d8-a5f80392d2dc
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article