28
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Grain Yield and Water Use Efficiency in Extremely-Late Sown Winter Wheat Cultivars under Two Irrigation Regimes in the North China Plain

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Wheat production is threatened by water shortages and groundwater over-draft in the North China Plain (NCP). In recent years, winter wheat has been increasingly sown extremely late in early to mid-November after harvesting cotton or pepper. To improve water use efficiency (WUE) and guide the extremely late sowing practices, a 3-year field experiment was conducted under two irrigation regimes (W1, one-irrigation, 75 mm at jointing; W2, two-irrigation, 75 mm at jointing and 75 mm at anthesis) in 3 cultivars differing in spike size (HS4399, small spike; JM22, medium spike; WM8, large spike). Wheat was sown in early to mid-November at a high seeding rate of 800–850 seeds m −2. Average yields of 7.42 t ha −1 and WUE of 1.84 kg m −3 were achieved with an average seasonal evapotranspiration (ET) of 404 mm. Compared with W2, wheat under W1 did not have yield penalty in 2 of 3 years, and had 7.9% lower seasonal ET and 7.5% higher WUE. The higher WUE and stable yield under W1 was associated with higher 1000-grain weight (TGW) and harvest index (HI). Among the 3 cultivars, JM22 had 5.9%–8.9% higher yield and 4.2%–9.3% higher WUE than WM8 and HS4399. The higher yield in JM22 was attributed mainly to higher HI and TGW due to increased post-anthesis biomass and deeper seasonal soil water extraction. In conclusion, one-irrigation with a medium-sized spike cultivar JM22 could be a useful strategy to maintain yield and high WUE in extremely late-sown winter wheat at a high seeding rate in the NCP.

          Related collections

          Most cited references7

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Breeding for high water-use efficiency.

          There is a pressing need to improve the water-use efficiency of rain-fed and irrigated crop production. Breeding crop varieties with higher water-use efficiency is seen as providing part of the solution. Three key processes can be exploited in breeding for high water-use efficiency: (i) moving more of the available water through the crop rather than it being wasted as evaporation from the soil surface or drainage beyond the root zone or being left behind in the root zone at harvest; (ii) acquiring more carbon (biomass) in exchange for the water transpired by the crop, i.e. improving crop transpiration efficiency; (iii) partitioning more of the achieved biomass into the harvested product. The relative importance of any one of these processes will vary depending on how water availability varies during the crop cycle. However, these three processes are not independent. Targeting specific traits to improve one process may have detrimental effects on the other two, but there may also be positive interactions. Progress in breeding for improved water-use efficiency of rain-fed wheat is reviewed to illustrate the nature of some of these interactions and to highlight opportunities that may be exploited in other crops as well as potential pitfalls. For C3 species, measuring carbon isotope discrimination provides a powerful means of improving water-use efficiency of leaf gas exchange, but experience has shown that improvements in leaf-level water-use efficiency may not always translate into higher crop water-use efficiency or yield. In fact, the reverse has frequently been observed. Reasons for this are explored in some detail. Crop simulation modelling can be used to assess the likely impact on water-use efficiency and yield of changing the expression of traits of interest. Results of such simulations indicate that greater progress may be achieved by pyramiding traits so that potential negative effects of individual traits are neutralized. DNA-based selection techniques may assist in such a strategy.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Raising yield potential in wheat.

            Recent advances in crop research have the potential to accelerate genetic gains in wheat, especially if co-ordinated with a breeding perspective. For example, improving photosynthesis by exploiting natural variation in Rubisco's catalytic rate or adopting C(4) metabolism could raise the baseline for yield potential by 50% or more. However, spike fertility must also be improved to permit full utilization of photosynthetic capacity throughout the crop life cycle and this has several components. While larger radiation use efficiency will increase the total assimilates available for spike growth, thereby increasing the potential for grain number, an optimized phenological pattern will permit the maximum partitioning of the available assimilates to the spikes. Evidence for underutilized photosynthetic capacity during grain filling in elite material suggests unnecessary floret abortion. Therefore, a better understanding of its physiological and genetic basis, including possible signalling in response to photoperiod or growth-limiting resources, may permit floret abortion to be minimized for a more optimal source:sink balance. However, trade-offs in terms of the partitioning of assimilates to competing sinks during spike growth, to improve root anchorage and stem strength, may be necessary to prevent yield losses as a result of lodging. Breeding technologies that can be used to complement conventional approaches include wide crossing with members of the Triticeae tribe to broaden the wheat genepool, and physiological and molecular breeding strategically to combine complementary traits and to identify elite progeny more efficiently.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The distribution and abundance of wheat roots in a dense, structured subsoil--implications for water uptake.

              We analysed the abundance, spatial distribution and soil contact of wheat roots in dense, structured subsoil to determine whether incomplete extraction of subsoil water was due to root system limitations. Intact soil cores were collected to 1.6 m below wheat crops at maturity on a red Kandosol in southern Australia. Wheat roots, remnant roots, soil pores and root-soil contact were quantified at fresh breaks in the soil cores. In surface soil layers ( 0.6 m), where 44% of roots were in pores with at least three other roots. Most pores contained no roots, with occupancy declining from 20% in surface layers to 5% in subsoil. Wheat roots clumped into pores contacted the surrounding soil via numerous root hairs, whereas roots in cracks were appressed to the soil surface and had very few root hairs. Calculations assuming good root-soil contact indicated that root density was sufficient to extract available subsoil water, suggesting that uptake is constrained at the root-soil interface. To increase extraction of subsoil water, genetic targets could include increasing root-soil contact with denser root hairs, and increasing root proliferation to utilize existing soil pores.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS One
                PLoS ONE
                plos
                plosone
                PLoS ONE
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, CA USA )
                1932-6203
                21 April 2016
                2016
                : 11
                : 4
                : e0153695
                Affiliations
                [1 ]College of Agronomy, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, China
                [2 ]Texas A&M AgriLife Research and Extension Center at Amarillo, Amarillo, Texas, 79106, United States of America
                [3 ]School of Science and Technology, Xinxiang University, Xinxiang, Henan, 453003, China
                Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology, CHINA
                Author notes

                Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

                Conceived and designed the experiments: ZW YZ BW. Performed the experiments: BW XX. Analyzed the data: BW ZW QX. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: BW ZW YZ QX BH ZZ. Wrote the paper: BW YZ QX ZW.

                Article
                PONE-D-16-05416
                10.1371/journal.pone.0153695
                4839561
                27100187
                73d88fa4-fa3f-4a36-8eda-8c71e80c98d4
                © 2016 Wang et al

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 6 February 2016
                : 3 April 2016
                Page count
                Figures: 2, Tables: 5, Pages: 14
                Funding
                This study was supported by the National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program, 2012CB955904), the Special Fund for Agro-scientific Research in the Public Interest in China (201303133), the Earmarked Fund for Modern Agro-Industry Technology Research System (CARS-3), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31401297), the China Scholarship Council and the Science and Technology Innovation Program of Food Crop High Yield and Efficiency.
                Categories
                Research Article
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Agriculture
                Crop Science
                Crops
                Cereal Crops
                Wheat
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Organisms
                Plants
                Grasses
                Wheat
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Agriculture
                Agricultural Methods
                Agricultural Irrigation
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Agriculture
                Agricultural Soil Science
                Ecology and Environmental Sciences
                Soil Science
                Agricultural Soil Science
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Plant Science
                Plant Anatomy
                Seeds
                Ecology and Environmental Sciences
                Natural Resources
                Water Resources
                Earth Sciences
                Seasons
                Earth Sciences
                Seasons
                Winter
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Agriculture
                Agricultural Methods
                Agricultural Irrigation
                Lift Irrigation
                Custom metadata
                The data are all contained within the paper, and they are from our experiment.

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article