39
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Phenomenological Approaches in Psychology and Health Sciences

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          A whole family of qualitative methods is informed by phenomenological philosophy. When applying these methods, the material is analyzed using concepts from this philosophy to interrogate the findings and to enable greater theoretical analysis. However, the phenomenological approach represents different approaches, from pure description to those more informed by interpretation. Phenomenological philosophy developed from a discipline focusing on thorough descriptions, and only descriptions, toward a greater emphasis on interpretation being inherent in experience. An analogous development toward a broader acknowledgment of the need for interpretation, the influence of the relationship and the researcher, and the co-construction of the narrative is mirrored in qualitative analytic theory and the description of newer analytic methods as, for example, Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis and Critical Narrative Analysis, methods which are theoretically founded in phenomenology. This methodological development and the inevitable contribution of interpretation are illustrated by a case from my own research about psychological interventions and the process of understanding in general practice.

          Related collections

          Most cited references95

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Justifying knowledge, justifying method, taking action: epistemologies, methodologies, and methods in qualitative research.

          In this article, the authors clarify a framework for qualitative research, in particular for evaluating its quality, founded on epistemology, methodology, and method. They define these elements and discuss their respective contributions and interrelationships. Epistemology determines and is made visible through method, particularly in the participant- researcher relationship, measures of research quality, and form, voice, and representation in analysis and writing. Epistemology guides methodological choices and is axiological. Methodology shapes and is shaped by research objectives, questions, and study design. Methodologies can prescribe choices of method, resonate with particular academic disciplines, and encourage or discourage the use and/or development of theory. Method is constrained by and makes visible methodological and epistemic choices. If we define good quality qualitative research as research that attends to all three elements and demonstrates internal consistency between them, standardized checklists can be transcended and innovation and diversity in qualitative research practice facilitated.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Book: not found

            Healing dramas and clinical plots

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Book: not found

              Narrative Knowing and the Human Science

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Qual Res Psychol
                Qual Res Psychol
                uqrp
                Qualitative Research in Psychology
                Taylor & Francis
                1478-0887
                1478-0895
                15 March 2013
                July 2013
                : 10
                : 3
                : 318-339
                Affiliations
                University of Copenhagen, Research Unit for General Practice and Section of General Practice, Copenhagen, Denmark
                Author notes
                Correspondence: Annette Sofie Davidsen, MD, PhD, Research Unit for General Practice, Copenhagen, Centre of Health and Community, 5 Oester Farimagsgade, P.O. Box 2099, Copenhagen K, 1014 Denmark. E-mail: adavid@ 123456sund.ku.dk
                Article
                10.1080/14780887.2011.608466
                3627202
                23606810
                74144781-9ab7-48af-b488-5ab4a045db54
                Copyright © Taylor & Francis Group, LLC

                This is an open access article distributed under the Supplemental Terms and Conditions for iOpenAccess articles published in Taylor & Francis journals , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                Categories
                Research Article

                description,empathy,general practice,hermeneutics,interpretation,mentalization,narrative,phenomenology,qualitative analysis,suspicion,time

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_

                Similar content324

                Cited by64

                Most referenced authors445